The Nordic countries are frequently portrayed in cross-cultural value research as sharing a distinctive cultural profile characterised by egalitarianism, social trust, secular-rational orientations, and strong commitments to individual autonomy (Bréchon & Gonthier, 2017; Inglehart & Baker, 2000; Schwartz, 2006). While these value orientations are well documented among adult populations, considerably less is known about how contemporary Nordic youth understand, prioritise, and ascribe meaning to such values. This gap is significant, as value formation during adolescence is highly dynamic and shaped by generational conditions rather than reproducing adult cultural repertoires (Antoci, 2020; Inglehart & Baker, 2000). Today’s Nordic youth are coming of age in a context marked by global crises and uncertainty, including climate change, economic precarity, political polarization and instability, and the social disruptions following the COVID‑19 pandemic (Kutsar & Kurvet-Käosaar, 2021; Shah et al., 2021).

This paper presents an exploratory mixed‑methods study of core values among Nordic youth, combining large‑scale survey data (N=1,982 students in grades 7–9) from five Nordic countries with longitudinal, in‑depth interviews with 25 young people. Drawing on Schwartz’s theory of cultural value orientations as a comparative backdrop (Schwartz, 1999; Schwartz, 2006), the study adopts a critical age‑cultural perspective that treats youth culture as a distinct meaning‑world rather than a derivative of adult norms (Christopher et al., 2014).

Methodologically, the study utilises a value card interview approach—designed to elicit reflective and situated articulations of values—with reflexive interviewing techniques that foreground participants’ meaning‑making and researcher responsiveness. This design, combined with quantitative analyses of value co‑selection patterns, enables the analysis of both the prevalence of values and the meanings young people attach to them.

Findings: Quantitative analyses identify family, friendship, health, freedom, and wellbeing as the most widely shared values across Nordic youth, alongside education, sport, love, happiness, wealth, and peace. Using multidimensional scaling, we demonstrate that these values cluster into four interconnected domains: cognitive–affective values (knowledge, education, wellbeing, happiness), socio‑emotional values (friendship, sport), socio‑material values (family, love, health), and personal prosperity values (freedom, peace, wealth). These domains appear across national contexts, suggesting a shared Nordic youth value landscape, while still allowing for meaningful internal variation.

Qualitative analyses deepen this structure by illuminating how young people interpret these values in their everyday lives and future aspirations. Across countries, Nordic youth emphasise close relationships as sources of emotional security and belonging, echoing recent findings on post‑pandemic youth priorities (Shah et al., 2021; Ungdomsbarometern, 2024). Education is framed pragmatically as protection against vulnerability while also being associated with personal development, autonomy, and participation in society. Freedom and wealth are primarily understood instrumentally, valued for the opportunities they afford rather than as intrinsic goals, while peace is articulated both as a global ideal and as a condition for inner calm and relational stability.

Overall, the study contributes a systematic mapping of contemporary Nordic youth values that foregrounds relationality, embodied wellbeing, and future‑oriented autonomy. Methodologically, it demonstrates the analytical potential of combining value card interviews with common space analysis to bridge quantitative patterns and qualitative meanings. Substantively, the findings suggest that Nordic youth values represent age‑specific reinterpretations of Nordic cultural ideals shaped by uncertainty, realism, and a strong commitment to social connectedness.

