Topic

Fostering Sustainable Future Perspectives: Indigenous Youth, Higher Education, and Transformative Agency in Contexts of Global Risk

Research Questions

RQ1: What nurtures the development of future perspectives and transformative agency?

RQ2: What aspirations for a sustainable future perspective of indigenous communities are revealed in the reflections of indigenous learners on their higher education experiences?

RQ3: What do learners' reflections reveal as nurturing practices in the higher education experience for sustainable future perspectives for their communities?

Objectives

This research examines how higher education can foster transformative agency among Indigenous youth in marginalized regions facing disproportionate climate and economic risks. The study aims to understand the aspirations and future perspectives of Indigenous learners engaging with blended-learning higher education, identifying which educational practices nurture hope and agency for sustainable futures in vulnerable communities.

The investigation seeks to move beyond standardized educational approaches by centering epistemic justice and decolonial practices in higher education design. Through dialogue with an Indigenous community, the research explores how universities can fulfill their third mission commitment—contributing to societal development beyond traditional teaching and research—by creating meaningful educational opportunities for those at the intersection of ecological risk, marginalization, and historical exclusion.

Conceptual and Theoretical Framework

The World Risk Report underscores how today's young generation confronts unprecedented complexity and severity in global risks. Countries like the Philippines experience these threats acutely through natural catastrophes, economic instability, inflation, and unemployment. Indigenous communities and marginalized regions bear climate change consequences despite contributing least to its causes, creating moral obligations for Global North countries to engage in discourse and develop compensation strategies.(Berlant, 2011; Brown, 2003; Elsner et al., 2025; Frye, 2012)

At forums like COP 30, Indigenous delegates articulate their urgent realities, yet commitments remain insufficient from their perspective(Grosse et al., 2020). Youth from Indigenous communities in the Asian Pacific region call for ecological conversion and intergenerational solidarity. This context raises fundamental questions about how this generation aspires for their future and what ways could nurture hopeful perspectives.(González, 2021)

This research departs from rational choice theory, which treats aspirations as calculated predictions—essentially viewing them as predictive competence for decision-making. Instead, the study adopts a pragmatist perspective that criticizes rational choice as too narrow because it ignores how human creativity generates new strategies inspired by imagined futures. Drawing on Dewey, the pragmatist view positions future imagination as central to human agency, driving and refining present activities.(Dewey, 1922; Evans, 2007; Mkwananzi & Wilson-Strydom, 2018; Moitra, 2024; Zipin et al., 2015) Understanding Aspiration as a culture capacity (Sen, 1999) practiced in higher education, and especially emergent aspirations (Zipin et al., 2015) as navigational capacity closely linked to individuals' agency for change (Appadurai, 2004; Tzenis, 2018; Zipin et al., 2015) represents this research's core argumentation focusing on the culturally sustaining design elements of higher education. In Detail the voice of indigenous learners should be amplified to guide the design of blended learning higher education for meaningful intervention interventions.

Colonial power structures continue shaping educational agendas in often unexamined ways. Educational actors need collaborative, decolonial practices genuinely incorporating affected communities' perspectives.

For Indigenous youth at the intersection of multiple vulnerabilities, foundational questions become existential: Which future perspectives matter? What are their aspirations and dreams? Understanding these perspectives is essential for designing initiatives that respect worldviews, nurture hopes, and respond ethically to global commitments, as meaningful interventions require knowing real aspirations.

Field Research at Apu Palamguwan Cultural Education Center in 2025 A case study conducted in transformative, responsible, and equitable dialogue with an Indigenous community examines these questions through model-based reflection with higher education learners in blended-learning experiences. Students' reflections and reports, clustered thematically, are interwoven with dynamics identified through literature review, enabling broader abstraction of which higher education design elements support aspirations and nourish transformative agency in at-risk communities. RQ1: What nurtures the development of future perspectives and transformative agency? Through literature review, this question examines the interplay between individuals' future perspectives and agency in community transformation, particularly how aspirations, capabilities, and individual agency impact the transformative capacity of at-risk communities. RQ2: What aspirations for a sustainable future perspective of indigenous communities are revealed in the reflections of indigenous learners on their higher education experiences? A case study conducted in dialogue with an Indigenous community explores aspirations emerging from blended-learning higher education experiences through model-based reflection with learners. RQ3: What do learners' reflections reveal as nurturing practices in the higher education experience for sustainable future perspectives for their communities? Students' reflections and reports, clustered thematically into aspirations-nurturing practices, are interwoven with dynamics identified in RQ1. This enables broader abstraction of which higher education design dynamics support individual aspirations and nourish transformative agency in at-risk communities.

