Session Information
11 SES 08 B, Educational Effectiveness in Different Contexts
Paper Session
Contribution
General description of research questions, objectives and theoretical framework
This is the second stage of a project aimed at designing methods and instruments to identify schools with poor academic results that need support, diagnose their problems and deficits, and create programs to improve them and enable them to operate more effectively.
The previous stage was a statistical analysis of academic results, staff, funding and curriculum of 2,000 schools in three regions of Russia that have been identified as underperforming, as well as an in-depth analysis of 20 schools. The results helped diagnose general problems in the administration, academic organization and teaching at these schools, as well as issues with the schools' culture.
This research included additional statistical analysis of 500 schools, students and their parents, and the main characteristics of the social context of schools that have been showing a steady decline in academic results.
In each region, we chose one or two schools with similar social characteristics, strong academic results and solid reputations among local experts.
A deeper diagnosis was carried out at a group of successful schools, which helped clarify the general policy and strategic decisions that lead to effective work under adverse conditions.
A model of an “effective school” was used to analyze schools' educational policy and strategies. This was based on a selection of the most common elements from models designed by P. Mortimor, R. Marzano, Highreliability school, successful practices to improve work at schools in the US as described by C. Corallo, D. McDonald, and programs from the Institute of Education at the University of London.
Based on the effective strategies implemented at a group of successful schools, a model program was developed to improve schools with persistently low academic results that operate in difficult social contexts. The complex programs were realized at schools, as well as at the administrative level for the region, locally and at the schools.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
1. Anthony S. Bryk. Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons From Chicago, 2009
2. C.Belfield. The Cost of Early School leaving and School Failure, 2008.
3. C.Corallo, D.McDonald Wat Works with Low-performing Schools, 2001 de AEL.
4. Alma Harris, Judith Gunraj, Sue James, Paul Clarke and Belinda Harris. Improving Schools in Exceptionally Challenging Circumstances Tales from the Frontline. Continuum Press, 2005.
5. Harris А.. Challenging the Challenged: Developing an Improvement Programme for Schools Facing Exceptionally Challenging Circumstances, Journal of School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2006.
6. Harris, A., & Chapman, C. Leadership in Schools Facing Challenging Circumstances. London: National College for School Leadership, 2002
7. Hopkins D. Meeting the Challenge. An Improvement Guide for Schools Facing Challenging Circumstances. London: Department for Education and Skills, 2001.
8. Mortimore, P. The road to improvement. Reflections on school effectiveness. Swets&Zeitliner Publishers. 1998.
9. Marzano R. J. What Works in Schools: Translating Research into Action. 2006.
10. McCutcheon A. Latent class analysis. London: Sage, 1987. P. 5-44; Dayton C.M., Macready G. Use of categorical and continuous covariates in latent class analysis // Applied latent class analysis / Ed. by J. Hagenaars and A. McCutcheon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002ю
11. M.Mourched, C.Chijoke, M.Barber How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. McKinsey&Company,2010.
12. Marina Pinskaya, Tatyana Timkova, Olga Obukhova. Can schools influence the elementary school students’ level of literacy in reading? Based on the analysis of PIRLS-2006 results. The education journal Voprosi Obrazovaniya, issue #2, 2009
13. School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide for Advancing Student Achievement in Georgia Schools Georgia Department of Education K. Cox, State Superintendent of Schools Revised December 19, 2008
14. Uebersax J. A brief study of local maximum solutions in latent class analysis
15. URL:
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.