09 SES 06 C, Relating National to International Large-scale Assessments
Parallel Paper Session
In Germany the university entrance qualification is acquired by successfully passing the academic high school exit examination (Abitur). An important function of centrally organized high school exit examinations is to guarantee the comparability of graduations. This so called ‘comparability function’ of school certifications (Kühn, 2010) especially gained importance in Germany, since the PISA-Studies revealed that the comparability of graduations is not necessarily given in the German school system. (Blossfeld et al., 2011; Marzano & Heflebower, 2011). Therefore, the federal states of Germany - except for one - shifted from a decentral to a central organization of the examination system. This examination is centrally organized in 15 out of the 16 federal states of Germany. Only in one federal state the examination tasks are still compiled by the teachers.
Nevertheless, the assessment of these central examinations is still done by the course teachers, based on previously centrally defined criteria and sample solutions with a given scale of maximum points to be achieved. The examination procedure can thus be characterized as a half-standardized achievement test.
Previous studies have shown that teachers use diverse criteria and evaluation scales for assigning grades to written tests (Ingenkamp 1997; Schrader & Helmke 2001). The study presented in this paper therefore focuses on the inspection of the validity of the half-standardized achievement test procedure. For this purpose the examination tasks and the results of the central high school exit examinations in mathematics for the federal state of North-Rhine-Westphalia are compared to those of the standardized pre-university TIMSS-test (Baumert et al., 2000; Mullis et al., 1998). The pre-university TIMSS-test has been chosen to grasp the quality of the central high school exit examinations by comparing its results with the results of the written A-level examination in mathematics. The TIMSS-test is supposed to serve this function as it holds a very high curricular validity which has been once more reaffirmed in the context of the presented study itself.
Baumert, J., Bos, W., & Watermann, R. (2000). Fachleistungen im voruniversitären Mathematik- und Physikunterricht im internationalen Vergleich. In J. Baumert (Ed.). TIMSS/III. Dritte internationale Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie – mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung am Ende der Schullaufbahn, (pp. 129–180). Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Blossfeld, H.-P.,Bos, W.,Daniel, H.-P.,Hannover, B.,Lenzen, D., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Gemeinsames Kernabitur. Zur Sicherung von nationalen Bildungsstandards und fairem Hochschulzugang. Münster: Waxmann. Bond, T. G., & Fox C. M. (2010): Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Ingenkamp, K. (Hg.) (1997): Die Fragwürdigkeit der Zensurengebung. 9. Aufl. Weinheim: Beltz. Kühn, S. M. (2010). Steuerung und Innovation durch Abschlussprüfungen? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Marzano, R. J., & Heflebower, T. (2011). Grades that show what students know. Educational Leadership 69 (3), 34–39. Mullis, I.V., Martin, M.O., Beaton, A.E. et. al. (1998).Mathematics and science achievement in the final year of secondary school. IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS).Chestnut Hill and Boston College. Schrader, F.-W., & Helmke, A. (2001). Alltägliche Leistungsbeurteilung durch Lehrer. In F. E. Weinert (Hg.): Leistungsmessungen in Schulen. Weinheim: Beltz, S. 45–58.
Some networks have already started to plan their chairperson(s).
But at the moment chairpersons are only pencilled in, as we will still need to check for time conflicts between presentation and chairing duties. EERA office will work on this in due course and then officially let chairpersons know about their chairing duties.
Meanwhile, thank you for your patience.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.