Session Information
27 SES 10 C, Cooperative Teaching and Learning Forms
Paper Session
Contribution
Research questions, objectives and theoretical framework
It has been widely recognised that in order to explain processes of self-regulated learning, consideration of the social regulatory aspects should not be left behind especially when we try to explain the quality and effectiveness of collaborative learning processes. The inclusion of the social dimension in the traditional self-regulation of learning models have had two directions: on one side, the socio-cognitive models conceive the social as influencing self-regulatory processes and, on the other side, the sociocultural models define regulatory processes as intrinsically social. It has been argued that in order to give a more complete account of the regulation processes occurring during collaborative learning, there must be an explicit consideration of self and social aspects of regulation, and the avoidance of reductionism to the individual or the collectives to which they belong (Akkerman et al, 2007; Hadwin & Oshige 2011; Iiskala et al, 2004; Volet, Vauras & Salonen, 2009).
From the literature of learning in groups, research on collaborative interactions indicates that learning is facilitated by groups’ coordinated engagement in the shared problem space or in a joint activity (Roschelle & Teasley, 1995; Volet, Summers & Thurman, 2009). Therefore, the social regulation phenomenon seems to be a key issue when we try to explain learning outcomes through group-work interactions.
Following the conceptualization of self, co-regulation, and shared regulation described by Iiskala et al (2004), and the concept of co-regulation defined by Volet et al (2009) the current paper presents a study attempting to integrate the self and social aspects of regulation in learning contexts through an integration of analysis models applied to collaborative learning activities in primary school. Thus, the research questions are basically, How can we integrate individual and social levels in the analysis of collaborative learning activities in primary school? In which ways these two levels are related? How can the episodes of social regulation be described and which dimensions are related to their emergence? In which way the specific contexts of activity facilitate – or not- the development of shared regulation?
The relevance of the study relates to 3 issues: the attempt to develop a framework of analysis integrating self and social aspects of regulation using an innovative methodology of data analysis; the advance on the description of shared regulation episodes during collaborative activities in natural contexts and the conditions of emergence; and the contribution to the study of children working together and regulating each other during the first years of schooling, who are relatively under-represented in studies of self-regulated learning as much as collaborative group-work.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Akkerman, S., Van de Bossche, P., Admiraal, W., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Simons, R.-J., et al. (2007). Reconsidering group cognition: From conceptual confusion to a boundary area between cognitive and socio-cultural perspectives? Educational Research Review, 2(1), 39-63. Grau, V. (2008). Self-regulated learning and conceptual development in biology: A naturalistic study with primary school children. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, UK. Hadwin, A.F., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and socially-shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. TC Record, online May 2010. Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Socially shared metacognition in peer-learning? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1, 147-178. Roschelle, J. & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem-solving. In C. O`Malley (Ed.) Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-197). Berlin: Springer. Volet, S., Vauras, M. & Salonen, P.(2009). Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44 (4), 215-226. Volet, S., Summers, M. & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19, 128-143.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.