Session Information
07 SES 08 B, Schools for Democracy and Social Justice
Parallel Paper Session
Contribution
Education plays a key role in fighting against social exclusion and works towards social justice understood as three dimensions: redistribution, recognition and participation. Schools, as fundamental educational element, are basic elements in a fairer society through their work in and for Social Justice (Murillo and Hernández-Castilla, 2011). In that context are school leaders who are, finally, the capability to prevent or promote inclusion actions, integration and social cohesion (Murillo, Krichesky, Castro and Hernández-Castilla, 2010).
In this paper we present the research funded R & D + i (EDU2010-18 224) results which try to find what are characteristics and behaviours that have become more successful schools that work towards a fairer society.
Research agrees there is no special practices that characterize these leaders, or a particular type of leadership is the key for inclusion and social justice but on the contrary, we must be willing to change a leadership style and grabbing strategies that work best for each challenge (Harris and Chapman, 2002; Kugelmass, 2003; Muijs et al., 2007). Without necessarily contradicting the previous idea, various empirical studies have made some interesting contributions that help to give guidance about models and leadership practices that appear to be on the basis of social justice leadership conception. In this context it is interesting to distinguish two aspects of leadership; the processes and the content, so is the style and leadership practices.
Empirical studies that have attempted to determine the model or style of leadership for social justice do not always agree. Indeed, while Hopkins (2001) remarks that it is educational and transformational leadership, others indicate that these leaders are characterized by an autocratic style in schools with special process or with serious trouble, but it is also found that these principals are not satisfactory (Chapman, 2005; Muijs et al., 2007). It also stressed the distributed leadership significance as the best way to begin, but above all, sustaining change in heterogeneous schools (eg Harris and Chapman, 2002). However, there is a leadership characteristic exercised in schools that achieve inclusion, and it lies in the emphasis that the focus is made on democratic and participative leadership.
It is likely that what defines the inclusive leadership style are not the practices that are promoted, linked to a series of values and principles related to social justice. Some of them, according to research, are (Blackmore, 2002; Bogotch, 2002; Riester, Pursch, & Skrla, 2002, Brown, 2004, Marshall & Olivia, 2006; Ryan, 2006; Frattura & Capper, 2007): Identifying and articulating the vision of the school, developing people, strengthening inclusive school culture, focus on improving the teaching and learning, promote the creation of professional learning communities, and promote collaboration between school and family, promoting the development of educational cultures in families.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Blackmore, J. (2002). Leadership for Socially Just Schooling: More Substance and less style in high risk, low trust times? Journal of School Leadership, 12 (2), 198 –222. Bogotch, I. (2002). Educational leadership and social justice: Practice into theory. Journal of School Leadership, 12(2), 138 – 156. Brown, K.M. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Leadership Quarterly, 40 (1), pp. 77-108. Chapman, C. (2005). Leadership in Schools facing Challenging Circumstances. London Review of Education, 2(2), 95-108. Frattura, E. y Capper, C.A. (2007). Leading for social justice: Transforming schools for all learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Goldfarb, K. P.y Grinberg, J. (2002). Leadership for social justice: Authentic participation in the case of a community center in Caracas, Venezuela. Journal of School Leadership, 12 (2), pp. 157–173. Harris, A. y Chapman, C. (2002). Democratic Leadership for School Improvement in Challenging Contexts. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning (IEJLL), 6(9). Kugelmass, J.W. (2003). Inclusive Leadership; Leadership for Inclusion. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership (NCSL). Marshall, C. y Olivia, M. (Eds.) (2006). Leaders for Social Justice: Making Revolutions in Education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Murillo, F.J. y Hernández Castilla, R. (2011). Hacia un concepto de Justicia Social. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 9 (4), pp. 7-23. Murillo, F.J., Krichesky, G., Castro, A y Hernández Castilla, R. (2010). Liderazgo para la Inclusión y la Justicia Social. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva, 5(1). Murillo, Krichesky, Castro y Hernández Castilla, 2010). Riester, A., Pursch, V. y Skrla, L. (2002). Principals for social justice: Leaders of school success for children from low-income homes. Journal of School Leadership,12(3), pp. 281-304. Ryan, J. (2006). Inclusive Leadership and Social Justice for Schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5, pp. 3–17.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.