Thwarted Cosmopolitanism: Mixed Heritage Youth in a London School
Author(s):
Indra Dewan (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

05 SES 02 A, Students’ Voices and Researching with Youth at Risk

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-13
15:15-16:45
Room:
JK 28/112,G, 58
Chair:
Mark Hadfield

Contribution

 

This paper presents data from research with young mixed heritage people attending a multi-ethnic gender-mixed comprehensive in London to show how the intersections between class, gender and racial/cultural mix impact on their everyday and educational lives in different ways (McCall 2005). It draws on the discourses of cosmopolitanism and individualism (Rose 1998; Beck and Beck-Gernsheim 2001; Beck 2006; Furlong and Cartmel 2008) within the contexts of race, personhood and education to frame a discussion of the data. In Britain, the cosmopolitan discourse underpins the idea that mixed heritage identity presages an enlightened race-free world in which people of all colours and cultures are fully recognised and affirmatively embraced. The students in this study reflected this perspective, and unequivocally believed that mixedness encouraged intercultural understanding and represented a progressive society. There were, however, marked differences along the lines of class in terms of how the discourses of cosmopolitanism and individualism actually played out in students’ lives. Middle class students, especially girls, regarded mixedness as a desirable identity and tended to fit comfortably into the middle class school habitus – they did well at school, saw themselves as equal to all others and believed that their racial heritage had no bearing on the opportunities available to them. In contrast, students from working class backgrounds, especially boys, expressed what I would call a ‘thwarted cosmopolitanism’ in that they embraced its values whilst often struggling with the negative effects of race, class and gender in the form of misconceptions, stereotyping, racial profiling and discrimination. The findings destabilise neo-liberal assumptions evident in education policy and public discourse which suggest that we are moving towards a more cosmopolitan, meritocratic and egalitarian society in which race, class and gender are no longer politically or socially significant issues. These students' articulations about what it is like to be mixed race in a London today often makes for uncomfortable reading. Their views and experiences clearly contradict the popular belief that individuals are the makers of their own destinies, and call for an end to the abiding social structures which continue to shape many mixed heritage people's lives in unjust ways.

 

Method

I have drawn on critical race feminist philosophy and pedagogy (Mohanty 2003) to undertake participatory research with young mixed heritage people aged 14-16 attending a multi-ethnic comprehensive in a multicultural area of London. The study, which is work in progress, aims to give them a 'voice' (Hadfield and Haw, 2000) and the opportunity to speak in semi-structured and in-depth interviews and conversations about their everyday and educational experiences. Photography and video have also been used to document elements of students' lives. Discourse analysis has been drawn upon to analyse the data which is in its early stages. I am currently interpreting, writing up and disseminating the data at conferences in conjunction with several participants.

Expected Outcomes

The paper draws attention to the persistent salience of race and class in many mixed race teenagers' lives, and discusses possible social and educational interventions (policy and practice) which focus on the needs of mixed race people. I conclude that the teacher researcher has political, social and pedagogic responsibility to the students s/he works with and suggest ways in which a critical and proactive approach to addressing issues around race inequality and discrimination can be negotiated within a whole school context. The wider theoretical aim of the study is to contribute to critical mixed race studies and the growing body of work that critiques the overarching discourse of individualisation.

References

Beck, Ulrich. 2006. The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity Press. Beck, Ulrich and Elizabeth Beck-Gernsheim. 2001. Individualisation: Institutionalised individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage. DfES. 2004. Understanding the educational needs of mixed heritage pupils. RR549. Furlong, Andy and Fred Cartmel. 2008. Young people and social change: New perspectives. Berkshire: Open University Press. Hadfield, M. and Haw, K. 2000. The 'voice' of young people: Hearing, listening, responding. Nottingham: School of Education, University of Nottingham. McCall, Leslie. 2005. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30, no. 3: 1771-1800. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. London: Duke University Press. Rose, Nikolas. 1998. Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Skeggs, Beverley. 2004. Class, self, culture. London and New York: Routledge.

Author Information

Indra Dewan (presenting / submitting)
Freelance
London

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.