Teacher certification and licensure systems globally, including across the United States, Europe, and Australia, share common goals of ensuring teacher quality but face persistent challenges related to entry barriers, uneven preparation quality, and the design of incentives to attract and retain effective teachers, especially in hard‑to‑staff schools and subjects (Mesquita & Rivas, 2016; Mihai, 2020; Witte et al., 2010). Across contexts, policy debates increasingly center on balancing regulatory standards with flexibility, alternative pathways, and incentive structures that expand supply without undermining instructional quality (King & Yin, 2022; Liu et al., 2018; Zhang & Wang, 2022). This funded study of unlicensed teachers working in Houston, TX, USA schools is designed to understand the challenges and incentives facing diverse teachers working across a wide range of urban and suburban schools and how recent changes have impacted teachers’ perspectives and priorities in pursuing teacher licensure. This qualitative study of teacher interviews aims to provide relevant and personal perspectives to a large- scale issue of teacher quality that is part of the overall “poly-crisis” in educational equity and excellence. We ask the research question, “What challenges and incentives impact diverse educators’ ability to become licensed teachers and remain in the profession?”

Challenges to certification and licensure

A central challenge globally is that formal training and certification requirements can unintentionally restrict the supply of qualified teachers, particularly in high‑need areas (Ingersoll, 2007; King & Yin, 2022; Sutcher et al., 2016). Analyses of U.S. policy reforms suggest that extensive coursework and rigid program structures may deter potential entrants and push systems toward greater reliance on minimally prepared or uncertified teachers, especially in disadvantaged schools (Ingersoll, 2007; Liu et al., 2018). European reviews similarly highlight that existing regulatory frameworks often fail to create strong incentives for teachers or schools (Eurydice, 2013; Loureiro et al., 2023).

Alternative certification has emerged as a policy response to shortages and the high costs and perceived inflexibility of traditional programs (Liu et al., 2018; Sutcher et al., 2016). In Germany and other European countries such as Sweden, Switzerland, and Denmark, alternative certification programs have been implemented to combat teacher shortages and have begun recruiting professionals or graduates from different professional fields to fill the high demand for teachers (Birch, et al., 2018; Lucksnat, et al., 2022). Studies comparing traditionally and alternatively certified teachers find differences in motives for entry, well‑being, and intentions to remain, raising concerns that some alternative programs may prioritize rapid entry over sustained professional growth and retention (Birch, et al., 2018; Zhang & Wang, 2022).

Incentives for recruitment, retention, and development

Financial and career incentives play a growing role in teacher certification policy, particularly in addressing shortages in challenging schools and subjects. A systematic review of international evidence finds that targeted financial incentives—such as bonuses, bursaries, loan forgiveness, or salary supplements—can be effective in attracting teachers to hard‑to‑staff contexts, although their effects on long‑term retention are less consistent (Mihai, 2020). Broader analyses of European and international systems emphasize that incentives must extend beyond entry bonuses to include coherent compensation structures, promotion linked to meaningful professional development, and supportive working conditions that make staying in the profession attractive (Eurydice, 2013; Loureiro et al., 2023; Liu & Lu, 2023). Across both the United States and Europe, the literature converges on the importance of integrating certification policy with robust, well‑designed incentive systems that address not only who enters teaching, but also how teachers are supported and rewarded across their careers (Mihai, 2020; Loureiro et al., 2023; Sutcher et al., 2016).

This qualitative study used semi structured interviews to examine the qualifications, characteristics, and licensure experiences of teachers working in schools within the greater Houston, TX, USA region. Houston was chosen due to the large number of teachers available in diverse contexts (urban, suburban, small town) as well as the ethnic, racial, and age diversity of participants. In addition, funding was secured from a local educational nonprofit in support of the research. A purposive sampling strategy was employed to recruit currently practicing teachers across campuses, subjects, and grade levels, consistent with qualitative sampling approaches that prioritize information rich cases over representativeness (Creswell & Poth, 2018; Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). A total of 58 interviews were conducted with participants from elementary, middle, and high school grade levels. Prior to data collection, participants provided informed consent for participation, audio recording, and the use of anonymized quotations, aligning with ethical guidance for educational interview research (Tracy, 2020). The interview protocol included closed ended demographic items (e.g., gender identity, race/ethnicity, age range, teaching assignment, years of experience, academic background, and certification alignment) followed by open ended questions about career choice, enrollment in educator preparation programs, testing and licensure progress, perceived barriers and incentives, professional supports, and future career intentions. Questions and probes were designed to elicit rich descriptions of teachers’ decision making around educator preparation programs, the financial, logistical, and testing challenges they faced, and the types of supports and incentives that would facilitate licensure completion, following best practices for depth oriented interviewing (Kallio et al., 2016). Interviews were conducted individually, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim for analysis. Data were then coded thematically using an inductive–deductive approach to identify patterns related to choice of preparation pathway, barriers to licensure, financial and professional incentives, and perceived adequacy of district and campus supports, consistent with Braun and Clarke’s (2006) reflexive thematic analysis framework.

