Session Information
05 SES 08 A, Urban Education and Children and Youth at Risk (Ethnographic Research)
Paper Session
Contribution
According to Heath et al. (2009), «youth research is distinctive because of the relative powerlessness of young people within the research process itself when compared with other groups» (2009: 8), being frequently unaware of the risk involved in their participation in research about their experience and views (Allen, 2002).
Principles for ethically sound research require informed consent (Wiles et al. 2005), guaranteeing anonymity and confidentiality. Nevertheless, there is little awareness of the impact that our ethical decisions might have in participants’ lives.
The dilemma underlying this paper is: what should we do with particular and sensitive information given by participants or observed during fieldwork?
This paper explores a particular issue concerning “uncomfortable” information that came up during a two-year ethnographic study in a Youth Centre in the North of Portugal in a context of social and material deprivation. I was confronted by the information that a 16 year- old young girl, Diana, was working illegally and being exploited in a textile factory. Diana told me how this first working experience after her forced school drop-out was important on different levels. The first thought was to report this situation. However, the consequence of reporting this case to authorities could be that Diana would lose her job and be lost for several months, becoming more vulnerable without any money, in a constant conflict with her family.
The dilemma was to decide if I should or should not help Diana directly, knowing that good intentions in helping could cause more harm than benefit. To report this situation to the authorities was ethically in juxtaposition with anonymity and respect of privacy.
In order to respect her dignity in the research project and to respect her dignity as a vulnerable worker explored in the labor market, I tried above all to avoid becoming a threat (Lee, 1999).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Allen, Debby (2002) “Research Involving Vulnerable Young People: a discussion of ethical and methodological concerns”, Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 3, 275-283(9). Fitzgerald, Maureen H. (2006) Ethnography, Ethnographic Moments, the Ethics-Review Process and the Construction of Knowledge. Available at: http://www.ethicsproject.com/documents/Ethnographyandethicsreview.pdf. Heath, Sue; Brooks, Rachel; Cleaver, Elisabeth; Ireland, Eleanor (2009) Researching Young People’s Lives. London: Sage Publications. Honkatukia, Päivi; Nyqvist, Leo; Pösö ,Tarja (2003) “Sensitive Issues in Vulnerable Conditions: Studying Violence in Youth Residential”, Young, 11, 323-339. Lee, Raymond M. (1999) Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. London: Sage Publications. Wiles, Rose; Heath, Sue; Crow, Graham; Charles, Vikki (2005) Informed Consent in Social Research:A Literature Review. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper, NCRM/001 (2005). Available at: www.ncrm.ac.uk/research/outputs/publications/methodsreview/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-001.pdf Willis, Paul (2000) The Ethnographic Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.