Education reform, educational change, and school improvement are interconnected processes that collectively aim to enhance the quality and effectiveness of education systems. Education reform typically involves system-wide initiatives driven by policymakers to address specific challenges or issues within the educational landscape (Cheng, 2020). These reforms often lead to educational change, which manifests as tangible shifts in practices, structures, and outcomes within schools (Aldridge & McLure, 2023). School improvement, on the other hand, focuses on the successful implementation of these reforms at the school level, emphasizing factors and processes that promote school success (Reynolds et al., 2014).

The role of the principal is pivotal in this context, as they are responsible for translating policy directives into actionable strategies within their schools. Principals must navigate the complexities of educational change, balancing administrative tasks with fostering a supportive and collaborative school culture (Campbell, 2020). Effective principals leverage their leadership approach to build trust, inspire their teams, and engage with various actors in the system to drive school improvement and achieve their goals. They play a crucial role in ensuring that reforms lead to meaningful and sustainable changes in teaching and learning practices, and ultimately enhancing student outcomes, but they also have an influential role in meaning- and sense- making during period of reform (Lee & Ip, 2023; Wang, 2015).

This project examines and centres the intricate narratives of school principals as they recount their career histories in the context of educational reform. Over the past two decades, Hong Kong has witnessed significant policy changes and reform initiatives that have profoundly influenced the roles and responsibilities of school principals (Luk-Fong & Brennan, 2010; Bryant., et al. 2018). Through the collection of narrative data through interviews with principals from various schools across the territory, this research uncovers how these leaders describe their professional journeys and how these experiences shape their identities and decision-making processes.

The primary research questions guiding this study are: (1) What dimensions of principals’ histories and experiences influence their work with respect to school improvement and change? (2) In what ways do people, practice, policies, and patterns shape principals’ decision making? In doing so, this study investigated and presents how school principals articulate their career histories in relation to educational reform and the interplay between their personal identities and their professional decisions regarding school improvement and policy implementation.

The theoretical framework for this study was grounded in the co-construction approach (Park & Datnow, 2009), which emphasizes the dynamic complexity of educational change and the importance of centring this complexity in storytelling and analysis. By focusing on principals in the Hong Kong context, this research offers valuable insights into how these leaders navigate the multifaceted landscape of educational change, actively selecting and prioritizing policies based on their values. This approach builds on previous literature in policy implementation, school reform, leadership narratives, and life history methods, highlighting the power of life history methodologies to reveal how individuals make sense of their worlds and how these worlds shape their actions and perceptions (Scanlan, 2020; Park & Datnow, 2009). In addition, by highlighting the power of life history methodologies, this study underscores the importance of understanding the personal and professional narratives of school principals in shaping educational change (Berger, 2008; Hinchman & Hinchman, 2001).

This study employs a qualitative, life history narrative approach to explore the professional experiences of school principals in relation to educational reform. Individual interviews were conducted with 15 school principals in Hong Kong focusing on their professional life histories and how these intersect with education reforms. This approach ensures that the narratives are comprehensive and reflective of the principals' experiences (Berger, 2008). The life history method is particularly suited for this research as it allows for an in-depth understanding of how individuals construct their identities and make sense of their professional journeys within the broader context of societal and policy changes (Clandinin & Connelly, 1998; McAdams, 2008). Data collection took place between June 2024 and January 2025 and will continue until April 2026. All interview data was transcribed and coded according to a pre-set coding dictionary, with the anticipation that new codes will emerge throughout the project. The analysis focused on identifying key themes and patterns in the narratives, with particular attention to how principals describe their career trajectories, the challenges they face, and their strategies for navigating educational reform. This systematic approach to data analysis allows for the identification of key themes and patterns in the narratives, providing a nuanced understanding of the principals' experiences and decision-making processes (Hinchman & Hinchman, 2001). The analysis and subsequent discussion focuses on identifying key themes and patterns in the narratives, with particular attention to how principals describe their career trajectories, the challenges they face, and their strategies for navigating educational reform. This methodological approach allows for a deep understanding of the co-construction of reform and policy implementation, providing a nuanced view of the principals' experiences and decision-making processes (Oplatka, 2010).

The findings from this study provide significant insights into how school principals construct and articulate their professional narratives in the context of educational reform. By capturing the life histories of principals, this research offers unique insights into the nature of the complexities and challenges faced by school leaders, their sense making practices, and how this leads to the exercise of agency, and the construction of notions of empowerment which takes varied forms. Principals identified characteristics of their histories and experiences that affected the nature and scope of their decision making. Identified were shifts over time in how principals developed and realised the interplay between their expertise, experiences, histories, and networks to make decisions about the nature of their engagement, leadership, and action in relation to education reform, and school improvement efforts more broadly; characteristic of ecological conceptions of agency (Priestley, et al, 2015). This study highlights the space and opportunity for conceptualising further how agency exercised by principals is understood, and the related forms, drivers, and influences. Related to this, this study highlights the diverse leadership approaches, and varying conceptualisations and degrees of empowerment they feel to exercise agency within their schools and broader spheres of influence within and across the system. Many principals emphasised human-centred leadership, building trust, and providing support and resources to as being critical components of their own leadership, but also as enablers for their exercising of leadership that leads to meaningful change for their communities.. Challenges identified include balancing administrative and bureaucratic loads with supporting student and staff well-being, managing staff and parental expectations, and adapting to rapid educational changes. Overall, the findings inform the field about how principals navigate their roles and make decisions about school improvement and policy implementation, and the varied roles of agency and empowerment in this.

Aldridge, J. M., & McLure, F. (2023). Preparing Schools for Educational Change: Barriers and Supports – A Systematic Literature Review. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 23(3), 486-511. Berger, R. J. (2008). Agency, structure, and the transition to disability: A case study with implications for life history research. The Sociological Quarterly, 49(2), 309-333. Bryant, D., Ko, J., & Walker, A. (2018). How Do School Principals in Hong Kong Shape Policy? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(3), 345-359. Campbell, P. (2020). Rethinking professional collaboration and agency in a post-pandemic era. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 337-341. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0033 Cheng, K. M. (2020). System-wide improvement or change efforts in education. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 28(1), 1-20. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1998). Stories to live by: Narrative understandings of school reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(2), 149-164. Hinchman, L., & Hinchman, S. (2001). Memory, identity, community: The idea of narrativity in the human sciences. New York: New York University Press. Lee, M., & Ip, K. (2023). The influence of professional learning communities on informal teacher leadership in a Chinese hierarchical school context. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership Journal, 51(2), 324-344. Luk-Fong, P. Y. Y., & Brennan, M. (2010). Teachers’ Experience of Secondary Education Reform in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Reform, 19(2), 128-153. McAdams, D. P. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story. In John, Robins, & Pervin (Eds). Handbook of personality theory and research, 3rd edition. Guilford Press. Oplatka, I. (2010). Principals in late career: Toward a conceptualization of principals’ tasks and experiences in the pre-retirement period. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 776-815. Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2009). Co-constructing distributed leadership: District and school connections in data-driven decision making. School Leadership and Management, 29(5), 475-492. Priestley, M., Biesta, G.J.J., Philippou, S., & Robinson, S. (2015). The teacher and the curriculum: exploring teacher agency. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward & J. Pandya (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Qian, H. (2018). School Principalship in China. In Kennedy & Lee (Eds). Routledge International Handbook of Schools and Schooling in Asia. Routledge. Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 197-230. Scanlan, M. (2012). Inadvertent exemplars: Life history portraits of two socially just principals. Journal of School Leadership, 22(1), 79-115.