Significant Variables for the Academic Performance from the Perspective of Freshmen

Session Information

22 SES 9.5 PE/PS, Poster Exhibition / Poster Session

Time:
2011-09-15
12:00-13:30
Room:
Seminarzentrum - Posters
Chair:

Contribution

With the adaptation to the EHEA, the current university system in Spain is characterized by, among others, a learning approach more focused in the student than in the teacher. This implies a methodological change both in teaching and student training in competencies and skills. Therefore, it is important that the student attends to classes and participates actively in them assuming the leading role of the learning process.

The present work is part of a wider research on the best freshmen and their practices at the Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV)[1]. We show the outcome of their evaluations about the personal learning process in which they are involved in order to obtain the better academic records. We have analyzed the reasons involved in the choice of a degree and a university. We have also considered the factors that facilitate the integration in the school and in the university. On the other hand, we have also studied their assessment about teachers, classes, subjects, classmates, and themselves.

Firstly, we have analyzed which factors are involved with classes: which classes are the most valued ones, which characteristics have the worst ones, their own attitude, and their own impressions about university classes. Secondly, we have considered topics related to the preparation of classes: time dedicated out of the sessions, previous knowledge required, and time spent in other non-academic tasks related with the subjects.


[1] [1] Research Project “La excelencia en los estudiantes universitarios desde un enfoque longitudinal: Análisis de factores incidentes y diseño de un modelo de intervención”, supported by MICIN, reference EDU2009-08518 directed by Bernardo Gargallo.

Method

Our methodology is qualitative. To assess students' opinion we have elaborated a questionnaire addressed to freshmen that mainly consists on open questions since we are interested in knowing their opinions and thoughts. It was to be filled two months after the beginning of the academic course, once freshmen already know subjects, teachers, and the dynamics. The information has been processed doing a triangulation of experts who categorized the answers given by the students and analyzed the content. The sample consists on 300 freshmen from 11 degrees of 9 schools of the UPV. Half of them were the students who enrolled in these degrees with the highest university access marks. The other half has been chosen following the criterion that their university access marks were closed to the mean of the university access marks of the students enrolled at each one of the degrees. These results let us to compare, among other things, the time and method that students used in the university compared to the ones used during the last year of post-compulsory secondary education. We report the similarities and differences between both groups of students.

Expected Outcomes

We briefly point out the most significant conclusions: the usefulness of prior knowledge that students have from secondary education in order to follow up certain subjects during the first academic year, the relationship between the number of hours dedicated to personal study during the last year of post-compulsory secondary education and the number of hours spent in the university, and the adoption of a participative/receptive role in the classes. This attitude can be considered in several ways: attention paid to explanations, to take notes, and to pose questions to the teacher. A well-known underlying problem that also arises is the attendance to the classes and its relation with the academic performance (Fernández-Enguita, 2010). We will support this link showing the existing relation between the involvement of the student in his/her learning process, class attendance, and a high academic performance.

References

Fernández-Enguita, M. (2010): Absentismo y fracaso en la Universidad. En Jornada sobre la dimensión social de la educación universitaria en España. Valencia, Universidad de Valencia, 26-27 de octubre. Fernández Rodríguez, C. (1994): Aprender a estudiar. Cómo resolver las dificultades en el estudio. Madrid: Pirámide. Hernández Díaz, F. (1996): Metodología del estudio. Cómo estudiar con rapidez y eficacia. Santafé de Bogotá: McGraw-Hill, Salas Parrilla, M. (2007): Cómo preparar exámenes con eficacia. Madrid: Alianza editorial. Tierno Jiménez, B. (1994): Las mejores técnicas de estudio: saber leer, tomar apuntes y preparar exámenes. Madrid: Ediciones Temas.

Author Information

Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación
Valencia
Cristina Rodríguez Monzonís (presenting / submitting)
Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain
Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain
Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain
Universidad de Valencia (University of Valencia)
Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación
Valencia

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.