This study employs a mixed-methods design to explore both the prevalence of shared values among Nordic youth and the meanings young people ascribe to these values. Design and sample Qualitative data derive from longitudinal, in-depth interviews with 25 young people—five from each Nordic country—conducted over three interview rounds between spring 2023 and spring 2024. Participants were aged 13–14 at the time of recruitment and attended lower secondary schools. Teachers served as gatekeepers and were asked to recruit students with diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, genders, interests, and value orientations. The researchers had no prior relationships with participants. Quantitative data were collected in autumn 2024 as part of the INSPECT project, yielding 1,982 responses from students in grades 7–9 across 45 schools. The survey aimed to include schools from diverse social and geographical contexts in each country. While the sample is not statistically representative of Nordic youth populations, it provides a broad empirical basis for examining shared patterns and variation. Data collection Interviews were conducted individually in the participants’ preferred language. Following a pilot interview that revealed the limitations of highly open-ended questions about values, subsequent interviews utilised a value card method. Based on established value frameworks and collaborative research discussions, 18 value attributes were presented on cards, supplemented with blank cards to allow participants to introduce values of their own. In each interview, participants selected five values they considered most important and were invited to reflect on their meanings and relevance to their present lives and imagined futures. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and anonymised. The survey asked students to select five values from the same list of attributes used in the interviews. Analysis Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics and multidimensional scaling to visualise patterns of value co-selection and identify underlying value domains. Qualitative data were analysed using a matrix-based approach, systematically comparing participants’ reflections across values and interview rounds. This allowed for cross-case and cross-value analyses linking quantitative clusters to qualitative meaning-making. A constructive and critically reflective approach to examining the gap between the adult researchers’ and young participants’ conceptual understandings (Levitt, 2025) was central throughout the data collection and analysis process. Ethics Ethical approval for the overall INSPECT research was obtained in accordance with national guidelines in each country. Parental consent and youth assent were secured, and all procedures complied with GDPR requirements. Particular attention was paid to voluntariness, confidentiality, and reflexive researcher positioning.

We offer a detailed account of contemporary Nordic youth values, showing that young people across the Nordic countries prioritise close relationships, embodied wellbeing, and conditions enabling future autonomy. Family and friendship emerge as central values, functioning as emotional and material anchors that support wellbeing, identity formation, and a sense of security. These findings align with research documenting increasing emphasis on close relationships and emotional support among Nordic youth amid societal uncertainty (Helve, 2023; Ungdomsbarometern, 2024). We further demonstrate that Nordic youth distinguish between values largely experienced as present and those that are primarily aspirational. Wellbeing, friendships, and family are described as resources to be nurtured and maintained, whereas education, freedom, and financial security are framed as pathways to independence, resilience, and agency. These aspirations are articulated with notable realism: young people acknowledge global risks such as environmental crises and instability yet emphasise sustaining meaningful everyday lives and future opportunities. This balance between risk awareness and commitment to life echoes post pandemic shifts in youth orientations (Kutsar & Kurvet-Käosaar, 2021; Shah et al., 2021). The identified value domains suggest that Nordic youth values neither constitute a straightforward continuation of adult Nordic value profiles nor a radical departure. Rather, they represent age specific reinterpretations of egalitarianism, autonomy, and social cohesion shaped by contemporary conditions and youth specific horizons of meaning. Methodologically, the study demonstrates the benefits of combining quantitative value mapping with qualitative, reflexive interviews to capture both structural patterns and lived meanings (Christopher et al., 2014; Creswell & Clark, 2018). Findings underscore the importance of analysing youth culture as a distinct field of cultural formation. Understanding Nordic youth values requires attention not only to what young people prioritise, but to how values are negotiated and made meaningful within relational and situated contexts—an insight with implications for youth research and policy.

Antoci, D. (2020). Value orientations of adolescents and youth: review and current situation. Homo et Societas, 150–162. Bréchon, P., & Gonthier, F. (2017). European Values: Trends and divides over thirty years (Vol. 17). Brill. Christopher, J. C., Wendt, D. C., Marecek, J., & Goodman, D. M. (2014). Critical cultural awareness: contributions to a globalizing psychology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 645. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications. Helve, H. M. (2023). Values and Solidarity of Young Finnish Millennials and Generation X. Youth, 3(1), 401–413. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51. Kutsar, D., & Kurvet-Käosaar, L. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on families: Young people’s experiences in Estonia. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 732984. Levitt, H. M. (2025). Attending to investigator reflexivity and epistemic privilege: A worksheet for facilitating individual and research team self-reflection. Qualitative Psychology, 12(1), 1. Schwartz, S. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications. Schwartz, S. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative sociology, 5(2-3), 137–182. Shah, M., Rizzo, S., Percy-Smith, B., Monchuk, L., Lorusso, E., Tay, C., & Day, L. (2021). Growing up under COVID-19: Young people’s agency in family dynamics. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 722380. Ungdomsbarometern. (2024). The Generation Report 2024 (Swedish Youth, Issue. https://ungdomsbarometern.se