Teachers’ and Students’ Decisions to Use Externally Developed Innovations
Author(s):
Michael Stralla (presenting / submitting) Petra Herzmann (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

03 SES 08 B, Supportive Educative Materials

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-20
09:00-10:30
Room:
FFL - Aula 4 B
Chair:
Majella V Dempsey

Contribution

Currently within the German school system a number of different reforms are simultaneously being undertaken. The main triggers for the continuing pressure to modernise and transform the German school system were the sobering results of German pupils in international assessment tests. As a result, the educational policy makers and administrations in Germany are supporting the reform of the education system through a stronger financial commitment to intervention studies and model projects.

 An essential aim is to generate scientifically based knowledge and to disseminate it into practical settings. Evidence-based change of educational practice emphasizes that only those innovations which have proven effects on pupils should be disseminated, especially with respect to their performance development (Slavin, 2002). In this context a mostly new field of research has established in Germany, focusing on factors that influence the successful transfer of externally developed innovations in educational systems (see Nickolaus & Gräsel, 2006). 

 From a sociological systems theory perspective it is assumed, that externally stimulated transfers into complex social systems are viewed as difficult, due to the internal “forces of inertia” of organisations and their members. For this reason, initiatives to change educational practice should pay greater attention to three main factors: (subjective) characteristics of innovations, organisational and structural properties of the recipients' surroundings (school) and recipients’ attributes (schoolteachers) (Gräsel et al, 2006; Jäger, 2004; see also Hall & Hord, 2006; Berg, Sleegers, Geijsel & Vandenberghe, 2000). 

 Although teachers’ decisions to use the innovations in their classrooms are the current focus of interest, there is little empirical based knowledge about their underlying conditions. The same applies to the students’ decisions to use the innovations. They are regarded as addressees of the educational innovation. Evaluation studies assessing school interventions typically include their achievements as the main indicator of effectiveness. Surprisingly, the students’ specific views on school development are not taken into consideration.

 From this perspective, we examine teachers´ and students’ decisions to use educational innovations in the context of enhancing learning strategy skills during lessons. The aim of the project 'Enhancing Teachers’ Competences in Analysing and Fostering Students’ Learning Strategy Skills' is to qualify teachers in how to diagnose the use of learning strategies in their 5th grade secondary school students and to foster them through specific training. From each of the 40 participating schools in three regions of Germany between 6 and 10 teachers are part of the project. The training includes components to increase cognitive, metacognitive and motivational strategies (e.g. strategies of text comprehension, strategies for evaluating one’s own learning process and individual setting of academic goals).

 

In the context of the outlined learning strategy training we aspire to answer the following research questions: 

- Which specific decision making criteria to use the externally developed innovation “fostering learning strategy skills of 5th grade students” can be reconstruct?

- Which decision making criteria are identified by the interviewees as being particularly significant when making their decisions to use the externally developed innovation?

Method

To evaluate the strategy training, the increase of students’ competences is measured by using quantitative measures concerning outputs of learning (school grades, self-developed tests). In addition, qualitative measures are used in the context of the presented substudy to reconstruct teachers´ and students’ decisions to use educational innovations. To answer the research questions we’ll conduct in-depth interviews with teachers and group discussions with selected students from three participating schools. Both in-depth interviews and group discussions were semi-structured by the use of key questions. The written transcripts of in-depth interviews and classroom discussions were analysed by using coding procedures of Grounded Theory Methodology (open, axial/theoretical and selective coding) (see Corbin & Strauss, 2008). The transfer approach serves as heuristic framework of concepts to guide the empirical investigations. During the analyses further theoretical approaches may be used to support the coding process/process of theory generation. For pragmatic reasons successive sampling (theoretical sampling) is omitted. An empirically grounded construction of types is aimed at through the use of the constant comparative method.

Expected Outcomes

A preliminary study including group discussions with students has produced initial findings. The re-sults indicate that students’ decisions to use the implemented strategy training are primarily deter-mined by the relative benefit from usage for learning success. The students especially underlined the perceived relevance of strategy training for successful class tests and examinations. In addition to performance-linked conditions, the participation in configuration of strategy training is positively associated with their decision to use. However, the interviewed students feel no necessity to use (new) learning strategies, if teachers’ explanations are detailed, clear and involve extensive demonstrations (associated with a lower-learner-activating lesson types). Moreover, previous experience implementing the project has indicated that teachers’ perceived benefit of altered lessons for learning success of their students in comparison to their regular les-sons, influences a successful implementation. Furthermore, modifications of strategy training by the teachers are positively associated with their decision to use externally developed innovations. Finally, teachers’ motivation to implement the strategy training is related to their perceived available time, which, as a consequence of the simultaneously implemented reforms, is regarded as limited. More detailed analyses should prove if additional resources are associated with positive decisions to use externally developed innovations.

References

Berg, R. v., Sleegers, P., Geijsel, F., & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Implementation of an innovation: Meeting the concerns of teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 331–350. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3. ed.). Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage Publ. Gräsel, C., Jäger, M., & Wilke, H. (2006). Konzeption einer übergreifenden Transferforschung und Einbeziehung des internationalen Forschungsstandes. In R. Nickolaus; C. Gräsel, & M. Abel (Eds.), Innovation und Transfer: Expertisen zur Transferforschung (pp. 445–566). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider-Verl. Hohengehren. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. Jäger, M. (2004). Transfer in Schulentwicklungsprojekten (1. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwiss. Nickolaus, R., Gräsel, C., & Abel, M. (Eds.) (2006). Innovation und Transfer: Expertisen zur Transferforschung. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider-Verl. Hohengehren. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Re-search. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.

Author Information

Michael Stralla (presenting / submitting)
University of Cologne
Faculty of Human Sciences
Cologne
Petra Herzmann (presenting)
University of Cologne, Germany

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.