Creating an Early Learning Network to improve school teachers’ initial training
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 10 D, Parallel Paper Session

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-20
15:30-17:00
Room:
FCEE - Aula 4.3
Chair:
Marit Ulvik

Contribution

The teachers’ initial training has a fundamental role in the shaping of new beliefs, the transformation of implicit ideas and the acquisition of professional skills of future teachers with the goal of enabling them for effectively intervening in practical scenarios.

The professors’ practical reasoning constitutes the basis of their activities and decision-making in the classroom (Carter & Doyle, 1995 and 1996). From that reality springs the need for developing quality educational experiences from the very beginning of their initial training. We need to encourage university students not only to know, by basically reading the educational innovations, but also to commit emotionally to them, that is, that they experiment with them.

            We believe that the creation of a network in which the persons involved in the teachers’ initial training and the practicing teachers, considered as valuable professional references, interact with one another, is one way to bring closer and integrate theory and practice (Dirckinck-Holmfeld, Jones & Lindström, 2009 and Koper, 2009).

            The collaboration theme of the early learning network is the Project Work method, to be a topic of interest shared by the participating teachers, the university staff and the student teachers. The Project Work methodology relates to the constructivist theory (Coll et al., 1999) and comprehensive approach to school knowledge (Torres, 1996 and Zabala, 1993), the latter understood as a process in which the relations between distinct areas of knowledge are based on the needs that arise when solving problems in understanding and investigating reality. In early childhood education it is important to eliminate the fragmentation of the curriculum in different areas and address the educational experience from an integrated perspective (Aindrés, Lorenzo & Marrero, 1996 and Mollá & Torres, 2003).

 

Participants and research questions

 This innovation experience, developed during the academic year 2010-2011 as part of the degree of Early Childhood Education at the University of Cordoba (Spain), comprises two early childhood education advisors (in charge of the permanent education of the university staff), twenty-eight school teachers, five university professors, seventy teacher students, and seven hundred twenty children aged between three and six years. The questions that have guided our research regarding the innovation experience are:

-          Is it possible to set up a learning network that includes professors and student teachers from both the initial teacher training program and the permanent education program?

-          Does the collaboration with practicing school teachers improve the teacher students’ capacity to apply Project Work methods in the classroom?

-          What are the strengths and weaknesses that we can identify in this innovative experience?

Method

This research is framed within the setting of an interpretative approach to educational research, bearing in mind its transformative and critical dimension (Pozuelos and Traver, 2004). It is a study situated in an action-research focus (Latorre, 2004), in which we use the Project Work method as a reflective element for our professional development. The research tools we employ are the students’ diaries as well as that of the Education professor responsible for developing the innovation. For the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the experiment, we use the Focus Group in which the groups involved in the Early Learning Network participate; that is, kindergarten teachers, advisers at this stage, students and faculty. The technique used for the analysis of textual data has been the analysis of discourse (Schifnbfrin, Tannen & Hamilton (Eds.), 2001) conducted on a small scale.

Expected Outcomes

The students and faculty, as well as the teachers and advisers have all expressed their feeling as being part of an Early Learning Network. They declared that their conception of the Project Work has been slightly modified with input from the student teachers. For its part, the faculty has indicated that their understanding of the project method, especially in relation to the teaching sequence and the design of learning environments, has undergone a significant change with the input and practical proposals they have shared with teachers at this stage. University students point out that working 'on an equal footing' with the teachers at this stage and having the opportunity to 'learn from them' has helped them feel and act as 'true professionals'. They also claim that their professional skills to apply the method of Work Projects in infant classrooms have improved significantly. They focus the main benefits on the following: (1) Learning to hear the children’s proposals; (2) Understanding the learning potential of children at this age; and (3) Perceiving the complexity involved in addressing the diversity of an infant classroom. Finally, the difficulties of this experience have been identified with the limited time available.

References

AINDRÉS, M., LORENZO, J. Y MARRERO, J. (1996). Las posibilidades en las Aulas Taller. Método de Proyectos. Programa Aula taller.Proyectos de trabajo, transversales. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 243, 78-83. CARTER, K. & DOYLE, W. (1996). Personal narrative and life history in learning to teach. En J. Sikula T. J. Buttery y E. Guyton (dir), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York: MacMillan, 120-142. COLL, C., MARTÍN, E., MAURI, T., MIRAS, M., ONRUBIA, J., SOLÉ, I. y ZABALA, A. (1999). El constructivismo en el aula. Barcelona: Graó. CONTRERAS, J. (2010). Ser y saber en la formación didáctica del profesorado: una visión personal. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 68 (24.2), 61-68. DIRCKINCK-HOLMFELD, L., JONES, C., and LINDSTRÖM, B. (2009) Analysing Networked Learning Practices in Higher Education and Continuing Professional Development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, BV. KOPER, R. (Ed.)(2009), Learning Network Services for Professional Development. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. LATORRE, A. (2004, 4ª ed.). La investigación-acción Conocer y cambiar la práctica educativa. Barcelona: Graó. MOLLÁ, J.A. y TORRES, M. (2003). ¿Qué queremos aprender? Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 321, 20-23. POZUELOS, F. y TRAVÉ, G. (2004). Aprender investigando, investigar para aprender: el punto de vista de los futuros docentes. Investigación en la Escuela, 54, 5-25. TORRES, J. (1996). Sin muros en las aulas: el currículum integrado. Kikirikí, Cooperación Educativa, 39, 39-45. ZABALA, A. (1993). Los ámbitos de intervención en la Educación Infantil y el enfoque globalizador. Aula de Innovación, 11, 15-18.

Author Information

University of Córdoba
Córdoba
Rosario Mérida (presenting)
University of Córdoba
Córdoba
Miruna Mandru (presenting)
University of Córdoba, Spain
UNIVERSIDAD DE CÓRDOBA
EDUCACIÓN
Córdoba

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.