Views of Parents and Schools on Parental Involvement: Evidence from the South East European Region
Author(s):
Jelena Radisic (presenting / submitting) Jelena Radisic (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

14 SES 02 B, Parental Involvement with Schools and Children‘s Education (Part 1)

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-13
15:15-16:45
Room:
K 25/11,G, 51
Chair:
Marta Soler

Contribution

Parental involvement is reported to influence in particular students’ academic performance on both primary and secondary level (Grossman, 1999; Fan & Chen, 2001; Hoover – Dempsey et al., 2005; Bakker et al., 2007; Georgiou & Tourva, 2007; Pomerantz et al., 2007; Koutrouba et al., 2009; Taliaferro et al., 2009). The involvement itself is defined as a multidimensional construct representing many different behaviors and practices at home and at school throughout the entire process of education.  It entails both “parental beliefs and expectations in academic achievement and parental multifaceted behavior at home and in school in order to improve their children’s educational performance” (Koutrouba et al., 2009).

Although parental involvement is sometimes considered as an ‘all-encompassing and imprecise term’; some typologies, nevertheless, exist. The most well-known counts six types of involvement (Epstein & Sanders, 2000): (a) parenting - help in establishing home environments that support children as students; (b) communicating - designing and conducting effective forms of communication about school programs and children’s progress; (c) volunteering - recruiting and organizing help and support for school functions and activities; (d) learning at home - providing information to families how to help their children with homework and curriculum related activities; (e) decision-making - including parents in school decisions; and (f) collaboration with the community at large - identifying and integrating resources and services from the community in strengthen and supporting schools, students and their families.  Various agents contribute to parents being involved. They range from parents’ beliefs and goals for involvement, previous treatment that they received when attempting to interact with the school system, to other engagements and everyday responsibilities accompanying parents’ lives.

In the last decade education systems of all South East European countries have been involved in increasing decentralization of responsibilities related to school governance and adaptation of innovative methods of management. Therefore importance of parental involvement has only recently been recognized in the SEE region, with high concordance on the subject. In 2009 as a part of Advancing Educational Inclusion and Quality in South East Europe Initiative supported by the Education Support Program of the Open Society Institute a Cross-National Survey of Parents in SEE countries took place aiming to provide a panoramic view of parental participation in schools from the perspectives of parents, parent representatives and principals. Study was conducted in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Kosovo (as defined by UNSCHR 1244), Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Romania, and Serbia. Analysis in this paper will be aimed towards general perceptions on parental involvement in subsample of mainstream parents and corresponding schools in all 10 countries, entailing 9215 parents and 317 principals. Regular or mainstream parent distinction refers to a parent whose child attends elementary school, while the parent himself is not a member of school board, PTA or parents’ council nor comes from a socially excluded group.

Method

Variables used in analysis where chosen in light of Epstein’s and Hoover – Dempsey and Sandler’s model of parental involvement and were observed from perspective of different forms of parents’ involvement in school, their perception of general invitations for such activities and perceived obstacles in home - school communication. Factor analysis, using Keiser normalization criteria and Catel scatter diagram, was applied to determine basic dimensions around which parents’ and principals’ perceptions could be organized. For factors with satisfying reliabilities (Cronbach’s alpha>0.7) correlation analysis was used to determine which factors will be used in further hierarchical cluster analysis, which was employed to set out specific profiles of parents and principals in accordance to their specific perceptions. Each profile was analyzed in regards to its particular practices and attitudes. Considering that missing values in analysis were set to exclude cases list wise (only cases with valid values for all variables were included) hierarchical analysis was employed on a smaller number of cases, 4690 parents (out 9215 participants in the study) and 170 principals (out of 317 in the study). Cross-country differences between profiles were considered, with reference to countries for which occurrence of missing data at the country level could question given results.

Expected Outcomes

Findings suggest parents’ and principals’ views could be organized around same basic dimensions and categorized in several groups. In parents’ sample these were: “indifferent” (41%), “against involvement” (20%), “pro involvement group” (14%) and “non-motivated” group (25%). On a country level in Bosnia and Macedonia 51% of parents could be found in the “indifferent” group and quarter of them in the “against involvement” group. The least of the Moldova parents were against involvement, only 8% of them, with most found in Serbia (29%). As for those labeled as “non-motivated” in Croatia, Romania and Serbia 30% of parents falls into that category. In principals’ sample four groups were again derived; “against involvement” (23%), “pro involvement” (33%), “indecisive” (21%) and “ambivalent” group (23%). Parents generally perceive that they had little opportunities for involvement, as an opposite to principals’ views. Also in parents accounts there seems to be no clear distinction between various involvement opportunities. Both sides recognize how all could contribute to a more effective communication, but remain indecisive on roles both parents and schools should seize in the process. Categories such as providing good teaching, safety, making sure the child does good at school seem not to suffice any more.

References

Bakker, J., Denessen, E. and Brus-Laeven, M. (2007). Socio-economic background, parental involvement and teacher perceptions of these in relation to pupil achievement. Educational Studies, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 177–192 Epstein, J. & Sanders, M. (2000). Connecting home, school, and community: new directions for social research, in (ed.) Hallinan, M. Handbook of the sociology of education, New York, Kluwer Fan, X. and Chen, M. (2001). Parental Involvement and Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1-22 Georgiou, S. N. and Tourva, A. (2007). Parental attributions and parental involvement Social Psychology of Education. Vol.10, No. 4, pp. 73–482 Grossman, S. (1999). Examining the origins of our beliefs about parents. Childhood Education; Vol. 76, No.1, pp. 24 – 27 Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Walker, J. M. T., Sandler, H. M., Whetsel, D., Green, C.L., Wilkins, A.S. and Closson, K. (2005). Why Do Parents Become Involved? Research Findings and Implications, The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 106, No. 2, pp. 105-130 Koutrouba, K., Antonopoulou, E., Tsitsas, G. and Zenakou, E. (2009). An Investigation of Greek Teachers’ Views on Parental Involvement in Education, School Psychology International, Vol. 30(3): 311–328. Pop, D.; Powwel, S.; Miljević, G. and Crighton, J. (2009) School governance and social inclusion: involvement of parents: south-east Europe cross-countries survey of principals' views. Ljubljana: Faculty of Education, Centre for Educational Policy Studies Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A and Litwack, S. D. (2007). The How, Whom, and Why of Parents’ Involvement in Children’s Academic Lives: More Is Not Always Better. Review of Educational research, Vol. 77; No. 3; pp. 373-410 Taliaferro, J.D., DeCuir-Gunby, J. and Allen-Eckard, K. (2009). ‘I can see parents being reluctant’: perceptions of parental involvement using child and family teams in schools, Child and Family Social Work, Vol. 14, pp 278–288.

Author Information

Jelena Radisic (presenting / submitting)
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade
Department of Psychology
Belgrade
Jelena Radisic (presenting / submitting)
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Serbia, Republic of

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.