Session Information
MC_Poster, Poster Session Main Conference
Main Conference Poster Session
Contribution
Due to the recent and rapid changes in world economies, globalization and the new demands of workplace, students need to have a deep understanding of the core subjects and be able to apply higher-order thinking skills, solve problems, collaborate with others, become continuing learners, and manage new technologies. Many countries around the globe are making significant efforts to integrate educational technologies in order to improve the quality of their educational systems and prepare students to acquire these essential skills to meet the challenges of the economic and social demands of globalization. In view of the high interest of policy-makers and companies investing in these initiatives, a large number of studies that focus on educational technologies have attempted to measure their impact on student attainment and learning. Many authors agree that the evidence currently available is somewhat inconsistent. Apparently, in certain contexts and in certain disciplines such as language, math and science some students have improved their performance. Nonetheless, results show that there is a close relationship between how educational technologies are used and student attainment. It is now clear that the impact of technology in education does not come with the mere introduction, sophistication or the amount of educational technologies. Much depends on how teachers use them in their classes.
In order to support an effective teaching with educational technologies, during the last years there has been considerable interest among educators and researchers in using the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, developed by Mishra and Koehler. TPACK describes the essential qualities of the knowledge teachers should have for effective technology integration and considers it a complex, context situated and multifaceted challenge for educators. TPACK highlights the importance of connecting technology, pedagogy and content in teacher professional development.
Besides, educators around the world have also adopted the teaching for understanding framework developed by researchers at the Harvard Graduate School of Education to evaluate and guide a productive use of new technologies to promote deeper learning in all disciplines and develop 21st century skills.
In an effort to enrich and support effective and thoughtful ICT integration in Latin America that fosters deep learning, this qualitative study builds on the educational frameworks mentioned above, Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) and the Teaching for Understanding Frameworks to identify the attributes of teacher practices that support effective teaching with educational technologies that foster deep understandingTPACK. It explores the relationship between the characteristics of teacher ICT integration practices and the quality of student disciplinary understanding.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Condie, R., & Munro, B. (2007). The impact of ICT in schools- a landscape review. Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta). Cox, M., Abbott, C., Blakeley, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2003). ICT and pedagogy: A review of the research literature. Conventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta). Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators. . New York, NY: Routlege. Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and Classroom Practices: An International Study. [Article]. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1-14. Kozma, R. B. (2005). National Policies that Connect ICT-Based Education Reform to Economic and Social Development. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 1(2), 117-156. Kozma, R. B. (Ed.). (2003c). Technology, Innovation and Educational Change: A Global Perspective. A Report of the Second Information Technology in Education Study: Module 2. Eugene, OR: ISTE. Light, D., Manso, M., Rizzi, C., Verdi, M., Perez, P., Noguera, M. T., et al. (2005). REDAL (Redes Escolares de América Latina): Una investigación de las mejores prácticas. . Buenos Aires: Fundación Evolución. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2004). Learning for the 21st. Century: A report and mile guide for 21st century skills. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Wiske, M. S. (2004). Using Technology to Dig for Meaning Educational Leadership, 62 (1), 46-50. Wiske, M. S. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Wiske, M. S., Franz, K. R., & Breit, L. (2005). Teaching for Understanding with Technology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.