Rural higher education scholarship in the United States, U.S., has grown significantly over the last five decades but remains uneven, fragmented, and dominated by urban-centric assumptions (Grant et al., 2024). Despite rural areas covering more than 90% of the North American landmass and housing roughly one-quarter of the populations(Barkey & Renaud, 2025; Dobis, 2021), studies often portray rural students through deficit-oriented, homogenizing lenses (Bell, 1992; Koricich et al., 2018; Showalter et al., 2023; Stotzer, 2012). This creates a gap between the lived realities of rural communities and the knowledge produced about them. Using a thematic literature review approach, this paper examines rural higher education scholarship primarily in the U.S. Thirty peer-reviewed studies were critically assessed to identity recurring themes, with supporting documentation from state and federal governments and historical texts used to contextualize the findings. Three major themes emerged as central pillars shaping understandings of rurality within the higher education landscape: “access and equity,” “identity and community,” and “academic preparedness.

This paper critically examines the role of institutions of higher education in perpetuating narratives of absence, homogenized constructions of rurality, and the systemic exclusion of rural communities as legitimate knowledge producers. To illuminate how these dynamics operate and to guide analysis, the paper is organized around three research questions:

1. How has higher education scholarship conceptualized rural students and communities through the dominant tenets of access and equity, identity and community, and academic preparedness?
2. Which knowledge actors (scholars, policy institutions, philanthropic organizations) shape the definition of “rural” within higher education research, and how does this influence the marginalization of rural voices?
3. What urban-normative assumptions shape these bodies of scholarship, and how do they constrain understandings of rural identity, success, and belonging?

The paper pursues four interrelated objectives. First, it maps the existing literature through a thematic review of 30 peer-reviewed studies to examine how the three dominant tenets are framed and linked. Second, it interrogates epistemic authority, by tracing who is recognized as legitimate knowledge producers and how their positionalities reinforce urban-normative narratives. Third, it develops a revised analytical framework that foregrounds rural identity as a distinct, non-deficit construct and proposes concrete pathways for community-partnered research. Finally, the paper generates actionable recommendations for higher education practitioners and scholars to redesign access, identity, and preparedness initiatives and outreach that respect local rural heterogeneity.

While grounded primarily in U.S.-based scholarship, the concerns raised in this paper extend well beyond the American context. Across Europe and other international higher education systems, rural and peripheral regions face parallel challenges related to spatial inequality, demographic decline, limited institutional access, and urban-centered policy design. By foregrounding urbanormativity as a transnational analytical lens, this paper offers a framework that can be adapted across national contexts to examine how rural students are positioned within diverse national systems. This paper invites comparative and place-based approaches that recognize rural communities as active participants in knowledge creation rather than peripheral beneficiaries of higher education policy.

This paper employs a critical, theory-driven qualitative literature review methodology to examine how rural students are conceptualized within higher education scholarship. Drawing on Critical Rural Theory, this paper conceptualizes rurality as socially constructed, politically contested, and historically marginalized within higher education research (Bernal, 2002),(Pfrenger, 2024; Showalter et al., 2023). Critical Race Theory examines how power, inequality, and knowledge production shape whose experiences and perspectives are legitimized in rural higher education research (Cain & Smith, 2020; Hernández, 2016; Sims & Ferrare, 2021). Together with frameworks of urbanormativity and metronormativity, these perspectives inform critical synthesis of existing literature and guide analysis of how knowledge about rurality is produced, framed, and circulated (Fulkerson, 2019). A narrative literature review was conducted to identify peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and selected policy-relevant and historical texts published primarily within the past two decades. The literature spans higher education, rural sociology, education policy, and student development. Sources were identified through database searches and citation tracing, with attention to frequently cited works shaping dominant narratives in the field. Using a narrative approach, the literature was thematically analyzed across three dominant tenets in the field: access and equity, identity and community, and academic preparedness. The analysis followed a thematic synthesis process. Studies were first grouped by tenet and then examined for recurring assumptions, deficit framings, and urban-centric benchmarks of success. Particular attention was paid to how rural identity was positioned, either as stand-alone identity or only in conjunction with other marginalized identities, a pattern the author terms “rural and.” Elements of critical discourse analysis were incorporated to examine how language such as “college readiness,” “brain drain,” and “success” reinforces urban-normative hierarchies. This methodological approach treats the literature as a site of knowledge production rather than neutral evidence, aligning with the paper’s broader aim of interrogating epistemic authority in rural higher education research.

