Identities in a Higher Education System: Action and Interaction towards Quality Education

Session Information

ERG SES B 02, Parallel Session B 02

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-12
11:00-12:30
Room:
J 27/14,G, 69
Chair:
Des Hewitt

Contribution

Identidad, Satisfacción, Política y Calidad Académica en Profesores Universitarios

Considering Higher Education not only part of the social structure, but a unique system of agents and groups who take action and establish relations with each other on a specific institutional framework, an interest in the study of the special dynamic of a institution arises, mostly because that dynamic might be an important factor while trying to achieve the goal of assuring quality education.

Based on that, a research project is proposed, trying to answer: What aspects of the identity of the diverse groups in a higher education institution are related to quality of education in the case of The University of Sonora (Mexico)?

 A first step and objective, is to address, the different formal and unformal groups (researchers-teachers, students, employees and workers, administrative and decision making employees), to identify who and where those groups are, to explore their identities and relations, so we can count with a look at most of the groups, their interactions and identities, especially of those who shape actions that can result in quality education.

Identity is to be understood in a social and professional way following the model developed by Bolivar, Fernandez and Molina (2005), while action, relations and quality education will be studied and defined in the institutional context like academic programs, guilds, student unions, offices and decision making formal groups, laws and codes, university policies, quality indicator used by the institution and Mexico´s Ministry of Education etc.

The value of this kind of research is the possibility of counting with knowledge about how university structures, policies and quality education practices shape the actions, interactions and general identities of their members, being able to see which aspects make identity quality driven. Comparisons could be done between universities that have similar structures and quality goals and practices.

Method

The methodological design corresponds with the qualitative approach of Grounded Theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967) for sampling and data analysis. Based on theoretical sampling we arrived at a sample of 18 researches-teachers, 30 students (undergraduate and graduate), 18 employees and workers, and 18 administrative authorities and decision making personnel, sample to be modified until reaching saturation of data. The sample and participants selection responds to several criteria, like representing the academic and administrative division of the university, having full time contracts, having some years on that work position or not being first semester students, working in key offices or position in the university. A semi-structured interview is adapted to each group and used for data collection, general themes are identity (following the model of Bolivar, Fernandez and Molina, 2005), relation to other groups and quality education and policies. Interviews are to be recorded and reproduced in to an electronic text format, to be handled, processed and codified using Atlas Ti (v5.5).

Expected Outcomes

In this phase, all 18 researchers-teachers interviews were completed and analyzed. Teachers have a strong professional and personal identity very related to teaching, doing research has come an inseparable part of a teachers work as result of some programs that look for research, to recognize their performance and quality. Teachers have very good relations with their students, while with other teachers and authorities, problems and differences might appear because they don’t share the same philosophy on education and university management (or in the teachers guild), some teachers said that they are stuck because authorities don’t let them grow professionally and academically, and not letting them participate on the decision making processes because of political differences. All of them expressed concerns about quality indicators and programs the university and Mexico´s Ministry of Education use, mostly because they feel that’s it’s easy to cheat in the evaluations, and to do things just to get recognition on quality but not reflecting anything in real practice. Some of them think new policies have changed teachers work neglecting real academic actions and quality practices; others said policies don’t matter because they have full control on their classrooms and there they can do whatever they want.

References

Dubar, C. (2000). La socialisation. Construction des identités sociales et professionnelles. (3ra ed) Paris: Armand Colin. Bolívar, A. Fernández Cruz, M. & Molina, E. (2005). Investigar la identidad profesional del profesorado: Una triangulación secuencial. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research, [Revista electrónica] 6 (1) Disponible en: ttp://www.qualitative-research.net/ Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of Grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing. Universidad de Sonora. (2009). Plan de Desarrollo Institucional 2009-2013. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.

Author Information

UNIVERSIDAD DE SONORA
HERMOSILLO
Gustavo Cortez (presenting / submitting)
UNIVERSIDAD DE SONORA, Mexico
UNIVERSIDAD DE SONORA, Mexico
UNIVERSIDAD DE SONORA, Mexico

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.