How Effort in School Contributes to Explain Gender Differences in Academic Achievement.
Author(s):
Elin Borg (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 07, Parallel Session C 07

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-12
13:30-15:00
Room:
JK 27/106,G, 42
Chair:
Johanna Hochstetter

Contribution

Research on inequality in school has a long tradition within sociology and educational science. Especially gender differences in academic achievement have been debated for decades. Feminist research in the 1970s and early 1980s argued that girls were being marginalized in school, and as a result had poor results in mathematics and science, and to a lesser degree progressed to higher education. This inequality was seen as grounded in systematic discrimination from male classmates, teachers and the school system itself. From the mid 1990s the discourse on gender inequality in school shifted from a girl’s point of view to a boys’. Boys were found to underperform in most subjects in school compared to girls, and a growing concern for the male role in school was being expressed in research and media.

In the last decades both boys and girls have increased their academic achievement, girls more than boys. Girls have closed the gender gap in mathematics and science. Resent research find that boys’ lower achievement is concentrated to specific subjects in school, such as reading/writing and language subjects. Changes in the cultural context in school have raised new questions in the debate of educational differences. Minority students on average are found to achieve lower marks compared to majority students, and gender differences in academic achievement are found to be smaller for minority students compared to the majority.

Since the gender gap in achievement is well established, researchers have been trying to explain why boys do not perform as well as girls in school. It has become an important research topic because achievement is connected to labour marked outcomes, and a way to identify possible violations of equal opportunities in education. There remains a lack of information about what causes these differences. One hypothesis is that girls work harder and take school more seriously than boys. This discussion relates to a ‘boys will be boys’ discourse, were gender roles are seen as essential for boys and girls effort on schoolwork. Working hard in school is in this perspective seen as “feminine”, while ‘having a laugh’ and effortlessness is seen as masculine.

The current study was conducted to examine how effort in school contributes to explain the gender differences in academic achievement for students with majority and minority background. Few studies have combined a gender perspective with ethnic background when looking at differences in school achievement. The ones that do either do not differentiate between different ethnic groups, and/or they threat gender and ethnicity separately in the analyses. This study compares majority students with Norwegian background with students with background from Pakistan. This minority group is interesting as a comparison group, firstly because it is the largest non-western minority group in Norway, and secondly because immigrants from Pakistan are found to have one of the most gender segregated labour forces compared to other immigrant groups in Norway.

Method

Participants: Data were obtained from the cross-sectional survey, “Young in Oslo”, distributed among students in secondary school in Oslo in 2006. The purpose of the study was originally to explore the living conditions of youths in Oslo, and covers a wide variety of questions. The survey has a representative sample of students in Oslo schools aged 14-17 and was conducted in 9th and 10th grade of lower secondary school and first year of upper secondary school. 91 secondary schools in Oslo participated. In total 11,347 students participated, equally distributed by gender (50,7 per cent girls, N=5805, 48,4 per cent boys, N=5542), with a response rate of 92.7 per cent. Measures: School Grade, Gender, Socioeconomic status (SES), Ethnicity. Homework effort (latent), Lack of effort (latent). Achievement (self reported marks in Norwegian, English and mathematics). Statistical analyses: To account for mean gender differences in achievement in the Norwegian and Pakistani samples, cross tabulation analyses were conducted controlling for social background. Analyses in the framework of structural equation modelling were conducted to construct the latent variables and to perform path analyses. Two-group analyses were used to compare students with background from Pakistan with students with majority background (parents born in Norway).

Expected Outcomes

The results supports national research that the academic differences between majority students and minority students is reduced when social background is introduced, but the gender differences in academic achievement is not affected. Gender differences in academic achievement are also found to vary between subjects in school. The largest gender differences are found in Norwegian, and the gender gap is larger in the Norwegian sample compared to the Pakistani sample. In English the gender differences are smaller and about the same in both samples. In mathematics no gender difference was found when the connection gender, subject and ethnicity was studied. The results show that girls do work harder than boys in school and that boys to a larger extent show lack of effort in classrooms. The analyses also show that Pakistani students work harder compared to majority students. Especially Pakistani girls tended to put in more effort in school compared to other students. Likewise, the analyses show that majority students put in the least effort in school of the two groups. Another finding is that the effect of working harder explains more of the gender variation in the Pakistani sample, and less in the Norwegian sample.

References

Bakken, A. (2009b). Ulikhet på tvers. Har foreldres utdanning, kjønn og minoritetsstatus like stor betydning for elevers karakterer på alle skoler? Oslo: Norsk insitutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring (NOVA). Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Hay, V., & Maw, J. (2009). Failing boys? New York: Open University Press. Francis, B., & Skelton, C. (2008). Reassessing Gender and Achievement. London and New York: Routledge. Freudenthaler, H. H., Spinath, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2008). Predicting school achievement in boys and girls. European Journal of Personality, 22(3), 231-245. Gorard, S., Rees, G., & Salisbury, J. (2001). Investigating the patterns of differential attainment of boys and girls at school. British Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 125-139. Kenney-Benson, G. A., Pomerantz, E. M., Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2006). Sex differences in math performance: The role of children's approach to schoolwork. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 11-26. Kjærnsli, M., Lie, S., Olsen, R. V., & Roe, A. (2007). Tid for tunge løft : norske elevers kompetanse i naturfag, lesing og matematikk i PISA 2006. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. Lauglo, J. (1999). Working harder to make the grade: Immigrant youth in Norwegian Schools. Journal of Youth Studies, 2, 77-100. Marks, G. N. (2008). Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and mathematics: evidence from 31 countries. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 89-109. Opheim, V., & Støren, L. A. (2001). Innvandrerungdom og majoritetsungdom gjennom videregående til høyere utdanning. Utdanningsforløp, utdanningsaspirasjoner og realiserte utdanningsvalg. (Vol. 7). Oslo: Norsk institutt for studier av forskning og utdanning (NIFU). Salisbury, J., Rees, G., & Gorard, S. (1999). Accounting for the differential attainment of boys and girls at school. School Leadership & Management, 19(4), 403-426.

Author Information

Elin Borg (presenting / submitting)
Univerity of Oslo
Institute of Educational Research
Oslo

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.