Session Information
27 SES 10 C, Cooperative Teaching and Learning Forms
Paper Session
Contribution
Introduction into the Vertebrates in a Project-Based versus Teacher-Centered Setting
This paper asks how to promote pupils to reconstruct their knowledge about vertebrate concepts in a way that their conceptual understanding fits scientific evidence. It proposes a project-based approach of teaching Classification of Vertebrates. This approach is theory-orientated relying on project theory and on conceptual change theory. Therefore I compared the children’s learning and performance in a project-based unit on vertebrates with a teacher-directed unit. The goal of my investigation was to see the effects of the two teaching methods on children’s conceptual change and whether biology teachers might utilize project-based methods for the reaching of educational standards.
Theoretical framework
More recent research results prove that teacher-centered learning cannot contribute to a better educational quality in the sense of a more flexible easy-to-apply knowledge. Among others the difficulties met by pupils are to be considered as a consequence of teaching methods based on questions and answers developed thereof under the supervision of teachers (Sumfleth, 2002). The discussion about improving the quality of science education focuses on a variety of methods, so the project method (A. Wasmann-Frahm, 2009).
Many investigations have proved the lack of taxonomic knowledge (Braund, 1991; Ryman, 1974; Wasmann-Frahm, 2009a). The common suggestions that penguins, whales, sea-lions were fish reveal a classification attributed to the habitat and locomotion criteria. The problem is that such misconceptions are resistant to change (Duit, 2000). Instead of using the learnt conceptions people continue applying the concepts they first learnt (Olman, 2004; Posner, Strike, Hewson, & Gertzog, 1982; Quine, 1977; Rosch, Mervis, Gray, Johnson, & Boyes-Braem, 1976). For the construction of vertebrate concepts pupils have to learn using both parts of the hybrid comparison process, the similarity-based and the theory-based part (Smith & Sloman, 1994).
The project learning in question is characterized by the elaboration of a complex interlaced theme. The learning is action-oriented, takes place in co-operative settings and pursues a common goal, for example a presentation or an exposition about the students’ findings (Bastian, Gudjons, Schnack, & Speth, 2004; Dewey, 1931; Wasmann-Frahm, 2009). It is integrated in subject lessons and submitted to curricular guidance (A. Wasmann-Frahm, 2009).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Bastian, J., Gudjons, H., Schnack, J., & Speth, M. (Eds.). (2004). Theorie des Projektunterrichts (2 ed.). Hamburg: Bergmann und Helbig Braund, M. (1991). Children's ideas in classifying animals. Journal of Biological Education, 25(2), 103-110. Dewey, J. (1931). Der Ausweg aus dem pädagogischen Wirrwarr. In R. O. Horlacher, J. (Ed.), Pädagogische Aufsätze und Abhandlungen (1900-1944) (pp. 295). Zürich: Verlag Pestalozzianum. Dresden, A., & Lee, K. (2007). The Effects of Project Work in a First-Grade Classroom: A Little Goes a Long Way. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 9(1). Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v9n1/dresden.html Duit, R. (2000). Konzeptwechsel und Lernen in den Naturwissenschaften in einem mehrperspektivischen Ansatz. In R. Duit, von Rhöneck, C. (Ed.), Ergebnisse fachdidaktischer und psychologischer Lehr-Lern-Forschung (Vol. 169, pp. 77-103). Kiel: IPN. Krajcik, J. B., P.C.; Marx, R.W.; Bass, K.M.; Fredricks, J.; Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313-350. Olman, C., KErsten, D. (2004). Classification objects, ideal observers &generative models. Cognitive science, 28, 227 - 239. Posner, G. J. S., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227. Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. H. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21-59). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Ryman, D. (1974). Childrens´ understanding of the classification of living organisms. Journal of Biological Education, 8(3), 140-144. Smith, E. E., & Sloman, S. A. (1994). Similarity- versus rule-based categorization. Memory and Cognition, 22(4), 377-386. Wasmann-Frahm. (2009a). Conceptual change through changing the process of comparison. Journal of Biological Education, 43(2), 71-78. Wasmann-Frahm, A. (2009). Kompetenzentwicklung durch Projektunterricht. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 37(1), 77-96.
Update Modus of this Database
The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.