We have all been left behind! At least if we are to believe the results from international comparative studies like PISA and TIMMS. Educational reforms at national level are often justified in relation to this kind of comparative study and to the rhetoric of “there is no alternative” due to international competiveness.

This paper is based on a meta-analysis of earlier research relating to how the last decade’s reforms in Sweden concerning national tests, earlier grading and an increased focus on criterion-referenced grading changes the prerequisites for teachers’ work and their professional development, identity and relations, and, more specifically, how such reforms lead to dilemmas that affect their everyday work. Ironically, rather than solving a certain kind of problem or dilemma, inconsiderate political proposals and “easy-fix” whims at policy level that are not always applicable to teachers’ work sometimes cause new dilemmas (cf. Biesta, 2007; Norwich, 2010). The difference between a problem and a dilemma is that the former can be solved to satisfaction, whereas the latter cannot be satisfactorily solved but leaves some kind of reminder (Denicolo, 1996; Berlak & Berlak, 1981).

The theoretical framework draws on the concept of dilemmatic space and aims to offer a more complex understanding of dilemmas and their positioning and relations (cf. Honig, 1996). Approaching educational settings through the lens of dilemmatic space implies always considering teachers’ work in relation to the dynamics of individual, social, political and contextual factors. Seen as a wider system, the concept of dilemmatic space analytically opens additional dimensions, such as possibilities to connect the dilemmas of teachers’ everyday work with the influences, constraints and considerations of the local community and with reforms, intentions or statements at different policy levels.

We argue that dilemmas should not be regarded as specific events or situations, but as being ever present in people’s living “spaces”. That is, people do not just acknowledge dilemmas as specific situations to react to, but always “react” in relation to “dilemmatic spaces.” As a consequence, dilemmas are not “out there” per se, but are social constructions resulting from political decisions that underlie contextual conditions. The concept of dilemmatic space makes it possible to approach what individuals construe as dilemmatic. Such an analytical move also makes it possible to visualise how dilemmas emerge in a space between individuals and a specific context (Fransson & Grannäs, submitted). For teachers, it means that in their work they sometimes find themselves in dilemmatic situations that are characterised by micro-political manoeuvres and where their judgment forms the basis for relational work expressed e.g. through negotiations and the positioning of others (cf. Frelin, 2010).

In this paper we analyse how the last decade’s reforms of national tests and earlier grading and an increased focus on criterion-referenced grading in a goal-oriented approach have changed the prerequisites for teachers’ work, professional development, identity and relations.

Berlak, A. & Berlak, H. (1981). Dilemmas of schooling. Teaching and social change. New York: Methuen Publishing Ltd. Biesta, G. (2007). Why ‘what works’’ won´t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory 57(1), 1–22. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. (3. ed.) Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. Denicolo, P. (1996). Productively Confronting Dilemmas in Educational Practice and Research, In Kompf, M., Bond, R., Dworet, D., Boak, T. (eds.). Changing research and practice. Teachers’ professionalism, identities and knowledge, (pp. 56–65), London: Falmer Press. Fransson & Grannäs (forthcoming). What´s the Point in Doing School Tasks Without Grades? Analyzing Dilemmas in Educational Settings. Paper to be submitted. Fransson & Grannäs (submitted). Dilemmatic Spaces in Educational Contexts — Towards a conceptual framework for dilemmas in teachers work. Submitted August 2010 to Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. Frelin, A. (2010). Teachers' Relational Practices and Professionality. Dissertation. Uppsala University: Uppsala. Honig, B. (1996). Difference, Dilemmas, and the Politics of Home. In S. Benhabib (ed). Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. (p. 257 – 277). Klapp Lekholm, A. & Cliffordson, C. (2008). Discrepancies between school grades and test scores at individual and school level: effects of gender and family background. Educational Research and Evaluation. 14(2). 181–199. Norwich, B. (2010). Dilemmas of difference, curriculum and disability: international, Perspectives, Comparative Education, 46(2), 113–135. Skolverket (2009). [Equal-value grading in upper secondary school? An analysis of the connection between national tests and final grades] Skolverket rapport 338. Stockholm: Skolverket. Vetenskapsrådet (2010). [Swedish research on assessment – an overview]. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 2010:2. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet. Wikström, C. (2005). Grade stability in a criterion-referenced grading system: the Swedish example Assessment in Education. 12(2). 125–144.