Three primary outcomes are expected from this paper. First, it demonstrates the narrow set of recurring themes found in higher education scholarship on rural students. While well intentioned, these themes often reproduce deficit-based and homogenizing narratives. Across the three tenets of access and equity, identity and community, and academic preparedness, rural students are frequently positioned as lacking, behind, or in need of remediation to succeed in urban-centric institutional environments. Second, the analysis reveals that urbanormativity operates not only within institutional practices, but also within the understanding of what constitutes creators of knowledge and knowledge production. Rural communities are rarely treated as sites of legitimate expertise, and rural students’ success is commonly measured by their ability to assimilate into urban or metropolitan norms rather than by outcomes to their communities. This reinforces spatial hierarchies that privilege urban institutions, researchers, and policy actors as primary knowledge creators. Third, this paper identities a significant gap in participator, place-based, and community-engaged research approaches within rural higher education scholarship. The absence of rural voices in defining research questions, methodologies, and interpretations, limits the field’s capacity to generate contextually valid and ethically grounded knowledge. In all, these findings support a reorientation of rural higher education research toward epistemic justice. The paper argues that recognizing rural students and communities as knowledge actors, rather than as statistical data sources, can lead to more nuanced understanding of access, identity, and preparedness, and can inform more equitable institutional policy responses.

Barkey, M., & Renaud, P. (2025). Mapping Canada’s Urban and Rural Lanscape—HillNotes. Library of Parliament. Bell, M., M. (1992). The Fruit of Difference: The Rural-Urban Continum as a System of Identity. Rural Sociology, 57(1), 65–82. Bernal, D. D. (2002). Critical Race Theory, Latino Critical Theory, and Critical Raced-Gendered Epistemologies: Recognizing Students of Color as Holders and Creators of Knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800107 Cain, E. J., & Smith, N. (2020). Using Critical Race Theory to Explore the Experiences of College Students from Rural Areas. Georgia Journal of College Student Affairs, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.20429/gcpa.2020.360102 Dobis, E. A. (2021). Rural America at a Glance: 2021 Edition. Fulkerson, G. M. (with Thomas, A. R.). (2019). Urbanormativity: Reality, Representation, and Everyday Life (1st ed). Lexington Books/Fortress Academic. Grant, P. D., Longhurst, J. M., & Thier, M. (2024). Rural Definition Triangulation: Improving the Credibility and Transferability of Rural Education Research in the United States. https://doi.org/10.26209/JRRE4001 Hernández, E. (2016). Utilizing Critical Race Theory to Examine Race/Ethnicity, Racism, and Power in Student Development Theory and Research. Journal of College Student Development, 57(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0020 Koricich, A., Chen, X., & Hughes, R. P. (2018). Understanding the Effects of Rurality and Socioeconomic Status on College Attendance and Institutional Choice in the United States. Review of Higher Education, 41(2), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2018.0004 Koricich, A., Sansone, V., Fryer, A. H., Orphan, C. M., & McClure, K. R. (2022). Introducing our nation’s rural-serving postsecondary institutions: Moving toward greater visibility and appreciation (pp. 1–26). Alliance for Research on Regional Colleges. Pfrenger, W. (2024). Critical Rural Theory: A Decade of Influence on Rural Education Research. Rural Sociology, 89(3), 524–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12556 Showalter, D., Hartman, S. L., Eppley, K., Johnson, J., & Klein, B. (2023). Why Rural Matters 2023: Centering Equity and Opportunity (pp. 1–148). National Rural Education Association. Sims, L. R., & Ferrare, J. J. (2021). “Since I Am From Where I Am From”: How Rural and Urban First-Generation College Students Differentially Use Social Capital to Choose a College Major. https://doi.org/10.26209/JRRE3706 Stotzer, R. L. (2012). Serving Rural Communities with Distance Education Degree Programs. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.699510