Socially Just Education For Mobile Students: Rethinking Pedagogies
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

07 SES 01 B, Mobile Pupils and Social Justice Education.

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-25
09:15-10:45
Room:
AUDITORIUM III, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:
Francesca Gobbo

Contribution

In today’s world, there is considerable population mobility across both national and state borders and from one continent to another. As Danaher, Moriarty and Danaher (2009) have pointed out, mobilities receive a wide range of responses, ranging from an appreciation of the glamour of those who ‘jet set’ internationally to the reproach of refugees and the homeless. In light of “unresolved uncertainties” about mobility and fixed residence (Henderson & Danaher, in press) and evidence that many families with school-aged children move locations in many parts of the world – including England (Bhopal & Myers, 2009), Spain (Souto-Otero, 2009), Ireland (Kenny & Binchy, 2009), the US (Gouwens, 2001) and Australia (Henderson, 2009) – it seems timely to consider mobility and school pedagogies in relation to social justice. This is particularly important because schooling tends to be predicated on the assumption that students will have a fixed place of residence.

 

Currently, accountability seems to permeate everything educational. Many countries and organisations (e.g. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) have participated in the accountability agenda through standardised testing of students and considerations about how to raise the quality of learning and teaching in schools. Although calls for improved standards are usually accompanied by arguments for social justice and equity, evidence suggests that mobile students are often invisible to educators and to policy makers (Gouwens, 2009; Henderson, 2009; Kenny & Danaher, 2009) and that many do not achieve the academic levels of their non-mobile peers (e.g. see Office for Standards in Education, 2003). 

 

This paper examines the nexus of student mobility, pedagogy and social justice in schools. It addresses three questions: How do teachers socially and discursively ‘make sense’ of children who change schools regularly as a result of the occupational mobility of their parents? How are teachers’ constructions of the children linked to their classroom pedagogies? And what does this mean for socially just education? Using the learning of English literacy as an example, the paper concludes with a discussion of how pedagogies might be reconsidered, in order to ensure high quality as well as high equity schooling.

 

This paper draws on an Australian study that investigated how teachers tried to make sense of the literacy learning of children with transient lifestyles and of the effects of occupational mobility on the children’s schooling more generally. By considering the learning of ‘school’ literacy as a social and cultural practice, the study examines teachers’ social and discursive constructions of students whose parents were unskilled farm workers and traveled large distances to work summer and winter harvesting seasons. The families had migrated to Australia from many regions of the world, including Europe, Asia and the Pacific Islands and had found employment as unskilled farm labourers. The paper investigates the impact of mobility as a cultural change that has ramifications for social justice in school contexts.  

Method

The paper draws on data that were collected in one primary school where student enrolments fluctuated in line with the harvesting seasons of nearby farming areas. The data were collected during two six month periods, using ethnographic techniques. These included semi-structured interviews with teachers, classroom observations, and the collection of artefacts. Critical discourse analysis, based on the work of Fairclough (2001), is used to conduct a textual and social analysis of the data. As a method of analysis, this works to denaturalise the assumptions underpinning teachers’ social and discursive constructions of the children and the pedagogies that were enacted.

Expected Outcomes

The research answers three questions: How did teachers socially and discursively ‘make sense’ of children who change schools regularly as a result of the occupational mobility of their parents? How are teachers’ constructions of the children linked to their classroom pedagogies? And what does this mean for socially just education in today’s world? The study found that teachers tended to construct negative stories about mobile students and identified the children, their families and their lifestyles in deficit and stereotypical terms. The taken-for-granted assumption that a mobile lifestyle impacts negatively on children’s literacy learning meant that teachers had low academic expectations of the children and this influenced the pedagogies that were enacted. The paper concludes by discussing how a rethinking of pedagogies is essential if schooling is to ensure high equity and high quality learning outcomes for mobile students. These implications are important in the current global context where family and student mobility appears to be increasing and there is pressure to ensure that all students are able to achieve successfully at school.

References

Bhopal, K., & Myers, M. (2009). Gypsy, Roma and Traveller pupils in schools in the UK: Inclusion and "good practice". International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(3), 299-314. Danaher, P. A., Moriarty, B., & Danaher, G. (2009). Mobile learning communities: Creating new educational futures. London: Routledge. Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London: Longman. Gouwens, J. A. (2001). Migrant education: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. Gouwens, J. A. (2009). Respondent's text. In P. A. Danaher, M. Kenny & J. Remy Leder (Eds.), Traveller, nomadic and migrant education (pp. 221-224). New York: Routledge. Henderson, R. (2009). Itinerant farm workers' children in Australia: Learning from the experiences of one family. In P. A. Danaher, M. Kenny & J. Remy Leder (Eds.), Traveller, nomadic and migrant education (pp. 46-58). New York: Routledge. Henderson, R., & Danaher, P. A. (in press). Moving with the times: Pedagogies for mobile students. Kenny, M., & Binchy, A. (2009). Irish Travellers, identity and the education system. In P. A. Danaher, M. Kenny & J. Remy Leder (Eds.), Traveller, nomadic and migrant education (pp. 117-131). New York: Routledge. Kenny, M., & Danaher, P. A. (2009). Three dimensions of changing school. In P. A. Danaher, M. Kenny & J. Remy Leder (Eds.), Traveller, nomadic and migrant education (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge. Office for Standards in Education. (2003). Provision and support for Traveller pupils. Retrieved September 13, 2009, from http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/Ofsted-home/Publications-and-research/Browse-all-by/Education/Inclusion/Traveller-children/Provision-and-support-for-Traveller-pupils Souto-Otero, M. (2009). Against the odds: Roma population schooling in Spain. In P. A. Danaher, M. Kenny & J. Remy Leder (Eds.), Traveller, nomadic and migrant education (pp. 171-185). New York: Routledge.

Author Information

University of Southern Queensland
Toowoomba

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.