Long-Term Effects of Grades on Later Achievement in Compulsory and Upper Secondary School
Author(s):
Alli Klapp (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

09 SES 09 C, Determinants of Student Achievement and Educational Segregation

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-20
11:00-12:30
Room:
FCT - Seminario 2
Chair:
Jana Strakova

Contribution

The effect of summative assessments, such as grades, on student motivation for learning and achievement, has been investigated by numerous researchers. To a large extent the results are disparate and have led to different conclusions (Cameron et al., 2005; Harlen & Deakin, 2002; Ryan & Deci, 2000). The Differentiation Effect Theory suggests that the effect of grades and tests varies due to students´ level of ability, age, gender and socio-economic status (SES) while the Competitive Preference Theory suggests that more or less all students benefit from grades and tests irrespective of their characteristics and background (Cameron et al., 2005; Deci & Ryan, 2000). However, the majority of the results show that there are differential effects of being graded on later achievement and that the effects are different for different subgroups of students. Butler (1988) compared student´s motivation for learning after receiving different types of feed-back on several tasks. The students were given grades, comments or both. The conclusion was that comments had the largest positive effect on student motivation for learning while grades had a negative effect. According to the Conservation of Resources Stress Theory (COR) (Hobfoll, 1989, 2001), students strive to gain, rebuild and protect their resources (self-esteem) in order to reach success in school and to minimize stress. When experiencing failure in school, their self-esteem is threatened which may lead to a decrease of learning and development of negative attitudes towards school.

                      In a recently conducted quasi-experimental study (Klapp, Cliffordson & Gustafsson, 2011) based on a 10 percent national representative sample, half of which received grades and half of which did not receive grades in the 6th Grade of compulsory school. The whole sample received grades in the 7th Grade. The result showed that students who received grades in the 6th Grade achieved slightly lower grade point average (GPA) one year later in comparison to students who did not receive grades in the 6th Grade, after controlling for selection effects by the use of cognitive tests. The result also showed interaction effects. Students with low cognitive ability, and high socioeconomic status who were graded, received lower GPA in the 7th Grade (effect sizes ranged from .20 to .49), whereas students with high ability and low socioeconomic status benefited from being graded. Thus, according to these results, to be graded seems to widen the gap even more between different subgroups of students due to their level of ability, gender and SES (Klapp, Cliffordson & Gustafsson, 2011).

                       In the current study, the main purpose is to investigate the long-term effects of being graded or not for later achievement by analysing data for subsequent Grades (7th, 8th, 9th Grades, completion of upper secondary school, and exam from university) for different subgroups of students.

Method

Data comes from the Gothenburg Educational Longitudinal Database (GOLD) containing, besides GPA from 7th, 8th and 9th Grade, information about completion of upper secondary school, university exam, gender, SES and result from cognitive tests from the 6th Grade. The participants are 7 343 students born in 1967 who left compulsory school in 1983. During 12 years, 1969-1981, the Swedish educational system let municipalities decide whether or not to grade their students in the 6th Grade, while grades in the 7th, 8th and 9th Grades still was compulsory. This circumstance makes it possible to conduct a quasi-experimental design. In order to investigate the change over time, growth modeling is conducted (Gustafsson, 2004). The models from the previous study (Klapp, Cliffordson & Gustafsson, 2011) are the starting-point for the current study. Structural Equation Modeling is used, and possible clustering effects are investigated by applying the “complex” option in the Mplus program version 5.2 (Muthén & Muthén, 2009).

Expected Outcomes

The result from the previous study (Klapp, Cliffordson & Gustafsson, 2011) showed that early grades affected students negatively when graded one year later, low-ability boys with a high socio-economic status were most affected negatively by being graded, while high-ability girls with low socio-economic status were positively affected by being graded . The initial results from the current study show similar pattern as for the previous study, but also that the differential effects of being graded grow stronger over grades 7 to 9. However, further analyses will be conducted.

References

Cameron, J. W., Pierce, D., Banko, K. M., & Gear, A. (2005). Achievement-based Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation: A Test of Cognitive Mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 641-655. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ”What” and ”Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and Self-determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. Gustafsson, J.-E. (2004). Modelling individual differences in change through latent variable growth and mixture growth modelling: basic principles and empirical examples. In A. Demetriou, & A. Raftopoulos (Eds.). Cognitive Developmental Change. Theories, Models and Measurement, (pp. 379-401). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Harlen, W., & Deakin, C. R. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students´ motivation for learning (EPPI-Centre Review, version 1.1). In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. Klapp, A., Cliffordson, C., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2011). The effect of being graded on later achievement – evidence from 13-year-olds in Swedish compulsory school. Submitted for possible publication. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2008). Mplus user´s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

Author Information

Alli Klapp (presenting / submitting)
University of Gothenburg
Department of Education
Blentarp

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.