Intercultural Learning through Pupil Exchange and Encounter in Primary Education
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

07 SES 01 A, Diverse Teachers and Intercultural Education.

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-25
09:15-10:45
Room:
AUDITORIUM II, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:
Yvonne Leeman

Contribution

In the eighties and early nineties there was a kind of optimism in education about the possibilities of  intercultural education to contribute to a humane and just  multicultural society. Nowadays that hope is almost absent. The debate on and in education in Europe focuses on basics, measurable outcomes and integration of immigrants ( Bhatti, Gaine, Gobbo & Leeman  2007).  In the highly ethnically segregated Dutch big cities a new type of intercultural education is emerging.  This current intercultural activity consists of short term pupil exchange and encounter,  between primary schools that  have a  predominant  ‘immigrant’ and a predominant ‘Dutch origin’ pupil population. It is not organized by the schools, but by an agency/ organization that  has been temporary subsidized by special funds or the local authorities.

International research evidence based on Allport’s contact hypothesis (1954) suggests possible effects of exchange and encounter on the personal intercultural attitudes of the pupils. However, the preconditions that facilitate these effects such as preparation, coaching, the duration of the activity, are of importance here. It is striking  that the role of the teacher in this kind of activities has been unaddressed. It is argued that teachers are of  importance for the quality and the effects of contact activities. They are certainly not a neutral factor. Their perspective on and imagination about multicultural society is crucial (Gobbo 2009).

The research questions  of this project are:

a.       What is the teachers’ evaluation of the intercultural activity? What kind of role did they take and what did they learn during the activity about their students?

b.      What is the teachers’ perspective on and  imagination  about the Dutch multicultural society, and what kind of learning activities do they  value  for their pupils?

Method

The research population consists of the participating teachers and school leaders in the 2009 Amsterdam exchange and encounter activity. Ten classes of nine schools participated. All school leaders and participating teachers were invited for an interview and asked to fill in a evaluation sheet. Interviews with 12 teachers and 6 school leaders were held (The three missing school leaders were all ill at the moment of the research)

Expected Outcomes

Almost all teachers are satisfied with the exchange and encounter activities. The activities were well organized and have learning potential. There are different opinions about the aims and about the possible and realized effect. These opinions are connected to their ethnic origin, views on the Dutch multicultural society and to their pedagogical views. Some teachers show an inquisitive and reflective attitude (Masons 2002, Schultz 2003)) and learned through systematic observation of all participating pupils in relation to diversity and commonality and spaces for living together now and in the future Dutch multicultural society. They presented a critical evaluation of the activities and formulated principles for changes and the connection with the regular curriculum.

References

Allport, G.W. (1954) The nature of prejudice: A comprehensive and penetrating study of the origin and nature of prejudice. Garden city, NY: Addisson-Wesley Publishing. Bhatti, G., Gaine, C., Gobbo, F. & Leeman, Y. (2007) Social justice and intercultural education. An open-ended dialogue. Stoke on Trent, UK and Sterling, USA: Trentham Books. Mason, J. (2002) Researching your own practice. The discipline of noticing. London and New York: Routledge and Falmer. Gobbo, F. (2009) On metaphors, everyday diversity and intercultural education: some further reflections. Intercultural Education 20(4) 321-332. Schultz, K. (2003) Listening. A framework for teaching across differences. New York and London: Teachers College Press.

Author Information

University for Humanistics
Utrecht

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.