Perceived Instructor Affective Support in Relation to Achievement Approach Goal Orientations, Academic Enjoyment, and Motivation in College Classrooms
Author(s):
Gonul Sakiz (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 08 B, Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Higher Education

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-15
08:30-10:00
Room:
L 202,1 FL., 37
Chair:
Rosemary Deem

Contribution

Introduction
Teacher support plays a significant role on students' learning, academic emotions, and motivation at all developmental levels. Although recently a growing number of studies has examined the affective side of teacher support on students’ emotional well-being, academic and social behaviors and motivation from early childhood  to high school (Baker, Grant, & Morlock, 2008; Muller, Katz, & Dance, 1999; Sakiz, 2007; Silver, Measelle, Armstrong, & Essex, 2010), our knowledge about the influence of perceived instructor affective support on college students’ emotional and motivational outcomes in college environments is still limited. Chen’s (2000) inquiry on teacher-student relationships in a college setting revealed that college students were not satisfied with the way instructors communicate with them. Based on college teachers' and students' responses to various open-ended questions, several instructor behaviors related positively to student motivation in class were identified as respect, caring, interest in and concern for students, high expectations, fairness, and encouragement (Gorham & Christophel, 1992; Gorham & Millette, 1997). In a recent study by Sakiz (2007), all dimensions of affective behaviors of teachers, given in theory and research, were brought together and the construct called Perceived Teacher Affective Support was developed. The variables within the construct were caring, respect, concern for and interest in students, valuing, recognizing, treating fairly, holding high expectations, encouraging, and listening. In the current study, the Affective Support construct used with early adolescents was expanded by including more verbal and nonverbal behaviors. The new added features based on related research were smiling, kindness, and sense of humor.
In the present study, Perceived Instructor Affective Support was examined in relation to achievement approach goal orientations, academic enjoyment, and behavioral engagement. These motivational and emotional variables have been reported to have powerful influences on students' learning in classrooms at different developmental levels (Elliot & McGregor, 2001; Pekrun, Goezt, Titz, & Perry, 2002; Wolters, 2004).
Research Question and Hypotheses
The major research question of this study was the following: What are the relationships among perceived instructor affective support, achievement approach goal orientations, academic enjoyment, and behavioral engagement of college students in social science courses? It was hypothesized that perceived instructor affective support would be directly and indirectly positively associated with college students’ approach goals, academic enjoyment, and engagement behaviors in social science courses. A hypothesized structural model was presented.

Method

Participants Two hundred and fifty-eight college students enrolled in a teacher training department of a major university in Turkey participated. The average age of the students was 20.85 (SD = 1.64). Female participants (n=164, 63.6%) were greater than male participants (n=81, 31.4%). Thirteen students did not respond to the gender question. Instrument Items measuring instructor affective support were adopted from Sakiz (2007); items assessing achievement approach goal orientations were taken from Elliot & McGregor (2001); items measuring academic enjoyment were taken from Academic Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ) (Pekrun et al., 2005). The internal consistency reliability outcomes for all scales were satisfactory. Procedure Participants responded to the survey items with respect to the instructor and the course they were taking just before the class where the survey was administered. Using this method, developed by Plax, Kearney, McCroskey, & Richmond (1986), a wide range of courses (e.g.,educational psychology, child development, special education, and school management) and the instructors were presented on the data. Data Analysis Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used for data analysis.

Expected Outcomes

Results The confirmatory factor analysis for the extended version of Perceived Instructor Affective Support Scale and the hypothesized structural model provided adequate fit to the given data. Based on results, the perceived instructor affective support was significantly positively related to mastery approach goal orientation [β = .515, p < .001], performance approach goal orientation [β = .322, p < .001], and academic enjoyment [β = .322, p < .001]. Other correlations were also presented. Discussion Findings of the current study showed that perceived instructor affective support matters in higher education institutions as much as it matters in K12 classrooms. The perceived instructor affective support was either directly and/or indirectly positively related to college students’ achievement goal orientations, academic enjoyment, and behavioral engagement in a variety of social science courses. These findings reveals the importance of nurturing affective learning environments in college classrooms because such academic climates can help students internalize and model affective behaviors in their own personal interactions with each other and later demonstrate those behaviors with their own students in their own classrooms. Therefore, instructors in teacher training departments need to be more aware of these affective behaviors and demonstrate them more often in their own actions. Moreover, offering courses fostering awareness and development of affective behaviors, especially in teacher training departments, is a necessary action to take for teacher trainers.

References

Baker, J. A., Grant, S., & Morlock. L. (2008). The teacher-student relationships a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 3-15. Elliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (3), 501-519. Gorham, J. & Millette, D. M. (1997). A comparative analysis of teacher and student perceptions of sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 46(4), 245-261. Muller, C., Katz, S. R., & Dance, L. J. (1999). Investing in Teaching and Learning: Dynamics of the teacher-student relationship from each actor’s perspective. Urban Education, 34(3), 292-337. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2005). Academic Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ) User’s Manual. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy, and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55. Sakiz, G. (2007). Does teacher affective support matter? An investigation of the relationship among perceived teacher affective support, sense of belonging, academic emotions, academic self-efficacy beliefs, and academic effort in middle school mathematics classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Silver, R. B., Measelle, J. R., Armstrong, J. M., & Essex, M. J. (2010, article in press). The impact of parents, child care providers, teachers, and peers on early externalizing trajectories. Journal of School Psychology. Wolters, C. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(3), 281-299.

Author Information

Gonul Sakiz (presenting / submitting)
Marmara University
Department of Elementary Education
Istanbul

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.