Developing teacher students´ TPACK-in-action: Google Maps as a thinking tool in geography instruction
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

16 SES 04 A, Pre-Service Teachers and ICT

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-19
09:00-10:30
Room:
FCT - Aula 12
Chair:
Chris Comber

Contribution

The aim of this study is to develop ways to support teacher students´ skills and knowledge for the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in the teaching of geography. Nowadays, teachers need diverse knowledge and skills for teaching with ICT and these have been described by Koehler and Mishra (2005) in the TPACK model. According to Koehler and Mishra (2005, 2009) the main components in the TPACK model are content knowledge (CK), pedagogical knowledge (PK) and technological knowledge (TK). TPACK can be seen as a mixture of these components, offering the knowledge needed for supporting students’ learning of specific content and using ICT in a pedagogically meaningful way (Koehler & Mishra 2005). It is also important to notice that the teachers´ TPACK is influenced by contextual factors, such culture, socioeconomic status and the school organization. (Harris, Mishra, & Koehler, 2009). 


Many studies have revealed deficiencies in teachers’ knowledge and abilities concerning the use of ICT for teaching (e.g. Shuldman 2004; Swan & Hofer 2011), therefore research has focused on the development of teachers´ TPACK and the factors that could promote its development (e.g. Harris & Hofer 2011; Jang 2010). This study also aims to support teacher students’ TPACK by constructing teaching intervention for geography instruction.


The context of this study was intervention on a geography course in which teacher students studied spatial perception and it´s construction in geography instruction. The intervention was based on sociocultural views about learning. According to the sociocultural theory, learning can be seen as an appropriation and externalization of cultural tools. (e.g. Engeström 2009; Vygotsky 1978; Wells 1999; Wertsch 1985; 1991). Cultural tools are improved from one generation to the next and new tools are developed for helping to make sense of things both individually and socially. For example, social software with its different applications (e.g. blogs and maps) are new innovations which can be used as thinking tools, as part of the learning process. In this intervention we built a learning environment in which the students used Google Maps as a thinking tool for sharing their ideas and interpretations for co-constructing knowledge.


The use of cultural tools is learned in both social and individual learning processes which are inherently connected to each other. In the social learning processes we get to know the cultural tools and appropriate their use. Learning occurs on two dimensions: between people and within individuals (e.g. Engeström 2009; Vygotsky 1978; Wells 1999; Wertsch 1985; 1991). Based on this theory of learning, we organized the learning environment in order to offer the students opportunities to use Google maps together with their peers in their co-construction processes. 


The main research questions are: 1) How did intervention affect the students´ TPACK? 2) How did the students experience the use of Google maps? 3) How did the students describe their learning processes?

Method

The intervention of this study was conducted in the University of Eastern Finland during spring 2011, the target group consisted of 112 teacher students. In the first phase of intervention, the students built a sheared thematic map using Google Maps. The students added place marks and wrote descriptions about them in order to make students´ spatial perceptions visible for the whole group. In the second phase they made observations, interpretations and conclusions about the map and co-constructed common understanding about factors that affect humans´ spatial perceptions. For the research strategy, we applied the qualitative case study. The study is based on phenomenological philosophy of science asserting that knowledge is constructed through the experiences of individuals. From the methodological point of view, phenomenology means that the focus of the investigation is on the students´ learning experiences. After intervention, the students´ learning experiences were gathered using an open-ended online questionnaire. The data was analyzed by the method of content analysis, firstly being classified into sub-themes and secondly combined further into top themes.

Expected Outcomes

The content analysis brought up categories referring to different aspects of TPACK. Students revealed simple technological knowledge, for example how to use Google Maps. They also indicated more specified knowledge that can be labeled pedagogical content knowledge, for example what contents does school geography cover, and how should it be taught? In addition, results highlighted technological content knowledge and technological pedagogical knowledge, for example how to select technologies that embody geography and how to use Google Maps in geography education? Preliminary results indicate that intervention supported the development of the students´ TPACK. The students themselves identified that the social interaction and the task script had an important role of supporting the learning processes. Descriptions of the students´ learning indicated that the use of Google maps was important for their learning. The Google maps simultaneously illustrated all the students´ perceptions and a shared view of the topic. In addition, it provided information about students’ individual reasoning. The shared map worked as a thinking tool in the students´ co-construction of knowledge and as a physical tool in their practical work. The use of the Google maps motivated students and helped them to understand the content of geography and a techno-pedagogical integration approach.

References

Engeström, Y. (2009). Toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualization. In K. Illeris (Eds.), Contemporary Theories of Learning. London: Routledge. Harris, J.B., & Hofer, M.J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in Action: A Descriptive study of secondary teachers´ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43 (3), 211–229. Harris, J. B., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers´ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41 (4), 393–416. Jang, S.-J. (2010). Integrating the interactive whiteboard and peer coaching to develop the TPACK of secondary science teachers. Computers & Education, 55 (4), 1744–1751. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32 (2), 131–152. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 60–70. Shuldman, M. (2004). Superintendent conceptions of institutional conditions that impact teacher technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36 (4), 319–343). Swan, K., & Hofer, M. (2011). In search of technological pedagogical content knowledge: Teachers´ initial foray into podcasting in economics. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44 (1), 75–98. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry. Toward a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the Mind. A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Author Information

Anu Hartikainen-Ahia (presenting / submitting)
The University of Eastern Filand
School of Applied Educational Science and Teacher Education
Joensuu
Teemu Valtonen (presenting)
University of Eastern Finland
Education
Joensuu
The University of Eastern Filand, Finland
The University of Eastern Filand, Finland

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.