Conclusion: Higher Education as a Space for Transformative Agency This research illuminates the vital relationship between aspirations and transformative agency, tracing how one nourishes the other in contexts of profound risk and vulnerability. Higher education institutions carry specific responsibilities that extend well beyond their traditional third mission commitments to stop colonial power structures. Universities must recognize and act upon these obligations by implementing culturally sustainable pedagogies within blended-learning programs. This is not merely an ethical choice but a necessary response to global inequities. The study demonstrates that when higher education embraces decolonial practices and centers Indigenous and marginalized perspectives, it becomes a genuine space for nurturing transformative agency. From the perspectives of Indigenous learners themselves, certain design principles emerge as particularly powerful in nourishing aspirations for sustainable futures. These principles—identified through students' own reflections on their educational experiences—reveal how pedagogical choices directly influence agency for change. When educational design respects cultural worldviews, creates space for Indigenous knowledge systems, and facilitates meaningful community engagement, it strengthens both individual aspirations and collective capacity for transformation. The study shows that transformative agency in vulnerable communities does not develop in isolation from educational experiences. Rather, it is actively cultivated through intentional pedagogical approaches that recognize learners' existing strengths, honor their cultural contexts, and support their visions for community futures. Higher education institutions that take seriously their responsibilities to marginalized communities must therefore move beyond offering access alone. They must fundamentally rethink how programs are designed, whose knowledge counts, and what futures are deemed possible. Ultimately, this research argues that universities serve as critical spaces where sustainable future perspectives can be nurtured—but only when they commit to epistemic justice and culturally grounded pedagogies that center those most affected by global risks.

Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. Culture and Public Action In R. Vijayendra & M. Walton (Eds.). Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394716 Brown, P. (2003). The Opportunity Trap: Education and Employment in a Global Economy. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 141–179. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2003.2.1.4 Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. Henry Holt. Elsner, M., Atkinson, G., & Saadia, Z. (2025). Global Risks Report 2025. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2025/ Evans, K. (2007). Concepts of bounded agency in education, work, and the personal lives of young adults. International Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590600991237 Frye, M. (2012). Bright Futures in Malawi’s New Dawn: Educational Aspirations as Assertions of Identity. American Journal of Sociology, 117(6), 1565–1624. https://doi.org/10.1086/664542 González, M. S. (2021). REPORT on the impacts of climate change on vulnerable populations in developing countries (Nos A9-0115/2021; (2020/2042(INI))). European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0115_EN.html Grosse, C., Mark, B., & Doctoral Student, University of Colorado Boulder, USA. (2020). A colonized COP: Indigenous exclusion and youth climate justice activism at the United Nations climate change negotiations. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 11(3), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2020.03.07 Ladson-Billings, G., Paris, D., Alim, H. S., & Nasir, N. S. (2024). The Past, Present, and Future of Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies: An Invitation to Teachers, Researchers, and Communities. Harvard Educational Review, 94(4), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-94.4.469 Mkwananzi, F., & Wilson-Strydom, M. (2018). Multidimensional disadvantages and educational aspirations of marginalised migrant youth: Insights from the Global South. Journal of Global Ethics, 14(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2018.1496349 Moitra, N. (2024). Participation, assertion and aspiration-indigenous teacher agency in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(7), 1813–1831. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2024.2359712 Paris, D. (2012). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy: A Needed Change in Stance, Terminology, and Practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244 Samy Alim, H., Paris, D., & Wong, C. P. (2020). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy. In N. S. Nasir, C. D. Lee, R. Pea, & M. M. De Royston, Handbook of the Cultural Foundations of Learning (1st edn, pp. 261–276). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774977-18 Sen, A. (1999). Capability and Well-Being. In The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology (Daniel M. Hausman, p. 270). Oxford University Press. Tzenis, J. A. (2018). Campus Immersion: Supporting Youth Agency and Aspirations for Higher Education. Journal of Youth Development, 13(4), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2018.576 Zipin, L., Sellar, S., Brennan, M., & Gale, T. (2015). Educating for Futures in Marginalized Regions: A sociological framework for rethinking and researching aspirations. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.839376