Student Teachers And Placement Experiences: Reflection, Competence And Worth In An Uncertain Environment
Author(s):
David Miller (presenting / submitting) Mary Knight (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 02 B, Parallel Paper Session

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-18
15:15-16:45
Room:
ESI 1 - Aula 35
Chair:
Donald Gray

Contribution

Recent curricular change in Scotland (Scottish Government, 2008) has been accompanied by a critical review of teacher education (see Donaldson, 2011). Many changes to the way we prepare teachers are proposed in that report, but notable by its absence is any reference to a developmental perspective on how students grow in pedagogical terms. At the University of Dundee, a series of projects is looking at the student experience of undergraduate teacher education. Data have already been collected in relation to students’ engagement with learning processes on campus (Knight & Shimi, in preparation). The work reported here looks at issues related to professional learning on placement and how this impacts upon students’ self-perceptions at different stages of their development. Although situated in the Scottish context, the issues of professional learning on school placements will be of interest to teacher educators in other European systems also.

 

The research literature on how student teachers develop during the course of their training is not extensive. It has often focused on the role of the placement teachers or mentors in the development of professional competence (see, for example, Edwards & Protheroe, 2003; Zeichner, 2002) or the nature of knowledge for teaching (e.g. Colucci-Gray & Fraser, 2008).  In the literature which looks more closely at the perceptions of student teachers themselves, studies have highlighted the extra pressures that students feel when out on placement (Macintyre & Tuson,1995; Miller & Fraser, 1998, 2000). However, with few exceptions  (e.g. Calderhead, 1991; Maynard & Furlong, 1993) there seems little on how students’ beliefs are actually influenced from a developmental perspective.

 

Some insights can be gained from writing which looks at the nature of professional knowledge more widely and such work has alerted us to qualitative differences in the ways that novices at different stages of professional development interpret experiences (Dreyfus, 2001; Berliner, 1988). These different perceptions also include the extent to which individuals focus on themselves and/or on the nature of the task facing them (Fuller & Bown, 1975) A further perspective on differences in student thinking and reflection can be conceptualised in terms of McIntyre’s levels of reflection in teacher education (see McIntyre 1993).

 

Our work in this area is an attempt to bring together several of these perspectives to better understand the process of student teacher development. The focus of this presentation will be data collected from undergraduate students which point to qualitative differences in how they interpret experiences in primary classrooms. Issues emerging include the nature of (mainly technical) reflection at different stages of the teacher education programme and the interpretive repertoires which appear to be in evidence. Quantitative data relating to perceptions of self-competence and self-worth are correlated with data from a content analysis of student narratives to further investigate relationships. Taken together these analyses provide insights into the relationship between individual self-perceptions and development in students’ understanding of the complexities of classroom teaching. They provide useful information for teacher educators planning for student progression over the course of a four-year primary teaching degree.

Method

The choice of methodology reflects the main concern of this phase of the project: the need to capture information about the way affective and conceptual issues interact in the student teacher experience, and they way these are mirrored in the reflective writing of students at different stages of their development. Additionally, changes in self-competence and self-worth are measured using Rosenberg’s SES (Rosenberg, 1985) and subsequently analysed on the basis of a two-dimensional model of self-esteem (Tafarodi & Swann, 2001). Analysis of students’ pedagogical thinking involves two phases: content analysis of reflective writing tasks, followed by exploration of interpretive repertoires. Themes are extracted from these analyses which point to the ways in which students’ judgements of competence and feelings of worth are closely tied up with the ways in which they ‘see’ the nature of classroom interactions.

Expected Outcomes

The main benefit from this work will be information which helps teacher educators to structure a more developmentally-focused ITE programme. It is an axiom of classroom teaching that teachers take account of children’s perceptions and provide learning experiences which are developmentally appropriate. The extent to which a similar developmental perspective is adopted on student teacher learning is not at all clear, but the current work being undertaken has the potential to feed into such an approach. Although set in a Scottish context, there may be implications for teacher educators in other European systems faced with similar concerns about the professional preparation of teachers More specifically the expected outcomes include: • Further information about the lived reality of training to become a primary school teacher, with a particular focus on placement experiences. • Insights into the relationship between the affective and the cognitive, and between the conceptual and practical pressures of placement experiences • Information about how students reflect on their experiences at different stages of their professional development • An evaluation of the extent to which competence and worth relate to the nature of experiences on placement • Pointers as to how teacher educators can ensure developmentally-appropriate teacher education programmes.

References

Calderhead, J. & Robson. M. (1991) Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7 (1), 1-8. Colucci-Gray, L. and Fraser, C. (2008) “Contested Aspects of Becoming a Teacher: teacher learning and the role of subject knowledge” European Educational Research Journal, 7 (4) 475-485 Donaldson, G. (2011) Teaching Scotland’s Future, Report of review of teacher education in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government. Dreyfus, H. (2001) On the Internet. London: Routledge. Edwards, A. & Protheroe, L. (2003) Learning to see in Classrooms: What are student teachers learning about teaching and learning while learning to teach in schools? British Educational Research Journal, 29 (2), 227-242. Fuller, F.F & Bown, O.H. (1975) ‘Becoming a teacher’. In K.J. Rehange, (Ed) Teacher Education. Chicago: University of Chicago. Knight, M. & Shimi, J. (in preparation) Evaluating Students’ Perceptions of Collaboration in Initial Teacher Education. University of Dundee. Macintyre, C. and Tuson, J. (1995), ‘Stress in school experience’, Education in the North, 3, 71-73. McIntyre, D. (1993) Theory theorising and reflection in teacher education. In J. Calderhead & P Gates, (Eds.) Conceptualizing reflection in teacher development. London: Falmer Maynard, T. & Furlong, J. (1993) ‘Learning to teach and models of mentoring’. In D. McIntyre, H. Hagger & M. Wilkin (Eds) Mentoring: Perspectives on school-based teacher education. London: Kogan Page. Miller, D.J. & Fraser, E. (1998) A dangerous age? Age-related differences in students’ attitudes towards their teacher training course. Scottish Educational Review, 30 (1), 41-51. Miller, D.J. & Fraser, E. (2000). Stress associated with being a student teacher Scottish Educational Review. 32 (2), 142-154. Scottish Government (2008) Curriculum for Excellence. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Tafarodi, R.W. & Milne, A.B. (2002) Decomposing Global Self-Esteem. Journal of Personality, 70 (4), 443-483. Zeichner, K. (2002) Beyond Traditional Structures of Student Teaching. Teacher Education Quarterly, Spring, 59-64

Author Information

David Miller (presenting / submitting)
University of Dundee
Dundee
Mary Knight (presenting)
University of Dundee
Education
Dundee

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.