10 SES 02 B, Parallel Paper Session
Parallel Paper Session
Cooperative learning has been described as a worldwide phenomenon which is being increasingly used across Europe. It can be defined as ‘the instructional use of small groups so that students work together to maximise their own and each other’s learning’ (Johnson et al., 1990: 4) and can be used across all subject areas and stages of schooling. ‘…One of the ‘best practices’ in education’, as Sapon-Shevin (2004: 3) comes to describe it.
However, implementing cooperative learning successfully –fostering open communication between teachers and students, promoting investigation, problem-solving and reasoning - takes skill and understanding of the theory that supports practice. Teacher competence in delivering it well, thus, has been identified as an essential feature in its systematic implementation (Webb, 1988; Oortwijn et al., 2007).
The first problem one encounters when implementing cooperative learning successfully stems from ITE itself. Schelfhout et al. (2006) stress the fact that teacher education institutions tend to tutor in a teaching-focused way and that the theoretical knowledge absorbed during ITE may not include a practical use, believing that student teachers will put theory into practice from what they learn in lectures and from what they see on placement. It is a model based on transmission rather than on transaction or transformation (Sharan, 2010: 306). Moreover, there are perceptions that some teacher education institutions ‘are not always inclined to teach the latest innovative thoughts about learning and instruction’ (Schelfhout et al., 2006: 877).
A second hurdle in teacher education derives from pre-existing conceptions of student teachers about learning and teaching in general and cooperative learning in particular, which may interfere with the new ideas they are presented with. This may be a consequence of the situation mentioned above, as their classes in schools and at university were generally more teacher-focused (Schelfhout et al., 2006: 879).
A third area of concern is that, since cooperative learning presents a significant shift in practice for some teachers, even experienced teachers need follow up support. As Foote et al (2004) and Helbert (2009) point out: on the one hand, student teachers can be assigned to a school placement that provides no support or guidance on how to implement cooperative learning. On the other hand, student teachers trained in cooperative learning tend to use a variety of techniques immediately after training but, as the school year progresses, this number decreases to one or two, possibly due to this lack of support.
This research, carried out in Scotland, aims to highlight the ingredients of a successful ITE course on cooperative learning. Our hypothesis is that if it is desired that student teachers use cooperative learning techniques in their school settings regularly, it is essential to take these three factors into consideration: 1) use a learning-based approach rather than a teaching-based approach on ITE; 2) change student teachers previous conceptions gradually and 3) provide them with support.
Cohen, L., L. Manion and K. Morrison. 2004. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge Falmer. DelliCarpini, M. 2009. Enhanced cooperative learning in TESOL teacher education. ELT Journal, 63/1: 42-50. Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12/2:219-245. Foote, C.J., P.J. Vermette, J. Wilson-Bridgman, T.J. Sheeran, R. Erwin and M. Murray. 2004. Preparing Secondary Teachers to Use Cooperative Learning Strategies. In Teaching Cooperative Learning – The Challenge for Teacher Education. eds Cohen, E.G., Brody, C.M.and Sapon-Shevin, M. Albany: State University of New York. Helbert, J. 2009. Scottish Continuing International Professional Development (SCIPD) Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson and E.H. Holubec. 1990. Circles of Learning – cooperation in the classroom. Minnesota: Interaction Book Company. Lincoln, Y.S. and E.G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. California: Sage. Lyman, F. and N. Davidson. 2004. Cooperative Learning in Preservice Teacher Education at the University of Maryland. In Cooperative Learning – The Challenge for Teacher Education . eds Cohen, E.G., C.M. Brody and M. Sapon-Shevin. Albany: State University of New York. Oortwijn, M.B., M. Boekaerts, P. Vedder and J.W. Strijbos. 2007 Helping Behaviours during cooperative learning and learning gains: The role of the teacher and of pupils’ prior knowledge and ethnic background. Learning and Instruction 18: 146-159. Sapon-Shevin, M. 2004. Introduction in E.G. Cohen, C.M. Brody & M. Sapon-Shevin (Eds) (2004) Teaching Cooperative Learning – The Challenge for Teacher Education Albany: State University of New York. Sharan, Y. 2010. Cooperative Learning for Academic and Social Gains: valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education, 45/2: 300-313. Schelfhout et al, 2006. Educating for learning-focused teaching in teacher training: the need to link learning conent with practice experiences within an inductive approach. Teaching and Teacher Education 22: 874-897 Webb, N.M. 1988. Peer Interaction and Learning with Computers in Small Groups. Computers in Human Behaviour, 3: 193-209.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.