Session Information
11 SES 02 B, Quality of Learning Styles for Educational Effectiveness
Paper Session
Contribution
Topic: A learning style is a combination of learning strategies, typical for an individual who usually uses them in the majority of situations and are sometimes more, sometimes less appropriate (Marentič-Požarnik, 1995). Kolb (1974, 1976, 1984) defined learning as a process, in which knowledge is being created by means of transformation of experiences.
Research Question: In this paper our main interest was shown, how students from our population learn and whether the model of experiential learning is characteristic for them.
Conceptual framework: Learning progress takes place in four learning dimensions. Experiential learning or the concrete experience represents the basis of this model. Other dimensions are: thinking observation, active experimentation and abstract conceptualisation. The majority of teachers today are aware, that the life-long learning and improving their teaching techniques and skills is an essential part of their profession .
Namely, both teachers and students must learn from each other. Learning here means having the possibility of changing our behaviour on the experiential basis. In the process of learning we are getting knowledge, education, habits and skills and we can expand our emotional response in it as well. Because of such an important role of learning we have decided to make a research on students’ learning styles. The most frequently quoted model of learning styles is the model of experiential learning made by David Kolb. We have used this model of learning styles to investigate the relationship between learning and the self-concept of students.
Objective: Several statistical analyses have been done for testing the hypothesis, that students with higher self-concept areas in academics learn in a more complex way and easier and they have got better school grades as well.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and development. New Jersey. Prentice Hall. Kobal, D. (2000). Temeljni vidiki samopodobe. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut. Kobal, D. (2001). Temeljni dejavniki učenja in motivacije za učenje v šoli. Raziskovalno poročilo. Ljubljana. Pedagoški inštitut. Kobal Grum, Darja, Lebarič, Nada, Kolenc, Janez. Relation between self-concept, motivation for education and academic achievement : a Slovenian case. Stud. psychol., 2004, vol. 46, no. 2, str. 105-126, ilustr. Kobal Grum, Darja, Kolenc, Janez. Self-concept and competitiveness in three national cultures. Stud. psychol., 2008, vol. 50, no. 3, str. 291-309, ilustr. Marentič-Požarnik, B., Magajna, L., Peklaj, C. (1995). Izziv raznolikosti: stili spoznavanja, učenja, mišljenja. Nova Gorica. Educa. Marsh, H. W., O´Neill, R. (1984). Self-description questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21 (2) 153-174. Pintrich, R. P., Schunk, H. D. (1996). Motivation in Education. Theory, Research and Applications. Ohio. Prentice Hall. Ruble,T.L. and Stout, D. E. (1991). Reliability, classification stability and response-set bias of alternate forms of the learning style inventory (LSI-1985). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 2, 481-489.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.