Session Information
03 SES 06 B, Citizenship Education in the School Curriculum
Parallel Paper Session
Contribution
The ways we have looked at democracy and citizenship has changed significantly in the past century. Differences, also connected to distinct transition processes, have an effect on how democracy and citizenship are perceived today and on the quality of democracy in different countries. The process of democratic transition in Europe were varied; while some countries have stable democracies since the WWII (e.g., Germany and Italy), in others democratic regimes only appeared after the fall of authoritarian regimes in the mid-seventies (e.g., Portugal and Spain) or in the nineties, after the fall of the Berlin Wall (e.g., Czech Republic, Slovenia).
Since the signs of authoritarianism in a country's political culture are long lasting and taking into consideration that “the agenda of how ‘to deal with the past’ has become increasingly associated with the quality of contemporary democracies” (Pinto, 2010, p. 339) there are indications that the knowledge about the political past is still scarce, particularly in younger generations. Spain and Portugal are specific examples of this framework (Hedke et al., 2008; Menezes et al., 2005). The survival of both authoritarian regimes until the mid-seventies also depended on the pragmatism that characterized their relationship with other European states and the United States, leading to an increasingly less blatant proclamation of the fascist discourse that was obvious until the early forties (Loff, 2008). Consequently, it is relevant to consider whether this shadow of the authoritarian past still accounts for the way we think of ourselves as citizens in a democracy.
This paper considers the specific case of Portugal and Spain, departing from their evident similarities, to understand to what extent schools are nowadays committed to fostering a democratic culture that integrates a critical historical consciousness of the totalitarian past, by critically looking at the connections between the teaching of national history and the organization of citizenship education, in both countries.
It makes particular sense to question how images of these pasts are depicted in the curricula, textbooks and teacher training, as well as to reflect if the past is overly discussed or concealed, criticized or whitewashed. In this sense, the analysis of history textbooks can indicate how a society actively and intentionally constructs its citizens and their memory given that textbooks can promote “a particularly intense kind of memory-making” (Brito, 2010, p. 360) that implies “on-going ‘cognitive battles’ over memory (...) [between] competing ‘truths’” across time: “one political or generational cohort may opt for amnesia; another may decide it is time to pursue justice” (p. 365).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Araújo, H. (2008). Teachers’ perspectives in Portugal and recent institutional contributions on citizenship education. Journal of Social Science Education, 6, (2), pp 73-83; Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101; Brito, A. Barahona de (2010). Transitional justice and memory: Exploring perspectives. South European Society and Politics, 15, 3, 359-376; Habermas, J. (1995). Citizenship and National Identity: Some reflections on the Future of Europe. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing citizenship (pp. 255-82). New York: State University of New York Press; Heater, D. (2005). What is citizenship? Cambridge. Polity Press; Hedtke, R. Zimenkova, T., Hippe, T. (2008). A Trinity of Transformation, Europeanisation and Democratisation? Current Research on Citizenship Education in Europe. Journal of Social Science Education, Vol. 8, Number 2, pp. 5:20; Jover, G., Naval, C. (2007). Transformed Institutions – Transformed Citizenship Education? Remarks on the Current Situation in Spain, in Europe. Journal of Social Science Education, Vol. 8, Number 2, pp. 29-39; Loff, M. (2008). “O Nosso Século é Fascista!”. O Mundo visto por Salazar e Franco (1936-1945). Porto. Campo das Letras; Menezes, I. (2003). Civic Education in Portugal: curricular evolution in basic education. Online Journal of Social Science Education, Number 2, pp. 1-13; Menezes, I., Afonso, R., Gião, J., Amaro, G. (2005). Conhecimentos, concepções e práticas de cidadania dos jovens portugueses: Um estudo internacional. Lisboa: Direcção-Geral de Inovação e Desenvolvimento Curricular; Pinto, A. Costa (2010). The Authoritarian Past and South European Democracies: an Introduction. South European Society and Politics, 15, 3, 339-35; Soysal, Y. & Strang, D. (1989). Construction of the First Mass Education Systems in Nineteenth-century Europe. Sociology of Education, 62, 3, 277-288;
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.