What is Distinctive about Lesson Study as a Vehicle for Collaborative Teacher Development? Secondary School Case Studies
Author(s):
Wasyl Cajkler (presenting / submitting) David Pedder (presenting) Julie Norton Phil Wood
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

01 SES 10 B, Focussing on the Lesson and Collaboration

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-20
15:30-17:00
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.7
Chair:
Harry Kullmann

Contribution

Lesson study (LS) is a collaborative research-oriented learning activity originating from Japan that has been the subject of studies not only in Japan but also in China, the USA and UK (Fernandez et al. 2003; Park, 2008; Dudley, 2008). To summarise, teachers work together in lesson study groups to identify a challenge that their students have with an aspect of learning. They then jointly plan a lesson, teach and evaluate it. Such lessons, subjected to systematic analysis by participating teachers, are called research or study lessons.  A growing body of evidence suggests that LS is a powerful dynamic approach to teacher education and professional learning (Fernandez, 2002; Lewis & Tsuchida, 1997; Puchner & Taylor, 2006). Therefore, we have undertaken small-scale qualitative research, combining informant style interviewing (Powney & Watts, 1987) and discourse analysis, to understand more about the collective learning processes at play in lesson study contexts. To explore what is distinctive about lesson study, we formulated the following research questions:

1. Through what processes do teachers learn in LS groups?

2. How do teachers work collaboratively in LS groups?

3. How do teachers plan, talk about, and learn from changes in classroom practice in LS lessons?

4. What kinds of talk and language use mediate professional learning, knowledge creation and transformation in LS groups?

5. What criteria do teachers apply to evaluating the quality of LS lessons?

Underlying these questions is a framework for thinking about teachers’ learning that draws on social constructivism with its emphasis on how learning is influenced by social interaction with others and by active processes of constructing understandings, making sense of new experiences and building on one another’s knowledge and expertise.  A particular interest pursued through the research relates to the kinds of talk and interaction between teachers in lesson study groups that mediate teachers’ learning collectively and individually.

The setting for the project is an East Midlands urban secondary school in England, from January to June 2012. Four Mathematics and two Modern Languages teachers have volunteered to work with us to understand more about how collaboration in LS contributes to their learning, both individually and collectively. 

The project will investigate this by analysing the discursive processes that teachers engage in while participating in LS groups, how they work collaboratively in the groups and how they plan, talk about and learn from research lessons. As a result, the research team is recording the kinds of talk and language used to mediate professional learning, knowledge creation and transformation in LS groups.

The teachers bring an active agenda of reflection and enquiry centred on optimising three related learning outcomes through participation in LS processes:

a)      enhanced quality of  professional learning and pedagogic content knowledge;

b)     improvements in the quality of pupils’ classroom learning opportunities in lessons developed collectively;

c)     evaluation of the quality of  their participation in LS groups, as a possible vehicle for future professional development. 

Method

Teachers have been inducted into the project drawing on Dudley’s (2008) lesson study framework and the project will run for two cycles. Researchers will not be present at the planning/evaluation meetings nor the study lesson, but will gather data (recordings of preparation and post-lesson evaluation meetings) and conduct pre and post lesson study interviews. Recordings of meetings will be transcribed and analysed for evidence of teacher development in the collaborative framework of lesson study. Individual interviews with participants will seek to elicit contextualised and detailed accounts of learning experiences from meetings and observations or teaching of research lessons. Analyses will be made of the recordings of preparation/evaluation events and of the subsequent interviews that occur before the teaching of the lesson and again after its evaluation. Thematic analysis of planning and evaluation meetings forms an important part of the data analysis strategy and is central to identifying the nature of teachers’ talk that mediates their learning and knowledge creation, when jointly planning and evaluating lessons. Transcript data will be entered into NVivo for thematic analysis and reliability testing. Discourse analysis is also important for identifying critical learning points in the process.

Expected Outcomes

The project will capture evidence of teacher learning through lesson study: how they work together to address issues of common concern, to understand student learning and adjust teaching in the light of such understanding. Discourse analysis of transcriptions of teacher interactions in LS preparation and evaluation meetings will reveal the kinds of talk that mediate teacher learning in a collaborative context. The informant–style interviews conducted by researchers will offer contextualised accounts from teachers of their perspectives about the usefulness of particular stages of lesson study with regard to their professional knowledge and practice. The presentation will end with discussion of an alternative reflective model of teacher education, for wider use as schools and university partnerships develop in future years.

References

Dudley, P. (2008) Lesson Study development in England from school networks to national policy: the development of Lesson Study in England and its growing use as a professional learning process for the development and transfer of pedagogic practice. World Association of Lesson Studies Annual Conference, Hong Kong, December 2008. Fernandez, C. (2002) Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393–405. Fernandez, C. Cannon, J. & Choksi, S. (2003) A US-Japan lesson study collaboration reveal critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 171–185. Lewis, C. & Tsuchida, I. (1997) Planned educational change in Japan: The case of elementary science instruction. Journal of Educational Policy, 12(5), 313–331. Parks, A.N. (2008) Messy learning: Preservice teachers’ lesson-study conversations about mathematics and students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1200–1216. Powney, J. & Watts, M. (1987) Interviewing in Educational Research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Puchner, A. & Taylor, A.R. (2006) Lesson study, collaboration and teacher efficacy: Stories from two school-based math lesson study groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 922–934.

Author Information

Wasyl Cajkler (presenting / submitting)
University of Leicester
Education
Leicester
David Pedder (presenting)
University of Leicester
School of Education
Leicester
University of Leicester, United Kingdom
University of Leicester, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.