The core of language “The assessment between children’s capacity to pronounce isolated phonemes and, children’s capacity to say words aloud”
Author(s):
Patricia Tyrer (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

09 SES 12 B, Assessments in Elementary and Primary Education

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-21
09:00-10:30
Room:
FCT - Aula 15
Chair:
Sarah Frahm

Contribution

The final common pathway in all oral communication for Education and Development for All involves acquisition of phonemic knowledge and the ability to articulate whole words; phonemes are the core of language. It is crucial for children to have the capacity to pronounce isolated phonemes and to have the capacity to read or say words aloud. Reading is the opening door to the world of learning.

        This paper focuses on the relationship between children’s capacity to pronounce isolated phonemes and, children’s capacity to say words aloud. The research question framing the study was: What concept is so basic to speech, spelling, and reading that its presence or absence becomes critical in the processing of these skills? The assessment of children’s Phonemic knowledge and their ability to articulate whole words in the English language: is this an implication for learning to read? Is reading aloud from a standard printed text the best chance of eliciting the best sample of English Phonemes? To find a reliable testing tool to assess children’s ability in these areas.

        Auditory conceptualisation was found to be a critical factor, as all the children from this study were sent for hearing and auditory processing testing and were found to have this “problem with auditory conceptualisation”.

As Leorner and Kline, (2006) reported there are children with learning disabilities at the secondary level who lack the requisite skills needed to meet academic expectations, such as reading, spelling, and mathematics “the key to learning to read is becoming what is known in the field as being Phonologically aware” (Tallai, 2011).  This reinforces this research study, as phonological awareness was found to be a key factor to learning to read.

The importance of teachers being skilled in the teaching of reading, including understanding the child and the reading process is vitally important.  Harwell and Jackson, (2008) found that phonologically based reading disabilities are characterised by difficulties acquiring phonetic reading strategies.

This research is concerned, with the core of language, which is about children’s development of phonemic knowledge and articulation of whole words and the problem of auditory conceptualisation dysfunction.  Why “Words”? Words are concrete signs with encoded meaning, with contained semantic value. They have been socially codified by mutually accepted meanings and by rules of grammar. We are conditioned by words and the word formula of our language; the words we inherit teach us many things. Words have sounds, as the core of language: with out them we cannot speak.

 Phonological knowledge and phonemic awareness are among the most powerful predictors of subsequent reading ability. The core of language (phonemes) is a very important part of human cognition, which distinguishes us from other animals. Language is a tool simple enough for a child grasp effortlessly, yet so complex that we may never completely understand just how genetics and experience interact to produce this most integral human trait. The ability to comprehend and use language is one of the most reliable indicators of the grade of mental development. 

Method

The IPA and the St. Lucia Graded Word Test were applied to investigate the way phonological skills impact on reading ability. The research for my thesis focused on a sample of 898 children (Preschool through to Year 8) from schools in the metropolitan area of Brisbane (Queensland, Australia). Data was collected on children’s capacity to pronounce phonemes and read and say words aloud. A new sample of 84 children, were participating in a language program at my clinic, were selected for the case study. The testing tools used in the main sample, which were statistically shown to be reliable, were used again with this sample of children; these tools proved to be useful for teachers in the classroom. The children were tested both before and after the therapy program. This allowed some investigation of whether their ability to pronounce phonemes improved as their progress in reading improved. The case study sample could be matched with the variables of age, gender, grade school and language level proficiency. The children and the specific nature of the sample were recognized as requiring help with language and reading.

Expected Outcomes

This study highlights the need to recognise that the phonemic knowledge and skills underpinning learning to read apply to children in the middle years as well as early childhood. The assessment and subsequent intervention programs were done with individuals who had speech, spelling, or reading problems. It was found that age, gender, language background, and socio-economical factors did not appear to relate directly to these problems. Such problems could not be traced to a specific teaching approach. Six month later the children were assessed with the same testing tools to compare their improvement. The results showed that all children had improved with these special programs. All the children were diagnosed with developmental dyslexia. Krafnick, Flowers, Napoliello and Eden, (2010) found in their latest studies that intensive training in a variety of cognitive and sensorimotor skills can result in changes in gray matter volume. The study of the above authors gave insight to how the 84 children of the research study presented improved with intensive learning programs. The 21st Century classroom teachers need the diagnostic tools of assessment to identify auditory dysfunction and also the pedagogical skills to effectively respond. Effective skills gives children the opportunity to do well in English and consequently in other areas of the curriculum and the freedom of further education.

References

Coltheart M. (2005). Sematic impairment with and without surface dyslexia: Implications for Reading, Models of reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology Vol. 22 Issue 6, September 2005 p.695-717 Diaz McLachlan, (2007). Literacy’s in Childhood. Second Edition Australia, Elsevier Australia. Hesketh, A., Adams, C. & Nightingale, C. 2000. Metaphonological abilities of phonologically disordered children. Educational Psychology 20, 483-498. Hogan, Cotts, Little (2005). The Relationship Between Phonological Awareness and Reading Implications for the assessment of Phonological Awareness. American speech - language Hearing Association. Krafnick, Flowers, Napoliello, Eden, (2010). Gray Matter volume changes following reading intervention in dyslexic. Children Center for study of Learning, Georgetown, University Medical Center Leorner & Kline, (2006). Learning Disabilities and Related Disorders. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company. Nancollis, Loevrie, Dodd, (2005). Phonological Awareness Intervention And the Acquisition of literacy skills in children from deprived social backgrounds, Language, Speech and hearing services in schools. American speech - language - hearing Association. Ralph, E. G., Walker, K., & Wimmer, R. (2008). The clinical/practicum experience in professional preparation: Preliminary findings. McGill Journal of Education, 43(2), 157-172. Senechal M. (2009). Literacy, language and emotional development. Rev. Ed. In: Tremblay R.E., Barr R.G., Peters R. Dev., and Bowen M. Ed. Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development Montreal, Quebec. Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development. Tallai P. (2011). Neuroscience, Phonology and Reading: The Oral Written Language Continuum. Center for Molecule and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University Tyrer, J.H. (2001). Language in Lock, S., Last, J.M., Dunea, G. (eds) The Oxford Illustrated Companion to Medicine. Third Edition. United States, Oxford University Press. Woliver & Ibrahim, (2006). Auditory Processing Disorder: The Hidden Disability. USA, Long Island Press Woolfolk A & Margetts K, (2007). Educational Psychology. Pearson Education, Australia

Author Information

Patricia Tyrer (presenting / submitting)
University of Southern Queensland
Education
Brisbane

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.