Putting an end to “racism without races”? Renewed interculturality in teacher education in Finland
Author(s):
Fred Dervin (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

07 SES 10 B, Pupils’ Views on Diversity

Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-20
15:30-17:00
Room:
ESI 3 - Aula 5
Chair:
Hugh Busher

Contribution

Racism without races is a phrase which was proposed, amongst others, by French thinker Etienne Balibar (1991) to talk about new forms of racism, distinct from models which relied on biological difference. He argues that e.g. the concept of culture can be used, misused and abused to talk about the ‘Other’ and establish multidimensional hierarchies between the minority and the majority, the self and the other. It can in fact serve “as a euphemism for ethnicity and race both by majority groups in multiethnic societies as well as some minority groups” (Piller, 2011: 25). This has been noted e.g. in researchers’ discourses but also in educational contexts (Holliday, 2011).

In the use the concept, one can also identify the bias of excessive differentialism: people from different “cultures” are often presented as being distinctive, rarely alike. Finally, there is a strong belief in the “absurd idea” that people adhere fully to their ‘cultural’ world without questioning it (Bensa, 2010: 36-37). In societies where “seeing culture everywhere” (Breidenbach & Nyíri, 2009) is so engrained, can educators go beyond this phenomenon in their practice?

This is the challenge that the idea of “renewed interculturality” (or “interculturality without culture”, Dervin, 2011) is attempting to confront. It proposes to educators to review the sort of questions they ask themselves in front of their students. As such instead of asking what is student X’s culture? or How can I learn to work with culture A? the following questions, derived from a sociocontructivist and critical approach to education for diversities, could be asked: How do students negotiate and ‘do’ identity in relation to the ‘intercultural’? What cultural/identity markers do they use to define themselves, communicate, argue, convince and even manipulate (Abdallah-Pretceille, 2003)? Who is allowed to define “their” and “our” culture?  For the anthropologist Alban Bensa (2010: 21) it corresponds to examining the “political” in intercultural education rather than the structural.

 

Method

This paper is an attempt to observe the application of this renewed approach to intercultural education in the context of teacher education in Finnish Higher Education. A course on critical intercultural education (entitled “multicultural education”) was proposed to a group of 25 subject teacher trainees during which this “method” was developed. At the end of the course a 3-hour session gathered the students for focus groups. Having watched a documentary on a multicultural class in Israel (World Class Kids, Netta Leovy, 2010), the students had to discuss the expression, construction and negotiation of the intercultural in this context. The transcriptions of the focus groups are analyzed by means of linguistic discourse analysis.

Expected Outcomes

The paper shows the influence of the course on “renewed interculturality” on how the teacher trainees discussed issues of power, prejudice, inclusion/exclusion and justice in relation to the work of a class teacher.

References

Abdallah-Pretceille, M. (2003). Former et éduquer en contexte hétérogène. Pour un humanisme du divers. Paris: Economica. Balibar, E. (1991). “Is there a neo-racism?”. In Balibar, E. & Wallerstein, I. (eds.). Race, Nation, Class. London: Verso. Bensa, A. (2010). Après Levi-Strauss. Paris: Textuel. Breidenbach, J. & P. Nyíri (2009). Seeing culture everywhere. Washington: University of Washington Press. Dervin, F. (2011). Impostures interculturelles. Paris: L’Harmattan. Holliday, A. (2010). Intercultural Communication and Ideology. London: Sage. Piller, I. (2011). Intercultural Communication. A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.

Author Information

Fred Dervin (presenting / submitting)
University of Helsinki
Teacher Education
University of Helsinki

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.