Session Information
MC_Poster, Poster Session Main Conference
Main Conference Poster Session
Contribution
The subject Environmental studies was first introduced during curricula reform of compulsory education in 1996 as a substitute for the subject Science and Society that existed in The Programme of Life and Work in Elementary Schools (1984). The purpose of the subject Environmental studies, that is taught in the first cycle of the nine-year elementary schools, is to present the complexity, diversity and interweaving of factors that operate in human's natural and social environment. Therefore contents from various scientific fields, i.e. natural, technical and social sciences are involved in it. It continues and directs spontaneous children's investigation of our world, while it also promotes discovering complexity and interrelationships in phenomena and processes in natural and social environment. Knowledge that children acquire through direct experiences in the environment or through media is extended and deepened in the classroom (Učni načrt, 1998). Such learning can be realised through different teaching strategies and approaches, commonly denominated as open learning. Its main characteristic is that teachers do not stick traditionally to learning aims, contents and methods but they rather adapt them to pupils' interests and abilities in order to create conditions for pupils' collaboration and for considering their previous experiences (Blažič et al., 2003)
As the research (Hus et al., 2003, Ivanuš Grmek, Hus, 2006) indicates that teachers of Environmental studies use different teaching approaches in all thematic areas of the subject (mostly project work), we were interested about the possible impact of individual teaching approaches on quantity and quality of pupils' knowledge and on their interest for learning about specific contents of Environmental studies. During the research process we focused on two thematic areas in Environmental studies, namely Me and the Nature and What am I Able to do.
On the one hand, traditional ways of teaching place teachers in the monopolistic position, while on the other hand, pupils get less opportunities for individual engagement and cannot play an active role in the process of their learning. Thus we decided to carry out project work as an opportunity to overcome these defects during Environmental studies in the 3rd grade of the elementary school. We designed a didactic experiment in order to test the effectiveness of project work from pupils' knowledge perspective in Environmental studies as well as their interest in learning natural and social studies.
In this article we will focus only on the presentation of effectiveness of project work from pupils' knowledge perspective. Thus we wanted to find the impact of project work from pupils' knowledge perspective in Environmental studies. Considering Bloom's taxonomy of objectives for cognitive domain, we investigated the impact of project work on: reproduction (knowledge of facts, data, notions, definitions and theories), understanding and application of knowledge. We will present the impact of project work on application of knowledge in our article.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
References Blažič, M., Ivanuš Grmek, M., Kramar, M., Strmčnik, F. (2003). Didaktika . Novo mesto: Visokošolsko središče. Inštitut za raziskovalno in razvojno delo. Cobb, C., Danby, S., Farrell, A. (2006). Young children enacting governance. Child¢s play? Centre for Innovating in learning. Australia: Queensland University of Technology. Pridobljeno, 10. 01. 2009, iz: http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/cob05272.pdf Cullingford, C. (2005). Pupil¢s view of creativity and learning Process. Pridobljeno, 15. 12. 2008, iz: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/northcott.pdf. Golob, N. (2001). Naravoslovje in izkustveno učenje. Okoljska vzgoja v šoli, 3, št. 1-2, str. 14-18. Golob, N. (2006). Vloga doživljajsko izkustvenega učenja pri doseganju naravoslovnih ciljev okoljske vzgoje na razredni stopnji. Doktorska disertacija. Univerza v Ljubljani. Henry, J. (1994). Teaching Through Projects. London: Kolan Page: Open University, Institute of Educational Technology. Hus, V., Ivanuš Grmek, M., Čagran, B. (2003). Izvajanje vzgojno-izobraževalnega procesa pri predmetu spoznavanje okolja v prvem triletju devetletne osnovne šole. Evalvacijska študija. Ivanuš Grmek, M., Hus, V. (2006). Odprti pouk pri predmetu spoznavanje okolja. Sodobna pedagogika, 57, št. 2, str. 68-83. Ivanuš Grmek, M., Čagran, B., Sadek, L. (2009). Didaktični pristopi pri poučevanju predmeta spoznavanje okolja v tretjem razredu osnovne šole. Pridobljeno, 12. 9. 2009, iz: http://www.pei.si/UserFilesUpload/file/zalozba/ZnanstvenaPorocila/03_09_didakti%C4%8Dnipristopipripoucevanjupredmetaspoznavanjeokoljavtretjemrazreduosnovne sole.pdf. Ivanuš Grmek, M., Čagran, B., Sadek, L. (2009). Eksperimentalna študija primera pri pouku spoznavanja okolja. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut. Jank, W., Meyer, H. (2006). Didaktični modeli. Ljubljana: Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo. Krnel, D. (2003). Od pomnjenja k razumevanju: je začetno naravoslovje v devetletni šoli drugačno? Šolski razgledi, 554, št. 17, str. 3. Marentič Požarnik, B. (1987). Nova pota v izobraževanju učiteljev. Ljubljana: DZS. Novak, H. (1990). Projektno učno delo: drugačna pot do znanja. Ljubljana: DZS. Učni načrt. Program osnovnošolskega izobraževanja. Spoznavanje okolja. (1998). Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo, znanost in šport, Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.