The purpose of this paper is first, to explore the role of situated judgment in emergent and recurrent situations in the classroom for teacher professionalism, and second, to contribute to the discussion of the applicability of management theories on education. Teachers’ professional judgments in the classroom are made in the face of imperfect, complex if not contradictory, but above all, continuously emergent situations, circumstances that make profound difference for the kinds of judgments that are, and can be, made. How can we further understand and discuss these as part of teacher professionalism, and how can we understand teachers’ possibilities for making professional judgments in relation the consequences of prevailing trends on policy levels in Europe today?

Research on professions commonly use criteria for professions such as that they provide an important public service, involve a theoretically as well as practically grounded expertise and have a distinct ethical dimension which calls for expression in a code of practice (see e.g. Carr, 2000). However, some attempts to be viewed as a profession actually decrease the possibilities for acting professionally. For example, the attempt to standardize and raise status of practice in education through developing competency standards (building on the notion that complex judgments are possible to standardize), has been criticized by Carr and Skinner (2009) as a key problem that erodes or discourages more integrated perspectives on educational practice (see also Ball, 2009). Moreover, the increased relational complexity brought about by the intensification of teachers’ work may decrease the space possible for professional judgment, in several ways. This development is a reality in many Western countries of today, where the educational sector is reformed in order to mirror the private sector, as a consequence of the influence of actors such as the OECD and the World Bank (Ball, 2003). In combination with shrinking public finances this leads to an intensification of teachers’ work (e.g. Apple, 2007; Goodson & Norrie, 2005; Hargreaves, 2000). A market logic and a ‘language of learning’ (see Biesta, 2006) treats as insignificant certain complexities of teachers’ work. The ‘blame and shame’ tactics and high stakes testing produces risk management strategies where teachers may even ask for rules in order to avoid blame (Lindqvist & Nordänger, 2006). All these developments contribute to reducing the space for professional judgment. Ball (2009) even deems professionalism as an ethical-cultural practice as having no future or place in the present regime of performativity and managerialism.

In this context, in order to contribute to the discussion on teachers’ professional judgment, I draw here on theories of complexity (Osberg & Biesta, 2010) and practical knowledge (Beckett, 1996; Beckett & Hager, 2002) in an analysis of examples of teachers’ judgments. More specifically, through a combination of theoretical elements from complexity, and the notion of hot action; action that is performed without time for reflection, I illuminate and draw attention to the significance of the present in teachers’ professional judgment. 

Apple, M. W. (2007). Ideological success, educational failure?: On the politics of No Child Left Behind. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(2), 108-116. Ball, S. J. (2009). Educational Reform, Teacher Professionalism and the End of Authenticity. In M. Simons, M. Olssen & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Re-Reading Education Policies. A Handbook Studying the Policy Agenda of the 21st Century. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Beckett, D. (1996). Critical judgment and professional practice. Educational Theory, 46(2), 135-149. Beckett, D., & Hager, P. J. (2002). Life, work, and learning: Practice and postmodernity. London: Routledge. Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers. Carr, D. (2000). Professionalism and ethics in teaching. London: Routledge. Carr, D., & Skinner, D. (2009). The cultural roots of professional wisdom: Towards a broader view of teacher expertise. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 41(2), 141-154. Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (1993). The elicitation and reconstruction of practical arguments in teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(2), 101-114. Frelin, A. (2010). Teachers' relational practices and professionality. Uppsala: Institutionen för didaktik, Uppsala universitet. Goodson, I., & Norrie, C. (Eds.). (2005). Work Package 1. A Literature Review of Welfare State Restructuring in Education and Health Care in European Contexts: Implications for the Teaching and Nursing Professions and their Professional Knowledge: EU Sixth Framework Programme Priority [Citizens] Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 6(2), 151-182. Lindqvist, P., & Nordänger, U. K. (2006). Who dares to disconnect in the age of uncertainty? Teachers' recesses and 'off-the-clock' work. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(6), 623. Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (Eds.). (2010). Complexity Theory and the Politics of Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience : human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.