Working with Whiteness in the U.S. and Europe: Reframing the Dialogue on Urban Education
Author(s):
Taharee Jackson (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES D 01, Parallel Session D 01

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-12
15:10-16:40
Room:
JK 29/124,G, 42
Chair:
Joana da Silveira Duarte

Contribution

 

What does it mean to be white in nations that are increasingly black and brown?  What is the role of European teachers in urban schools with growing numbers of non-European students?  The United States and multiple countries are experiencing influxes of immigrants who are not of European descent (Banks, 2008; Unites States Department of Education, 2011; Villegas & Lucas, 2002).  In the U.S., non-white citizens are projected to equal the number of white citizens in 2045 (Henderson, 2000).  The U.S. is also experiencing growing numbers of European American teachers who comprise a disproportionate 90% of the teaching force (Cornbleth, 2008; Sleeter, 2001).  Likewise, continued influxes of Turkish populations to Germany, Algerians to France, and African-Caribbeans to Britain prompt these countries to pose similar questions about how best to handle the opportunity, not challenge, of our demographic shifts.   

 

Traditionally, the U.S. has handled such questions regarding population change and the education of non-whites in urban settings less well than our European counterparts.  We have framed the influx of non-European citizens as:  1) a challenge, not opportunity, 2) a minority, not majority problem, and 3) a costly, unwanted investment (Leonardo, 2009; Feagin, 2010).  To continue as thriving, globally competitive countries, the U.S. and other European nations must reframe the dialogue about urban education and the preparation of teachers for urban schools in far different terms (Banks, 2004; Spring, 2009).  If we are to survive as societies that welcome growth, advancement, and national security, we must embrace more critical semantics and fundamentally upturned paradigms, practices, and policies in urban education.

 

In pursuit of more global viability in the U.S. and other countries, I conducted a two-part study within a larger “expertise research” tradition aimed at determining best practices in urban education and urban teacher education.  The research was guided by critical race theory and culturally relevant pedagogy.  Critical race theory considers the endemic nature of racism in the structures of societies (Delgado & Stefancic, 2001).  Educational researchers in the U.S. (Ladson-Billings & Tate, 2006) and Europe (Gillborn, 2005) use this theory to examine the underachievement of urban students in multiracial countries.  Similarly, culturally relevant pegagogy (Ladson-Billings) is a pedagogical approach aimed at helping teachers produce academic excellence, cultural pride, and critical consciousness in all students.  Both theoretical frameworks provide the underpinnings of this research, which focused on these questions:

 

1)  How do European American educators conceptualize race, whiteness, and culturally relevant pedagogy in urban education?

2)  How are European American educators’ conceptualizations of race, whiteness, and culturally relevant pedagogy manifested in their teaching practices?

3)  What are the life experiences that inform European American educators’ conceptualizations of race, whiteness, and their commitments to antiracism, multiculturalism, and urban education? 

 

Drawing on the literature, scholarship, and practices of the U.S., Great Britian, Germany, and France, I address key questions about how to prepare educators of European descent for urban schools and reframe our international views of urban education altogether.  The U.S. and many European countries stand to benefit from the findings.

 

Method

These studies were aimed at learning how best to educate European American educators for diverse and changing urban schools. In Part I, I interviewed and observed a nominated sample of European American, multicultural educators who are explicitly dedicated to teaching non-European children. In Part II, I interviewed nationally renowned European American scholars, antiracist activists, and multicultural teacher educators who are committed to preparing globally competent teachers for urban schools and reshaping societies for more inclusion, diversity, and social justice (Arnove & Torres, 2003). Both studies followed a qualitative, “collective case” study design. This design allowed gathering an in-depth understanding of how European American teachers conceptualize race, whiteness, and culturally relevant pedagogy, and how those understandings informed their urban teaching. I used multiple data sources—transcripts from in-depth, phenomenological interviews; interview field notes; and field notes from at least one classroom observation; and the educators’ own published scholarship—to understand the racial conceptualizations, classroom practices, and life experiences of culturally relevant, antiracist white educators. Data were analyzed using the tenets of critical race theory and culturally relevant pedagogy to examine the degree of alignment between the educators’ stated, practiced, and idealized beliefs about urban education.

Expected Outcomes

The research yields important findings about how the U.S. and European countries might best prepare educators for changing urban schools and reframe the dialogue on urban education writ large: 1. Teach social injustice as embedded, pervasive, and propagated by institutions. These studies unearthed the inability of European American educators to articulate social injustice as more than individual acts of meanness. Urban teacher education must equip white teachers to situate ethnic conflicts in institutions, not individuals. 2. Encourage Europeans and European Americans to envision cultural, not absolute democracies. Effective urban educators must envision their nations as changing spheres, not static or strictly defined by white normativity. 3. Reframe plurality in urban education as opportunity, not challenge. Urban education must not be framed as a challenge or burden, but an opportunity to grow as European peoples and nations. 4. Refocus multicultural education on the majority, not minority. Multicultural, antiracist, urban education should focus on the experiences of minorities as well as those of the majority. 5. Help Europeans and European Americans understand the individual, national, and global benefits of high quality, multicultural, urban education. Educators must understand that quality education for all students contributes to individual freedom, national security, and global success.

References

Arnove, R. E. & Torres, C. A. (2003). Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Cornbleth, C. (2008). Diversity and the new teacher: Learning from experience in urban schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York, NY: New York University Press. Feagin, J. (2010). The white racial frame: Centuries of racial framing and counterframing. New York, NY: Routledge. Gillborn, D. (2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 485-505. Henderson, G. (2000). Race in America. In L.G. Baruth & M.L. Manning, Multicultural counseling and psychotherapy: A lifespan perspective (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (2006). Toward a critical race theory of education. In A. D. Dixson & C. K. Rousseau (Eds.), Critical race theory in education: All god’s children got a song (pp. 11-30). New York, NY: Routledge. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Leonardo, Z. (2009). Race, whiteness, and education. New York, NY: Routledge. Sleeter, C. E. (2001). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools: Research and the overwhelming presence of whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 94-106. Spring, J. (2009). Globalization of education: An introduction. New York, NY: Routledge. United States Department of Education. (2011). Public elementary/secondary school universe survey, 2007-2008. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ruraled/tables/b.1.b.-1.asp?refer=urban Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Author Information

Taharee Jackson (presenting / submitting)
University of the District of Columbia
National Center for Urban Education
Washington

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.