Session Information
16 SES 06 B, ICT Supporting Meta-cognitive Skills and Search Skills
Parallel Paper Session
Contribution
Previous research has frequently highlighted that an inquiry-based approach and field work are important and essential elements of teaching and learning about ecology (e.g. Ramadoss & Poyya Moli, 2011; Ergazaki & Zogza, 2008). According to Bell, Urhahne, Schanze and Pletzer (2010), field work of investigation in inquiry process consists of empirical actions to collect information or data e.g. making experiments, measurements, and organizing the data. In the analysis and interpretation phase, the data should be used for making arguments for or against the hypothesis. Bell et al. (2010) show that there is a great variety of effective computerized inquiry environments that can support students’ inquiry learning by using a variety of scaffolding methods (Fishmanet al., 2003).
This study introduces a way to support students’ collaborative inquiry process with social software in the context of biology field course. The study is part of a larger project for developing pedagogically sound ways to use ICT as part of higher education. The topic is current in Finland and internationally because teachers need skills to take advantage of different ICTs, to be able to provide their students with skills needed in knowledge society, i.e. 21st century skills (Binkley et al. 2010). This study introduces a way to use social software for supporting inquiry-based approach to learning and provides insight into students’ experiences of the method used based on data from questionnaires and recorded sessions where students evaluate the whole course in small groups.
Social software provides several tools for different purposes. A common feature for all these software is the emphasis for users’, i.e. students’, active role as producers of materials and participators in interactive activities (Alexander, 2006). The tools allow students to gather and produce materials which will be used as a source for further inquiry and learning. These materials can be in different formats: text, pictures, video etc. Social software also provides tools for editing, analyzing and publishing materials. These practices can be done collaboratively as the produced contents can be shared, commented on and edited in shared environments. Social software also allows annotating of materials with tags in order to administering and analyzing them.
Our expectation is that by providing students with learning environments equipped with appropriate social software we can support students’ collaborative inquiry process described by Bell et al. (2010). During the course students were instructed to make research concerning forest ecology. For this purpose we built a learning environment allowing the use of blogs, tags, spreadsheets and tools for following purposes:
1. Building picture blogs as shared databases of flora in the investigated ecotypes
2. Classifying the pictures/plants using central biological concepts by tagging
3. Building a shared representation of the diversity of flora using online spreadsheets
4. Analysing the above data and building research reports as web pages
Research questions were:
How did students experience the use of social software tools for collaborative inquiry?
How did the use of online tools and scaffolds support disciplinary ways of working and reporting in inquiry?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0 A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 33–44. Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M. & Rumble, M. (2010). Defining 21st century skills. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills project draft White Papers. Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Ergazaki, M. & Zogza, V. (2008). Exploring lake ecology in a computer-supported learning environment. Journal of Biological Education, 42(2), 30-34. Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643-658. Ramadoss, A. & Poyya Moli, C. (2011). Biodiversity conservation through environmental education for sustainable development –a case study from Puducherry, India. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 1(2), 97-111.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.