Genealogy as Political Agency and Pedagogy: Indigenous Narratives of Resistance and Transformation
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

07 SES 04 A, Gender, Identity and Voice

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-25
16:00-17:30
Room:
AUDITORIUM II, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:
Chris Gaine

Contribution

 

  The paper presents data from a case study of a non-traditional secondary school for disadvantaged girls (the majority of whom are Indigenous Australian) located in a suburban area of Queensland (Australia). The paper focuses predominantly on the philosophies and practices of ‘Jenny’; one of the school’s Indigenous teachers. Her story highlights the significance of subversive genealogy in both constituting her strong political identity as an Indigenous woman and in developing a pedagogical approach that supports her students’ cultural awareness and political agency. Jenny's approach is analysed in light of the significant role marginalised women's life writings, their genealogies, can play in disrupting taken-for-granted ‘truths’ about race and gender through giving voice to alternative knowledges obscured and silenced within dominant narratives of history (Moreton-Robinson, 2000; Mirza, 1997; Mohanty, 2003). Foucault’s theorising of the subject through genealogy (Foucault, 1986; 1988) - a theorising particularly useful for many feminists (for example, Weedon, 1987; Sawicki, 1991) - supports this analysis in terms of enabling an identification and troubling of the inequitable power relations that marginalise on the basis of gender and race. This theorising highlights the social processes that produce particular truths and reveals the discursive relations that constitute subjectivity so that the subject is able to reflect upon and resist the very discursive relations that constitute her (Tamboukou, 2003). Jenny’s political identity and pedagogy are analysed and understood through these lenses. The paper foregrounds the capacity of Jenny's subversive genealogy to rebel against and resignify the ways in which Indigenous women and girls have been defined and classified within dominant gendered and racist paradigms (see Mirza, 1997).

 

In illustrating the significance of this pedagogical approach, the paper draws on corroborative data from another Indigenous staff member at the school, ‘Monica’; a youth worker and former student. Like many of the students at the school, Monica comes from a troubled and dislocated family and educational background. The paper identifies how Indigenous genealogies support Monica’s cultural awareness and political agency, and more specifically, provide her with an opportunity to know and critically reflect on her discursive constitution in ways that enable a disruption and transformation of her negative past.

 

Through these stories the paper’s key objective is to present political genealogy as a highly generative theoretical and pedagogical tool for supporting the subversive agency of marginalised and disadvantaged girls and women. While focused on Australia, the relations of power and marginality presented in the paper share clear resonance with other (especially Western) contexts. To these ends, the paper is explicitly configured with an international audience in mind and thus draws attention to the broad theoretical and political relevance of its findings on the subversive potential of genealogy pedagogy.

 

The paper's central research question is: How can genealogy as subversive pedagogy support minority women and girls' cultural awareness and political agency within and beyond the contexts of schooling? 

Method

The paper reports on several in-depth individual interviews with ‘Jenny’ and ‘Monica’. The interviews sought to gather information about, and explore: the women’s specific role at the school; descriptions of the school; key gender and cultural concerns; how such concerns were addressed; and structures and strategies of support for students and staff. The data are presented to highlight the significance of political genealogy in the women’s lives and, as such, are analysed within the theoretical frame of feminist genealogy. The analysis foregrounds how the women draw on genealogy as a political tool to subvert and re-signify their positions of marginalisation within dominant gendered and racist paradigms - in relation to identity work (where the women draw attention to particular critical moments of marginalisation in their lives that have shaped their political agency) and pedagogy (where such moments generate learning opportunities for others to challenge marginalisation and re-story disadvantage).

Expected Outcomes

The analytic frames of subversive genealogy presented in the paper provide significant insight into the ways in which marginalised and disadvantaged girls might be supported to re-write their futures through understanding their past (hooks, 1994). In this sense, following hooks (1994), subversive genealogy can be seen as a location for healing; a process of collective resistance and self-recovery. As subjects of their own gaze, the paper demonstrates how political genealogy can support marginalised women and girls to critically reflect on the discursive relations that have constructed their realities towards developing subjective capacities that enable new moulds of existence. Such capacities necessitate: disrupting genealogies of oppression and subjugation (through highlighting the mechanisms and effects of power that constitute particular truths about difference and marginality); and resurrecting subjugated knowledges (through counter-narratives that legitimise alternative truths about minority women than that represented in dominant white discourse). Importantly, the resurrection and legitimising of subjugated knowledges offer space for a reformulation of the meanings within such discourse and more broadly a resignification of genealogies of oppression. Political genealogy can be seen thus as a pedagogy of hope towards new perspectives from where to theorise different modes of existence towards more just articulations of the future.

References

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Sage. Butler, J. (1995). For careful reading. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange. London: Routledge. Foucault, M. (1986). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Peregrine. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the Self. London: Tavistock. Foucault, M. (1991). Questions of method, a discussion. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. hooks, B. (1994) Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge: New York. hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Boston: South End Press. Huggins, J. (1998). Sister girl: The writings of Aboriginal activist and historian. St Lucia, University of Queensland Press. Mirza, H. (Ed.) (1997). Black British feminism: A reader. London: Routledge. Mohanty, C. (2003). Feminism without borders. Durham, London: Duke University Press. Moreton-Robinson, A. (2000). Talkin’ up to the white woman: Indigenous women and feminism. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press. Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power and the body. London: Routledge. Tamboukou, M. (2003). Writing Feminist Genealogies. Journal of Gender Studies, 12(1), 5-19. Weedon. C. (1987). Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

Author Information

Griffith University
Education
Mt Gravatt

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.