Pre-Service Teachers’ Beliefs About Teaching – A Person-Centered Perspective
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 04 D, Research on Values, Beliefs & Understandings in Teacher Education

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-25
16:00-17:30
Room:
AUDITORIUM XIII, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:
Jenny Reeves

Contribution

 

The present contribution presents findings on pre-service teachers’ beliefs about teaching. Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning are considered to be an important aspect of their professional competence (Darling-Hammond & Bransford, 2005) and have been found to be related to their classroom activities (Staub & Stern, 2002). In teacher education, beliefs play a twofold role. On the one hand, the beliefs students hold when entering their studies influence what and how they learn; on the other hand, teacher education aims to change potentially dysfunctional beliefs that students may hold and is supposed to provide the students with opportunities to develop a professional and evidence based conception of teaching and learning (Drechsel, 2001; Munby, Russell, & Martin, 2001; Richardson, 1996). Therefore, understanding and clarifying the beliefs held by pre-service teachers are considered significant by researchers and teacher educators (e.g., Chan & Elliott, 2004; Cheng et al., 2009; Richardson, 1996; Staub & Stern, 2002).

Beliefs about teaching can be understood as subjective conceptions about the nature of teaching that are considered true by the individuals but that are not necessarily valid from a scientific perspective (Richardson, 1996). Educational research on the structure of teachers’ beliefs indicates that conceptions of teaching can be described as student-centered and teacher-centered approaches or, correspondingly, as constructivist and traditional approaches (Chan & Elliott, 2004; Postareff & Lindblom-Ylänne, 2008, Prosser & Trigwell, 2006). The former approach conceives teaching as a provision and facilitation of the learning process, the latter as the transmission of knowledge. However, taking a person-centered perspective, less is known about different classes or types of teachers’ beliefs. As Brookhart and Freeman (1992) suggest, entering pre-service teachers should not be considered as an undifferentiated group. Indeed, there is some evidence that individual and group differences regarding conceptions and developmental levels of beliefs about teaching can be found (Chan & Elliot, 2004; Drechsel, 2001). However, there is still a lack of more thorough analyses, especially regarding pre-service teachers’ subjective conceptions of teaching. Moreover, an important question for further investigation would be how different learning opportunities during teacher education relate to changes in beliefs. Therefore, it is important to know whether qualitatively different patterns (i.e., classes) of beliefs about teaching can be identified.

The present study aimed to contribute to closing this gap by identifying typical profiles of pre-service teachers’ beliefs about teaching. For this purpose, we present findings from latent class analyses. Our study contributes to research on pre-service teachers’ beliefs by describing those beliefs from an international educational research perspective and by describing the student sample in terms of latent classes of teaching concepts. In a next step, a longitudinal study will enable the testing of longitudinal hypotheses. By taking a person-centered perspective, we want to investigate how the identified teaching conceptions develop during teacher education and how this development relates to individual characteristics and to features of different teacher education programs. Based on the findings, we aim at cultural comparisons that compare patterns of subjective conceptions of teaching among different systems of teacher education.

Method

The sample contains N=496 first and second-year students enrolled in Bachelor and State Examination teacher education programs at two universities in Germany. Students’ subjective teaching conceptions were measured by a scale that presents items with activities that are derived from different theoretical perspectives, such as situated learning and constructivism (“to scaffold”), instructional design (“to present”, “to model”), motivational support (“to arouse interest”), and classroom management (“to assign tasks”). The participants rate the subjective association of these activities with their understanding of teaching. There is prior evidence on the reliability and construct validity of this scale. Patterns of beliefs about teaching were identified by latent class analyses (LCA) (Vermunt & Magdison, 2002). LCA is a classification method similar to traditional cluster analysis, however, more sophisticated because it works with latent rather than manifest classes and provides a probability-based rather than a deterministic classification of persons to classes.

Expected Outcomes

Latent class analyses indicated three latent classes of pre-service teachers’ conceptions of teaching. A substantive interpretation of the classes can be obtained by inspecting the students’ answer-profiles on the items. Profile 1 (27.1%) contains students who understand teaching primarily in terms of direct instruction and reject student-oriented activities, such as scaffolding. The activity that these students associate most closely with teaching is “to give a lecture” (instruction-oriented profile). In contrast, students in Profile 2 (40.3%) have a conception of teaching oriented towards the principles of situated learning, characterized by activities that grant autonomy and scaffold learning processes (scaffolding-oriented profile). They reject teaching in terms of direct instruction. Profile 3 seems more balanced, because students in this category (32.6%) interpret teaching both in terms of scaffolding and of direct instruction (balanced profile). While these students appreciate student-oriented teaching activities, they also want to retain control over the learning process and emphasize the importance of consolidating what has been learned. This is apparent from their high scores on items like “to write on the board” or “to assign tasks”. A replication of these exploratory findings and first results from the mentioned longitudinal study will be available at the conference.

References

Brookhart, S. & Freeman, D. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62, 37-60. Chan, K.-W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817-831. Cheng, M. M. H., Chan, K.-W., Tang, S. Y. F., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2009). Pre-service teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs and their conceptions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 319-327. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Drechsel, B. (2001). Subjektive Lernbegriffe und Interesse am Thema Lernen bei angehenden Lehrpersonen [Pre-service teachers’ subjective learning conceptions and interest in learning theories]. Münster: Waxmann. Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers' knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching (pp. 877-904). Washington, DC: AERA. Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers’ descriptions of teaching: broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18, 109-120. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 405-419. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan. Staub, F. C., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers' pedagogical content beliefs matters for students' achievement gains: quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 344-355. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89-106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Author Information

TU Munich
TUM School of Education
Munich
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.