Session Information
01 SES 06 A, Influences of Leadership on CPD
Parallel Paper Session
Contribution
Theoretical background
While organizational leaders are often considered individuals characterized by self confidence and high self esteem, studies indicate that this assumption may hold true only for some leaders. For others, however, entering leadership positions may be viewed as means to enhance their self esteem through the support and appreciation they expect to receive on the job (Popper 2000, 2002; Post, 1993). The literature offers a significant amount of data testifying to the significance of self esteem for leaders' professional conduct. It was found that self esteem has a positive correlation with effective leadership performance (Hill & Ritchie, 1977) and is a good predictor for leadership behavior in general (Atwater et al., 1999; Younger, 2002) and of successful leaders in particular (Paunonen et al., 2006). Moreover, it was found that a positive sense of self esteem among leaders is correlated with their willingness to trust others, with their ability to work without the need to obtain the recognition of others (Bass, 1990), with courage (Wein, 2007), with entrepreneurial conduct (Baumeister et al., 2003), and with a positive sense of self efficacy (Luszcynska, Gutierrez & Schwarzer, 2005). Therefore, it is hardly surprising that the debate regarding the implications of unbalanced self esteem and its influences on leaders' professional conduct captures much attention in the current leadership literature (Pittinsky & Rosenthal, 2006). Yet, in considering the high stress that leaders experience on the job, maintaining and strengthening the sense of self esteem is not an easy task. Based on Kohut’s psychology of the self (1971, 1977), which considers the sense of self esteem an independent dynamic and evolving dimension of personality requiring nourishment and maintenance through life, the following study explores the ways whereby leaders preserve and promote their sense of self esteem while faced with stressful circumstances.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research and Management Applications. New York: Free Press. Bromley, D. J. (1986). The case study method in psychology and related disciplines. New York: Wiley. Hill, N. C., & Ritchie, J. B. (1977). The effect of self esteem on leadership and achievement. A paradigm of managerial effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 50-64. Kohut, H. (1977). The Restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1997). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage. Paton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, California: Sage. Popper, M. (2000). The Development of Charismatic Leaders. Political Psychology, 21(4), 729-744. Post, J. M. (1993). Current concepts of the narcissistic personality: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology, 14, 22-121. Reissman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, California: Sage. Rosenthal, G. & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17 (6), 617-633. Taylor, S. J., and Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meaning. New York: Wiley.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.