Examination of the Factors Influencing Pre-service Science Teachers' Teaching Self-efficacy
Author(s):
Burcu Senler (presenting / submitting) Semra Sungur
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES B 08, Parallel Session B 08

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-12
11:00-12:30
Room:
JK 28/112,G, 58
Chair:
Wolfgang Lauterbach

Contribution

 

Literature suggests that having pedagogical knowledge and content knowledge is not sufficient alone for teachers to be effective. Teachers’ beliefs about their abilities to positively influence student learning have been demonstrated to have a strong influence on teaching effectiveness (Knoblauch & Hoy, 2008). Indeed, teachers’ self-efficacy -teachers’ judgment of their capabilities to organize and carry out strategies necessary for successfully accomplishing a specific teaching task in a particular context- is found to be significantly linked to their classroom behavior and to student outcomes such as achievement (Ashton & Webb, 1986) and motivation (Midgley, Feldlaufer, & Eccles, 1989). In general, teachers with a strong sense of efficacy appear to be eager to try new strategies and methods to better meet students’ needs (Cousins & Walker, 2000) and show greater commitment to teaching (Coladarci, 1992). They do not give up easily in the face of difficulties and setbacks. A strong sense of self-efficacy helps teachers deal with a struggling student longer and become less critical of student errors (Ashton & Webb, 1986; Gibson & Dembo, 1984; Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk-Hoy & Hoy, 1998). On the other hand, teachers with low levels of self-efficacy tend to be less willing to work with students experiencing difficulties and tend to instruct the class as a whole. They are found to be less optimistic about student learning and to experience lower levels of job-satisfaction (Caprara, Barbaranelli, Steca, & Malone, 2006; Klassen, Bong, Usher, Chong, Huan, Wong, & Georgiou, 2009; Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk-Hoy, & Hoy, 1998). Thus, in order to raise effective teachers, it is important to develop teaching self-efficacy of pre-service science teachers.

In discussing development of self-efficacy, Bandura (1997), proposed four sources which help people to develop self-efficacy. The primary source of information is mastery experiences. Based on the early experiences, one may think that s/he is proficient to do or not to do a task. Vicarious experiences provided by social models involve observation of the behavior of others and the results of that behavior. Social persuasion is occurred verbally or nonverbally when people provide messages of “if I can do it so can you.” Emotional arousal, the fourth source of self-efficacy information, refers person’s feels about their personal abilities in a particular situation. Applied to pre-service teacher training, teacher education program is an important key in developing and enhancing teachers’ sense of efficacy.  The purpose of this study was to examine the  factors influencing pre-service science teachers' teaching self-efficacy beliefs to understand more clearly the concept of science teaching self-efficacy. The results of the study are hoped to provide valuable information about how pre-service science teachers develop teaching self-efficacy beliefs.

Method

Participants This study was conducted with the senior pre-service science teachers in their last semester. Among 35 pre-service science teachers, 10 (7 females and 3 males) were selected via purposive sampling on the basis of convenience. Age of the pre-service teachers ranged from 22 to 25. Context Elementary Science Education (ESE) Program intends to prepare teachers for the school of the Ministry of National Education. ESE Program is a 4-year-program which trains science teachers of grades 6 through 8. During the program, pre-service science teachers are required to complete the coursework suggested by The Council of Higher Education. Data Collection and Procedure Data was gathered by employing semi-structured interviews. In order to explore the participants’ opinions and feelings extensively, open-ended questions were asked. The questions were loosely structured to allow participants to freely express their opinions and experiences. Sub-questions and probes were also used for further elaboration on the answers. All audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. After reading each transcript several times, memos were written to explore themes in the data. Then codes were developed inductively and deductively across the data. Finally, the codes were categorized and grouped into larger themes then the data were analyzed.

Expected Outcomes

Factors which are influential in teaching self-efficacy fell into two themes- field experience and courses. Field experience contains teaching practice and observation. Courses include science method, science content, and classroom management. Field experience was found to have a great influence on teaching self-efficacy. Teaching a lesson to elementary students is a type of the mastery experiences while observation is vicarious experience encountered in this study. As in Bandura’s theory, mastery experiences were mentioned more as the most important source of self-efficacy beliefs. Although vicarious experience is another important source of self-efficacy, participants claimed that observations did not contribute anything to them. Regarding science content courses, some of the participants expressed the view that they need to learn content knowledge in detail. In contrary, the others believed that it was unnecessary to learn advance level science since they are going to teach in elementary level. Majority of the participants claimed that they learned methods well and they are going to apply what they learned to their teaching in the future. Participants’ views on classroom management are similar to those on the other category, practice. Although sufficient theoretical knowledge was given in the course, participants feel unqualified due to lack of experience in class environment.

References

Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman. Bandura, A (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, P. S., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473-490. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 323–337. Cousins, J. B., & Walker, C. A. (2000). Predictors of educators’ valuing of systemic inquiry in schools. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation (Special Issue), 25–53. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582. Klassen, R. M., Bong, M., Usher, E. L., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Wong, I. Y. F., & Georgiou, T. (2009). Exploring the validity of the Teachers' Self-Efficacy Scale in five countries. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 67-76 Knoblauch, D. & Hoy, A. (2008) Maybe I can teach those kids: The influence of contextual factors on student teachers' efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 166-179. Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 60, 981-992. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk-Hoy, A. & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202 - 248.

Author Information

Burcu Senler (presenting / submitting)
Mugla University
Elementary Education
Mugla
Middle East Technical University, Turkey

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.