Components of Languaging in Tertiary Studies
Author(s):
Jelena Zascerinska (presenting / submitting) Jelena Zascerinska (presenting / submitting) Andreas Ahrens
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES D 07, Parallel Session D 07

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-12
15:10-16:40
Room:
JK 27/106,G, 42
Chair:
Martin Kunz

Contribution

Innovation is recognised as an engine of the economic development with a strong impact on sustainable development in the EU. The dynamic inter-relationship between innovation and tertiary education, namely, innovation is a driver of education and education is the mainspring of the human factor in innovation (Lapiņa, 2008), demands on adjustment of contribution of tertiary education to innovation. 
Tertiary education promotes innovation by providing languaging in language education at tertiary level. The paradigm shift from what students know about language to what they can do with the language (Rimšāne, 2010) in language education requires the components of languaging to be integrated into the processes and environments of language education at tertiary level. 
The research question is as follows: which components of languaging can promote the enhancement of student’ knowledge?
Aim of the research is to analyze the components of languaging for the enhancement of student’ knowledge in language education at tertiary level.
The analysis of the components of languaging in language education on the pedagogical discourse involves a process of analyzing the meaning of key concepts, namely, “languaging”, “social interaction” and “cognitive activity”. Moreover, the study demonstrates how the key concepts are related to the idea of “language education”. The study presents how the steps of the process are related: defining language education → revealing languaging → determining the components of languaging → empirical study within a multicultural environment.
The conceptual framework of the present research is based on the approach to language education as an overarching concept for language as a subject, language across the curriculum and foreign languages (Aase, 2006), languaging as the social practices that are actions performed by our meaning-making selves (Garcia, 2009), language development as the creative process (Мельникова, 2003), language learning as a creative process (Ilyinska, 2004), creativity as the basis of innovation (Lifelong Learning for Creativity and Innovation, 2008), the components of languaging, namely, social interaction and cognitive activity (Zaščerinska, 2009) the process of interiorization and the zone of proximal development (Vygotsky, 1934/1962), the activity theory (Leont’ev, 1978). 
The methodological foundation of the present research on analysis of the components of languaging for the enhancement of student’ knowledge in language education at tertiary level is formed by the System-Constructivist Theory. The System-Constructivist Theory emphasizes that human being’s point of view depends on the subjective aspect (Maslo, 2007): 
- everyone has his/her own system of external and internal perspectives that is a complex open system and 
- experience plays the central role in a construction process (Maslo, 2007). 
Therein, the subjective aspect of human being’s point of view is applicable to the present research to analyse the components of languaging for the enhancement of student’ knowledge in language education at tertiary level.

Method

The qualitative evaluation research aimed at examining the efficiency of English for Academic Purposes studies based on use of social interaction and cognitice activity in the teaching and learning process for the development of student teachers’ communicative competence and, consequently, knowledge has been used in the research. Interpretative research paradigm which corresponds to the nature of humanistic pedagogy (Lūka, 2008) has been determined. The basic directions of the qualitative evaluation research, namely, - from diagnostic evaluation to summative evaluation through formative evaluation, - from self-evaluation to external evaluation through internal evaluation, - from the context analysis to evaluation through observation, determine the sequence of the design’s introduction, namely, from preparing the qualitative evaluation research to the analysis of the results through carrying out the qualitative evaluation research. The present empirical research was carried out in the English for Academic Purposes course within the professional masters’ study programmes School Management, Pedagogy and Music Pedagogy of Riga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy in 2008-2009. The hermeneutic method for content analysis for the qualitative data analysis and the SPSS 17.0 software for primary and secondary quantitative data analysis were used. Data validity is examined by the method triangulation and data triangulation.

Expected Outcomes

The research results allow drawing the conclusion that English for Academic Purposes studies based on use of social interaction and cognitice activity in the teaching and learning process for the development of student teachers’ communicative competence and, consequently, knowledge are efficient. The present research has limitations. A limitation is the empirical study conducted by involving the students and educators at master level of one tertiary institution. Therein, the results of the study cannot be representative for the whole country. Nevertheless, the results of the research, namely, the organization model of English for Academic Purposes studies, may be used as a basis of the development of student teachers’ knowledge at master level of other tertiary institutions. If the results of other tertiary institutions had been available for analysis, different results could have been attained. There is a possibility to continue the study. The following hypothesis for further studies is put forth: students’ knowledge develops in the teaching and learning process based on use of social interaction and cognitice activity if - the students use existing opportunities with other participants, - the educator organizes various opportunities to interact, - the teaching and learning process is implemented from teaching to learning through peer-learning.

References

Aase, L.: Aims in the Teaching/Learning of Language(s) of Education (LE). Language Policy Division, Strasbourg 16-18 October 2006. Garcia, O.: Education in the 21st century. A global perspective. Wiley-Black Well. 2009. Ilyinska, L.: English for Science and Technology: Course Design, Text Analysis, Research Writing. Monograph. Riga Technical University. RTU Publishing House. 2004. Lapiņa, G.: The Pedagogical Comprehension of Innovation in University. Synopsis of the PhD Thesis. University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, 2008. Leont’ev, A. N.: Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall. 1978. Lifelong Learning for Creativity and Innovation: Lifelong Learning for Creativity and Innovation. A Background Paper. February 2008. Luka, I.: Students and the educator's co-operation as a means of development of students' ESP competence. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, University of Goteborg, 10-12 September 2008. British Education Index data base. ID 172916 http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/172916.htm. 2008. Maslo, E.: Transformative Learning Space for Life-Long Foreign Languages Learning. In: International Nordic-Baltic Region Conference of FIPLV Innovations in Language Teaching and Learning in the Multicultural Context. pp. 38-46. Riga, Latvia, 2007. Rimšane, I.: Development of Foreign Language Teacher Education in Latvia, Synopsis of the PhD Thesis. University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, 2010. Vygotsky, L.: Thought and Language. Cambridge. MS: MIT Press; 1934/1962. Zaščerinska, J.: Organisation of English for Academic Purposes Activity for Developing Communicative Competence. In: Journal of International Scientific Publications: Language, Individual & Society, Volume 3, pp. 140-173. (ISSN: 1313 2547). 2009. Мельникова А. (2003). Язык и национальный характер. Речь.

Author Information

Jelena Zascerinska (presenting / submitting)
University of Latvia
Department of Pedagogy
Riga
Jelena Zascerinska (presenting / submitting)
University of Latvia, Latvia
Hochschule Wismar, University of Applied Sciences,Technology, Business and Design, Wismar, Germany

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.