Transition Practices in the Distributed Curriculum Development in Finnish Vocational Education
Author(s):
Kaisa Kiuttu (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES H 03, Parallel Session H 03

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-13
14:00-15:30
Room:
J 30/109,G, 27
Chair:
Meinert Arnd Meyer

Contribution

Curriculum development is the mainstay of each educational institution. It has effects on the students learning paths and the transitions along the path. However, the transitions from vocational education and training (VET) to working life and to further studies are not widely examined, albeit the fact that they are critical all around the world and many of the challenges are overarching. In this paper, I examine the transition practices manifested in the curriculum development in one Finnish VET organisation. The primary objective is to better understand how the educational professionals promote students’ fluent transitions from VET onwards. In accordance with the objective, the research questions are 1) what kinds of transition practices are manifested in curriculum development, 1a) which practices seem to promote the transition from VET to working life, and 1b) which practices seem to promote the transition from VET to further education.

The study relates to the research of distributed pedagogical leadership as shared organisational practices (Jäppinen 2010). However, it enlarges the concept to distributed curriculum development. It includes examination of transitions, challenging fluent learning paths for students and having a crucial role in ensuring them. Distributed curriculum development is further defined as teachers’ collaboration and learning. It means that teachers are viewed as leaders in the process, i.e. the leadership is shared and distributed among stakeholders in the curriculum development. Transitions are dependent on individual decision making but also on opportunities offered and constraints set by the society and in particular the educational institution. (Schoon & Silbereisen 2009.) Therefore in this paper, transitions are viewed from the perspective of the VET institution, that is, the focus is on the structures, strategies and practices the institution offers through distributed curriculum development for individuals to transfer from the institution to either further education or to working life.

Method

The empirical study utilizes qualitative methods for collecting and analysing the data (Patton 2002). The data was gathered from one big Finnish VET institution with 4000 students and 400 staff members, from culture sector and from the study programme of audiovisual communication. The data consists of observations, interviews, online conversations, and documents. Two meetings were observed. The meetings and the interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The online conversations were collected from the virtual learning environment. Participants included teachers, an education manager and a unit manager. The documents included the national core curricula, VET provider’s curricula and other documents that accompanied the curriculum meetings and discussions in the internet. The data was analysed inductively according to the idea of qualitative content analysis. Firstly, the data was analysed in order to find out what kind of transition practices manifested in the distributed curriculum development. Secondly, the transition practices were categorised into transition strategies. However, the analysis is still in progress.

Expected Outcomes

The results that are presented here are preliminary. According to them the main transition strategies are 1) individualisation, 2) screening out the students, 3) ensuring the key skills, 4) working life based studies, 5) collaboration, and 6) continuous development. Individualisation includes practices that enhance the individuals’ opportunity to carry out one’s own interests, develop one’s talents and orientate oneself to the educational path one prefers. Screening out the students means that the students that get chosen to a certain programme have the capabilities that are required to carry out the studies in that particular field. Ensuring the key skills includes strengthening students’ meta skills, literacy skills and entrepreneurship. Working life based studies means that educational contents of VET must meet the needs of working life. Education must yield the professional skills that are required by working life. Collaboration is essential within educational institution and between educational institutions and home, with the society, as well as on the international level. Continuous development is needed since working life changes and therefore, vocational skill requirements vary. Thus in order to promote fluent transitions, engagement in lifelong learning is required.

References

Borko, Hilda. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33 (8), 3–15. Clandinin, J. & Connolly, F. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. P. Jackson (Ed), Handbook of research on curriculum. New York: Macmillan. Fullan, Michael. (2007). New meaning of educational change. Third edition. New York, Teachers college press. Ingram, Robert, Field, John & Gallacher, Jim. (2009). Learning transitions: research, policy, practice. In John Field, Jim Gallacher &Robert Ingram (Eds.) Researching transitions in lifelong learning. London, Routledge. Jäppinen, Aini-Kristiina. (2010). Preventing early leaving in VET: Distributive pedagogical leadership in characterizing five types of successful organizations. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 62 (3), 297–312. Koukku, Aapo, Kyrö, Matti & Volmari, Kristiina (2009). Finland. VET in Europe – Country Report 2009. ReferNet Finland. Cedefop. Kuiper, Wilmad, Nieveen, Nienke & Visscher-Voerman, Irene. (2003). Curriculum development from technical-professional perspective. In J. Van den Akker, W. Kuiper & U. Hameyer (Eds.) Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 177–198). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. McKenney, Susan & Nieveen, Nienke. (2003). ICT Tools for curriculum development. In J. Van den Akker, W. Kuiper & U. Hameyer (Eds.) Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 119–215). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Patton, Michael Quinn. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, Sage. Schoon, Ingrid & Silbereisen, Rainer K. (2009). Conceptualising school-to-work transitions in context. In Schoon, Ingrid & Silbereisen, Rainer K. (Eds.) Transitions from school to work. Globalization, individualization, and patterns of diversity. The Jacobs Foundation Series on Adolescence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. Van den Akker, W. Kuiper & U. Hameyer (Eds.) Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Author Information

Kaisa Kiuttu (presenting / submitting)
University of Jyväskylä
Jyväskylä

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.