Student Teachers’ Motivations and Commitment to Teaching at the Outset of Teacher Education: A Typological Approach.
Author(s):
Isabel Rots (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 03 A, Parallel Paper Session

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-18
17:15-18:45
Room:
ESI 1 - Aula 34
Chair:
Rose Dolan

Contribution

In a climate of recurring teacher shortages in many (European) countries, attracting talented and motivated people into the teaching profession is an international concern that occupies policy makers and researchers from a diverse range of countries (OECD, 2005). Particularly, there is a need to better understand individuals’ motivations for choosing teaching as a career, how these motivations are formed, how they influence career decision-making, and how they are challenged in particular school environments (Richardson & Watt, 2010). Although a growing body of research examines teachers’ motivations, beliefs, and early career development (see Brookhart & Freeman, 1992; OECD, 2005), research has tended to be empirically rather than theoretically driven, maybe due to the paucity of compelling conceptual frameworks (Retelsdorf & Günther, 2011; Richardson & Watt, 2010). Moreover, while many studies have investigated the factors that initially motivate people to become teachers, much less is known about changes to those motivations over time.


This paper proposal is a part of a larger research project that investigates the development in student teachers’ motivation for teaching and commitment to teaching during the course of their teacher education programme for upper secondary school, resulting in a particular decision on job entry upon graduation. The “Factors Influencing Teaching Choice” framework (FIT-choice, Watt & Richardson, 2007), which comprises 12 motivation factors, is grounded in the expectancy-value theory (Eccles, 2005) and offers a theoretically grounded and psychometrically strong approach to examine teaching motivations and their correlates over time.


The present study is among the first to apply a typological approach. This is an important contribution to previous research based on the FIT-choice framework. Given the diversity among entrants to teacher education for secondary school and in career decisions following graduation (Rots, Aelterman, Devos & Vlerick, 2010), we assume that student teachers have different levels of professional engagement, already at the outset of their teacher education. Building on Watt & Richardson (2008), we expect to identify a typology of student teachers based on their planned effort in teacher education and their planned entry into teaching upon graduation. Developments in motivation and commitment are compared for different types of student teachers.
As the first phase of a larger research project, the current proposal tackles the following research questions:

  1. Are there identifiable types of student teachers having distinct profiles of professional engagement at the outset of teacher education?
  2. Do distinct types of student teachers show different motivations for teaching and different levels of commitment to teaching at the outset of teacher education?

Method

The research context is the teacher education programme for teachers in upper secondary school in Flanders (Belgium). A total of 728 student teachers enrolled in ‘specific teacher education’ in two institutes (a university and a university college) completed a questionnaire at the beginning of the first semester of teacher education (response rate of 81.71%). Next to personal and contextual variables (e.g., gender, age, subject specialization), the questionnaire assesses (cf. the research questions): (1) Professional engagement: ‘planned effort in teacher education’ (Watt & Richardson, 2008) and ‘planned entry into teaching upon graduation’ (adapted from Watt & Richardson, 2008). (2) Motivation for teaching: 12 motivation factors of the FIT-choice scale (Watt & Richardson, 2007). (3) Commitment to teaching (van Huizen, 2000). Confirmatory factor analyses are conducted to establish the factor structure of the instruments. Cluster analysis is performed to classify types of student teachers based on their scores for the professional engagement variables (i.e., ‘planned effort in teacher education’ and ‘planned entry into teaching upon graduation’). Following Gore (2000), a two-step procedure is used. ANOVA and MANOVA test for differences among the distinct types of student teachers (i.e., clusters) with respect to their commitment to teaching and their motivations for teaching.

Expected Outcomes

Grounded in a comprehensive and integrative framework (FIT-Choice theory) and as part of a larger research project, this paper is a response to the lack of theory-based research on (the development in) student teachers’ motivations for teaching. The innovative element in our study especially builds on the typological approach. This is fairly new for this research field and has been identified as a necessary research challenge (Richardson & Watt, 2010; Thomson, Turner, & Nietfeld, 2011). The present study is the first one studying student teachers’ motivation for teaching from the perspective of their professional engagement at the outset of teacher education. The data are already collected (see above) and will be analyzed in spring 2012. Building on Watt & Richardson (2008), we expect to identify a typology of student teachers based on their professional engagement at the beginning of teacher education. At ECER 2012, we will discuss the empirically identifiable types among student teachers at the outset of their teacher education, based on their professional engagement (i.e., ‘planned effort in teacher education’ and ‘planned entry into teaching upon graduation’). Moreover, we will discuss whether these different types of student teachers show varying motivations for teaching and commitment to teaching.

References

Brookhart, S. M., & Freeman, D. J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62, 37-60. Gore, P.A (2000). Cluster analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley and S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 297-321). Academic Press, San Diego, CA. OECD (2005). Teachers Matter: Attracting, developing and retraining effective teachers. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retelsdorf, J., & Günther, C. (2011). Achievement goals for teaching and teachers’ reference norms: Relations with instructional practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1111- 1119. Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Current and future directions in teacher motivation research. In T. C. Urdan, & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), The decade ahead: Applications and contexts of motivation and achievement; Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Volume 16B (pp. 139-173). Bingley, U.K.: Emerald. Rots, I., Aelterman, A., Devos, G., & Vlerick, P. (2010). Teacher education and the choice to enter the teaching profession: A prospective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1619-1629. Thomson, M. M., Turner, J. E., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2011). A typological approach to investigate the teaching career decision: Motivations and beliefs about teaching of prospective teacher candidates. Teaching and Teacher Education. Advance on-line publication. Retrieved January 23, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.007 van Huizen, P. (2000). Becoming a teacher: Developing of a professional identity by prospective teachers in the context of university-based teacher education. Utrecht: Utrecht University. Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P.W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-choice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 167-202. Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18, 408-428.

Author Information

Isabel Rots (presenting / submitting)
Ghent University
Department of Educational Studies
Gent

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.