Level-One Study Germany
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

09 SES 08 C, Issues in Language and Literacy Assessment

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-26
17:15-18:45
Room:
P617, Porthania
Chair:
Ruth Zuzovsky

Contribution

Following the UN Decade of Alphabetization (2003-2012), several projects are working on the target of increasing literacy in adult population as well as providing basic education for everyone. „The Education for all goal of increasing literacy rates by 50% by 2015 provides the overall target for the Decade” (http://www.unesco.org/en/literacy/un-literacy-decade). The German Ministry of Education and Research supports this ambitious goal by a wide range of projects and research. The current project “Level One (leo.)” (2009-2012) will establish a benchmark of the dimension of illiteracy in the German population. The benchmark must be related to other studies (e.g. Jeantheau 2007; OECD, Statistic Canada 2005). The project is located at Hamburg University (Prof. Dr. Anke Grotlüschen), co-operation partner are Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Rainer Lehmann (HU Berlin) and PD Dr. Susan Seeber (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen). Until now Germany does not carry out regular country-based surveys of literacy in their adult population. Grotlüschen and Bonna suggest to handle approximately 23% of the German population “at risk”, as the German PISA results show that 13% of the fifteen-year-olds read in level one and 10% below (cf. Grotlüschen/Bonna 2008, p.17). The project is based on the project “lea.” (Literalitätsentwicklung von Arbeitskräften – workforce literacy development), where Alpha Levels were developed. Those levels distinguish reading and writing skills of subjects, whose reading and writing skills are significantly below the basic reading and writing level. Terms and definitions discussed in this context are secondary illiteracy or functional illiteracy. Although the term illiteracy in general seems to be clear, the discussion comes up with different kinds of illiteracy (cf. Linde 2007). One reason is that the demand of the society has changed. “Meanwhile a much higher literacy demand has been formulated. The relativity of illiteracy and complementary terms become particulary clear from a socio-historical perspective. The social significance of literacy is not identical with individual reading and writing competence, as the latter is always measured by the (lowest) standard of literacy set up by the respective society” (Linde 2007, p.238). But theoretical definitions are just one side of the virgin soil that should be entered, the other perspective is the development of a valid survey. The main challenge is to avoid selection that occurs if illiterate subjects quit or avoid to take part in the voluntary test. At this point the innovative design and first results of the current pretest study are presented (n=349).

Method

A representative sample (N=7000) of the German population will be achieved in combination with the Adult Education Survey (AES). This national Large-scale Assessments will be carried out by the research institute “TNS Infratest Sozialforschung”. The survey is an example of Rasch Measurement in Educational Contexts. The data will be evaluated statistically with the help of the Item-Response-Theory and the Partial Credit Model in order to identify the capabilities of individuals and the difficulty of the items (cf. Lehmann/Hoffmann 2009).

Expected Outcomes

Substantial outcome will be the first benchmark of illiteracy in Germany. Further on a valid set of indicators for coming surveys will be developed. After the survey it will be possible to analyze the items and indicators very carefully in order to identify core items that will carry out reliable outcomes. At the end we hope to achieve a test duration less than 15 minutes, so that the instrument could be used for further assessments (cf. Grotlüschen 2009).

References

Dluzak, Claudia; Heinemann, Maria Bettina; Grotlüschen, Anke (2009): Mehr untere Sprossen für die Leiter. Vorschlag für neue "Alpha-Levels". In: DIE Zeitschrift für Erwachsenenbildung, JG. 16, H.1, pp. 34-36. Grotlüschen, Anke; Bonna, Franziska (2008): „German-language literature Review“, in Teaching, Learning and Assessment for Adults: Improving Foundation Skills, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/172255303131. Grotlüschen, Anke (2009): Größenordnung des sekundären Analphabetismus in Deutschland. Skizze zum Projekt „Level-One (leo)“. Hamburg 2009. Linde, Andrea (2007): Alphabetisierung, Basic Education, or Literacy? In: Grotlüschen, Anke; Linde, Andrea (eds.): Literalität, Grundbildung oder Lesekompetenz? Beiträge zu einer Theorie-Praxis-Diskussion. Münster, New York, München u.a.: pp. 237-245. Jeantheau, Jean-Pierre (2007): IVQ-Erhebung 2004/2005: Schwerpunkt ANCLI-Modul und erstre Ergebnisse. In: Grotlüschen, Anke; Linde, Andrea (eds.): Literalität, Grundbildung oder Lesekompetenz? Beiträge zu einer Theorie-Praxis-Diskussion. Münster, New York, München u.a. pp. 57-59. Lehmann, Rainer; Hoffmann, Ellen (eds) (2009): BELLA: Berliner Erhebung arbeitsrelevanter Basis-Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit dem Förderbedarf "Lernen". Münster, Ney York, München u.a. OECD/Statistics Canada (2005): Learning a Living. First results of the Adults Literacy and Life Skills Survey. Herausgegeben von OECD. Ottawa, Paris.

Author Information

Universität Hamburg
Fakultät für Erziehungswissenschaft, Psychologie und Bewegungswissenschaft
Hamburg

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.