The interview findings highlight that teachers’ choices about educator preparation programs and licensure are driven by a practical calculus of cost, convenience, and perceived program quality. Cost and affordability emerge as the most frequently cited reasons for choosing a particular EPP, followed closely by word-of-mouth endorsements and negative perceptions of alternative programs, underscoring the importance of reputation and peer networks in licensure decisions. Convenience—especially online formats, flexible schedules, and clear, minimal entry requirements—also plays a significant role in shaping teachers’ pathways into certification, suggesting that rigid, opaque systems may lose candidates before they even begin. At the same time, teachers face substantial barriers to licensure, particularly miscommunication from programs, time pressures from balancing exams and coursework with full time work and family responsibilities, financial strain from exam and college costs, and the perceived difficulty and confusion surrounding high stakes assessments in licensure requirements (such as the Science of Teaching Reading exam in Texas). Against this backdrop, money based incentives, pay protection, and recognition as fully certified professionals are powerful motivators to persist, with teachers emphasizing both material security and professional pride as reasons to complete licensure. Teachers also call for embedded coaching, meaningful preparation time, and workload aligned compensation, indicating that supportive working conditions and ongoing instructional support are critical complements to financial incentives in helping candidates overcome licensure challenges. Most of the participants interviewed indicated plans to remain as teachers in the classroom and a strong commitment to teaching over the next 3-5 and even 10 years. These findings support the research literature that indicate cost is a significant barrier to teachers entering the profession and also add nuance around teacher titles and professionalism as important incentives. In addition, interviewees expressed a desire for more alignment between school/district supports and licensure programs, including embedded supports and better communication.

Aydarova, O., & Marquardt, S. K. (2016). The global imperatives of higher education: Challenges for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(5), 543–546. Bauer, T., et al. (2011). Teacher education reforms in Europe. European Journal of Education, 46(4), 455–472. Birch, P., Balcon, M. P., Bourgeois, A., Davydovskaia, O., & Tremosa, S. P. (2018). Teaching Careers in Europe: Access, Progression and Support. Eurydice Report. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, European Commission. Eurydice. (2013). Key data on teachers and school leaders in Europe 2013 edition. European Commission. Ingersoll, R. M. (2007). Misdiagnosing America’s teacher quality problem. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 221–225. King, L., & Yin, H. (2022). Should states reduce teacher licensing requirements? Evidence from Texas (NBER Working Paper No. 34232). National Bureau of Economic Research. Liu, S., & Lu, X. (2023). The impact of incentivizing training on students’ outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 98, 102221. Liu, Y., Xu, S., & Stronge, J. H. (2018). Alternative certification: A solution or an alternative problem? Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(4), 1–10. Loureiro, N., et al. (2023). Exploring trends and challenges in professional development of teachers in European Union member states. Studies in Educational Research, 3(4), 45–60. Lucksnat, C., Richter, E., Schipolowski, S., Hoffmann, L., & Richter, D. (2022). How do traditionally and alternatively certified teachers differ? A comparison of their motives for teaching, their well-being, and their intention to stay in the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, 103784. Mesquita, A., & Rivas, S. (2016). A study of teacher training in the United States and Europe. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 100–112. Mihai, A. (2020). What works in attracting and retaining teachers in challenging schools and areas? Oxford Review of Education, 46(6), 702–726. Sutcher, L., Darling Hammond, L., & Carver Thomas, D. (2016). A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 24(35), 1–27. Witte, J., Sursock, A., & Smidt, H. (2010). The Bologna process in higher education. European Journal of Education, 45(4), 497–510. Zhang, Q., & Wang, L. (2022). How do traditionally and alternatively certified teachers differ? Teaching and Teacher Education, 119, 103874.