Self esteem: A forgotten aspect of leadership
Author(s):
Adam Nir (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

01 SES 06 A, Influences of Leadership on CPD

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-19
15:30-17:00
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.5
Chair:
Heinz Guenter Holtappels

Contribution

Theoretical background

While organizational leaders are often considered individuals characterized by self confidence and high self esteem, studies indicate that this assumption may hold true only for some leaders. For others, however, entering leadership positions may be viewed as means to enhance their self esteem through the support and appreciation they expect to receive on the job (Popper 2000, 2002; Post, 1993). The literature offers a significant amount of data testifying to the significance of self esteem for leaders' professional conduct.  It was found that self esteem has a positive correlation with effective leadership performance (Hill & Ritchie, 1977) and is a good predictor for leadership behavior in general (Atwater et al., 1999; Younger, 2002) and of successful leaders in particular (Paunonen et al., 2006). Moreover, it was found that a positive sense of self esteem among leaders is correlated with their willingness to trust others, with their ability to work without the need to obtain the recognition of others (Bass, 1990), with courage (Wein, 2007), with entrepreneurial conduct (Baumeister et al., 2003), and with a positive sense of self efficacy (Luszcynska, Gutierrez & Schwarzer, 2005). Therefore, it is hardly surprising that the debate regarding the implications of unbalanced self esteem and its influences on leaders' professional conduct captures much attention in the current leadership literature (Pittinsky & Rosenthal, 2006). Yet, in considering the high stress that leaders experience on the job, maintaining and strengthening the sense of self esteem is not an easy task. Based on Kohut’s psychology of the self (1971, 1977), which considers the sense of self esteem an independent dynamic and evolving dimension of personality requiring nourishment and maintenance through life, the following study explores the ways whereby leaders preserve and promote their sense of self esteem while faced with stressful circumstances. 

Method

Interviews were chosen as the major data collection method to enable large amounts of data about interviewees’ perspectives to be collected relatively quickly and the immediate follow-up of equivocal issues (Taylor & Bogdan, 1984). The use of an open-interview strategy enabled better exposure of personal perspectives of the interviewees (Paton, 1990) and their deeper thoughts, emotions and ambitions (Bromley, 1986). This less structured approach allowed the interviews to be much more like conversations than formal events with predetermined response categories, enabling the respondents’ views to unfold rather than the predisposition of the researcher (Marshall & Rossman, 1997, p. 80). All interviews were recorded with the interviewees’ permission to ensure better accuracy. Later on, the recorded interviews were transcribed onto computerized text files, which eventually formed the data set. Using the perspective of Marshall and Rossman (1997) and the procedures outlined by Marton (1988) and Forster (1994), comments were brought together on the basis of their similarities into categories that differed from one another in terms of the subject matter and meaning which each category represented. To enhance the validity of the data categorization and of the interpretations, peer review and structured analysis (Reissman, 1993; Strauss & Corbin, 1990) were employed.

Expected Outcomes

All respondents reported that they experience a lot of stress undermining their self actualization, internal strength and coherence which, according to Kohut (1971, 1977), are the building blocks of self esteem. Self esteem is gain through two main sources: external, referring to the on the job circumstances, and internal, referring to self perceptions. External sources include positive feedback, positive organizational outcomes and the professional support of counselors. Internal sources include professionalism, earned know-how, and continuous learning. The study testifies that all leaders need some reassurance and constant nourishment to their self esteem and that professional development is viewed among the most important measure in serving this end. The findings point to the need to create sufficient professional opportunities for professional growth which seem to promote leaders’ self esteem. Based on these findings, it is suggested that the theoretical perspectives typically employed to distinguish between internal and external factors influencing individuals’ self esteem and therefore, their professional conduct, are slightly misleading and that these perspectives should not be treated as divergent but rather, complementary.

References

Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research and Management Applications. New York: Free Press. Bromley, D. J. (1986). The case study method in psychology and related disciplines. New York: Wiley. Hill, N. C., & Ritchie, J. B. (1977). The effect of self esteem on leadership and achievement. A paradigm of managerial effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 50-64. Kohut, H. (1977). The Restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1997). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage. Paton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, California: Sage. Popper, M. (2000). The Development of Charismatic Leaders. Political Psychology, 21(4), 729-744. Post, J. M. (1993). Current concepts of the narcissistic personality: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology, 14, 22-121. Reissman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, California: Sage. Rosenthal, G. & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17 (6), 617-633. Taylor, S. J., and Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meaning. New York: Wiley.

Author Information

Adam Nir (presenting / submitting)
The Hebrew University
The School of Education
Jerusalem

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.