Learning for Competence Development in Professional Contexts: Positioning Practical Simulations
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

02 SES 11 A, Designing Competence Development Environments: Practical Simulations, Project-Based Learning, Hybrid Learning Environments

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-15
16:45-18:15
Room:
K 23/21,1 FL., 36
Chair:
Michael Gessler

Contribution

In secondary and higher vocational education the role of professional contexts has increased significantly, especially with the introduction of competence-based education (Wesselink, 2010). This is not surprising, considering the intended learning outcomes of modern education; students need to develop integrated knowledge, skills, and attitudes (i.e. competencies) (Biemans et al., 2009). Research shows that learning in professional contexts, especially workplace learning, is not automatically effective and efficient and that these learning environments are not fully used to their potential (Onstenk & Blokhuis, 2007). Learning in constructed learning environments (e.g. practical simulations) should therefore not be underestimated and be seen as an integrated part of learning for professions (Fuller, Hodkinson, Hodkinson, & Unwin, 2005). The question remains, however, what the potential of various types of (constructed) professional learning environments is in the context of competence-based education? And can they be effective for stimulating competency development?

 

Proposed paper will study the design principles and the (potential) learning outcomes of practical simulations (i.e. constructed learning environments) by positioning them in relation to other professional learning environments. This will be apprenticeship and project-based workplace learning, as these are two often used professional learning contexts in Dutch and in other European secondary- and higher vocational education programmes, certainly in competence-based education. Practical simulations were originally developed for learning specific procedural and technical skills in authentic contexts, and are still being used and examined this way (Kneebone, 2005). Indications of developing competencies through practical simulations are absent. Nonetheless, some researchers address the potential of practical simulations for stimulating non-technical skills and carefully formulate design principles for competence-based practical simulations (Gaba, 2004). In competence-based practical simulations, students, for example, simulate an office hour at the animal clinic performing all involved activities, instead of only practicing the technical skill of examining an animal. The research questions of this study are: 1) What are the typical learning environment characteristics of practical simulations, and how do they differ from other professional learning contexts (i.e. apprenticeship and project-based workplace learning )? 2) What traditional learning outcomes, as well as competencies, can typically be developed in practical simulations, and how does this differ from learning outcomes in other professional learning contexts?

 

The theoretical framework that is being used for this study is the Model of Powerful Learning Environments (de Bruijn & Leeman, 2011). The model of PLEs includes several design principles that are specifically important for competence-based vocational education. Based on extensive research, the model is a combination of traditional principles, like direct instruction, and innovative principles, like active and reflective learning. Each principle is worked-out in concrete powerful- and less powerful learning environment characteristics.

 

This paper will not only contribute to learning environment theory, but also aims to provide educationalists a workable overview of how to design professional learning contexts, especially practical simulations, for intended learning outcomes. Thereby, explicating the added value of using practical simulation in competence-based education.

 

Method

To answer the research questions, both a literature study and a questionnaire was used. The literature study consisted of a systematic review of peer-reviewed articles from relevant journals. Analysis of the articles resulted in an overview of learning environment characteristics (according to the PLE model) and types of learning outcomes of practical simulations, apprenticeship, and project-based workplace learning. Because little research has been conducted on competence development as learning outcome, additional information was collected about what competencies are addressed in the three professional learning contexts in current Dutch agricultural vocational and higher education. Teachers in secondary and higher agricultural vocational education indicated through a questionnaire which of the 25 competencies, as defined for all Dutch vocational education trajectories (COLO, 2006), were developed in their professional learning environment (20 practical simulation, 20 apprenticeship, 20 project-based workplace learning). Analysis of variance shows what type of competencies could typically be developed in practical simulations, compared to the other two types of professional learning contexts according to the teachers. To conclude, synthesis of the results of both studies describes salient learning environment characteristics and learning outcomes typical for practical simulations after comparing them to other professional learning contexts.

Expected Outcomes

Preliminary results show that practical simulations have quite a few powerful learning environments characteristics, especially concerning student guidance. The roles and activities of teachers are made more explicit in practical simulations compared to apprenticeships and project-based workplace learning. The literature review also demonstrates that learning outcomes of professional learning contexts mainly focus on knowledge- and skills development and scarcely on competence development, particularly in the case of practical simulations. Collected data indicate what competencies are typically stimulated through learning in practical simulations according to teachers and how that differs from competence development in the other professional learning contexts. This analysis typifies the added value of practical simulations as professional learning environment part of a competence-based educational curriculum. However, data revealed a large variety of practical simulations in current educational practice. These are not always implement as illustrated in the literature review. Therefore, subsequent research intends to examine the characteristics of the (variety of) of practical simulations in terms of their powerfulness for stimulating competence development.

References

Biemans, H., Wesselink, R., Gulikers, J., Schaafsma, S., Verstegen, J., & Mulder, M. (2009). Towards Competence-Based VET: Dealing with the Pitfalls. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 61(3), 267-286. COLO. (2006). Competentiemodel Kenniscentra Beroepsonderwijs Bedrijfsleven [Competence model of Knowledge centre for Vocational education and Industry]. Retrieved August 5, 2010, from http://www.kwalificatiesmbo.nl de Bruijn, E., & Leeman, Y. (2011). Authentic and self-directed learning in vocational education: Challenges to vocational educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, In Press, Corrected Proof. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.007 Fuller, A., Hodkinson, H., Hodkinson, P., & Unwin, L. (2005). Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: a reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning. British Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 49 - 68. Gaba, D. M. (2004). The future vision of simulation in health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(suppl 1), i2-i10. Kneebone, R. M. B. (2005). Evaluating Clinical Simulations for Learning Procedural Skills: A Theory-Based Approach. Academic Medicine, 80(6), 549-553. Onstenk, J., & Blokhuis, F. (2007). Apprenticeship in The Netherlands: connecting school- and work-based learning. Education + Training, 49(6), 489 - 499. Wesselink, R. (2010). Comprehensive competence-based vocational education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wageningen University, Wageningen.

Author Information

Anne Khaled (presenting / submitting)
Wageningen University
Education and Competence Studies
Wageningen
Wageningen University, Netherlands, The
Wageningen University, Netherlands, The
Wageningen University, Netherlands, The

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.