Session Information
10 SES 04 C, Parallel Paper Session
Parallel Paper Session
Contribution
Research question:
How can reflection and discourse competence be developed by teacher students during their teacher education studies?
Objectives
Currently a method that is experimentally applied in the field of teacher education at the University of Innsbruck is being designed as a module for teacher education to stimulate students’ reflective competence.
By using the method of the pedagogical reflective interview, information on educational processes of reflection can be gathered. With these data reflection processes of teacher students reflecting on pedagogical crisis situations can be explored and an overview of the basic principles of reflection processes in teacher education can be given. The aim is to develop a new module for teacher education in order to continue the professionalization of the teacher education studies. A new model of teacher professionalism favors skills such as teachers as reflective practitioners (Donald Schön 1991, Alex Moore 2007)
Theoretical framework
Recently there is an initiative aiming at taking up and broadening the issue of teachers’ professionalization. The Austrian ministry of education has set up a team of experts of the field of education working together in the project DEPIC (Developing of Professionalization in an International Context). So far, the group has devised the basics from which to develop professionalization and eventually put this notion into practice. The immediate concern of EPIK is “developing professionalization of (future) Austrian teachers in an international setting” (Schratz/Schrittesser et al., 2007). These domains of teacher professionalism are: reflection and discourse, awareness of professionalism, personal mastery, collegiality and ability to differentiate.
Reflection and discourse ability is therefore one of the core competences of the teaching profession. The reflection of one's own educational action serves to develop a professional teaching self. This refers to a professional teaching self with the important ability to reflect continuously at the moment of educational action and in retrospect.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Alheit, P (1993): Transitorische Bildungsprozesse: Das „biographische Paradigma“ in der Weiterbildung. In: Mader, Wilhelm (Hg.): Weiterbildung und Gesellschaft. Grundlagen wissenschaftlicher und beruflicher Praxis in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bremen: Universitätsbuchhandlung Bremen, 343-417 Christof, Eveline (2009): Bildungsprozessen auf der Spur. Das pädagogisch reflexive Interview. Wien: Löcker Moon, Jennifer A. (2004): A Handbook of Reflective and Experiental Learning – Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge Falmer Moore, Alex (2007): Beyond Reflection: Contingency, Idiosyncrasy and Reflexivity in Initial Teacher Education. In: Hammersley, Martyn (Ed.): Educational Research and Evidence-based Practice. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage Publications, 121-138 Schön, Donald (1991): The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. Schratz, Michael/ Schrittesser, Ilse/ Forthuber, Peter/ Pahr, Gerhard/ Paseka, Angelika/ Seel, Andrea (2005): Domänen von Lehrer/innen/professionalität. Entwicklung von Professionalität im internationalen Kontext (EPIK). In: journal für lehrerinnen- und lehrerbildung, Heft 1/2007, Innsbruck, Wien, Bozen: Studienverlag, p. 70-80.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.