Identification and Support for Students with Special Educational Needs in Post-Secondary Educational Institutions in Singapore
Author(s):
Iris Yu (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 07 B, Students’ Experiences in Education

Parallel Paper Session
Chair: Gunilla Lundström

Time:
2012-09-19
17:15-18:45
Room:
FFL - Aula 17
Chair:

Contribution

In the past decade, there has been research conducted in developed countries, e.g. US, Europe and Australia which have reviewed the support which is available for students with special educational needs (SEN) in post-secondary education settings. The literature reflects how such education settings have developed different ways of supporting students with SEN, and the barriers to providing support. (see References)

 

The purpose for conducting this piece of research is to conduct a needs analysis on the students with SEN studying in post-secondary educational institutions, specifically in Singapore, and the current support available for them. This is important as support for students with SEN in primary and secondary schools are increasingly more available, and hence more of them will begin to articulate to post-secondary institutions. There is a need for greater awareness of the difficulties faced by the students, and the aim of the research is to enable the institutions to develop better approaches and strategies to develop their capacity to support students with SEN.

 

The research questions are :

  1. What are the Special Educational Needs (SEN) of students in the different post-secondary institutions (PSEIs) in Singapore?
  2. What are the difficulties faced by students with SEN in PSEIs in Singapore?
  3. What are the current supports available for students with SEN in PSEIs in Singapore?

 

The focus of the research will be on junior colleges (JCs)  who prepare students from age 16-19, for university entry, and the Institute of Education (ITE) that conducts vocational training for students 16-19 as well as adult learners. The target group of students that will be reviewed will be those who have entered these institutions from secondary schools, after they have completed their GCE O and N Levels.

 

This will also provide an opportunity to compare what is reported in the literature in other countries, to what is currently happening in Singapore, and to apply the learning from other countries, so that we can continue to support our students with SEN beyond our national primary and secondary schools.

Method

The main methodology is to use semi-structured interviews with students and teachers to obtain their perspectives of the difficutlies faced by the students, and what support is available. The views of parents were also captured in a short parent survey. The interviews were then content analysed based on the Grounded Theory approach (Strauss and Corbin, 1990); and data which are of direct relevance to the research questions were theoretically analysed. Students were identified through the Ministry's database of students with SEN, and selected for in-depth profiling. Parental consent was obtained through the institutions.

Expected Outcomes

The findings highlighted several key issues in the support for SEN at post-secondary level, i.e. refusal of parents/students to disclose the disability condition; the lack of awareness of and support for special needs; and lack of advice for students to select courses that best fit their special needs and learning profile. The difficulties with full participation by those with obvious physical and sensory difficulties, the social challenges faced by the students and their need for more time to cope with the academic demands, due to cognitive processing difficulties, (e.g. working memory, processing speed) are the main barriers to the success of students with SEN in PSEIs. These findings shared with ITE has encouraged them to review their existing supports, and ensure that there are sufficient opportunities for socialization, as well as ways to improve the students’ cognitive and learning skills, enabling them to be independent learners. Efforts to increase awareness of teachers and lecturers, as well as to improve transition support processes is already starting to take place.

References

Fuller, M., Bradley, A. & Healey, M. (2004). Incorporating disabled students within an inclusive higher education environment. Disability & Society, 19, 455-468 Fuller, M., Healey, M., Bradley, A. & Hall, T. (2004). Barriers to learning: a systematic study of the experience of disabled students in one university. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 303-318. Getzel, E.E., McManus, S., & Briel, L.W. (2004). An effective model for college students with LD and ADHD. Improving Secondary Education and Transition Services through Research, 3, 1-3. Harris, R. & Robertson, J. (2001). Successful strategies for college-bound students with learning disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 45, 125-131 Kosine, N.R. (2007). Preparing students with learning disabilities for postsecondary education: what the literature research tells about transition planning. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 20), 93-104. Leysera, Y. & Greenbergerb, Y. (2008). College students with disabilities in teacher education: faculty attitudes and practices. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23,, 237–251. Madriaga, M. (2007). Enduring disablism: students with dyslexia and their pathways into UK higher education and beyond. Disability & Society 22, 399-412. Ryan, J. (2007). Learning Disabilities in Australian Universities: Hidden, Ignored, and Unwelcome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 436-442. Stampoltzis, A, & Polychronopoulou, S. (2009). Greek university students with dyslexia: an interview study. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24, 307-321. Tagayuna, A. Stodden, R.A., Chang, C., Zeleznik, M.E. & Whelley, T.A. (2005). A two-year comparison of support provision for persons with disabilities in postsecondary education. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 13-21. Tinklin, T. & Hall, J. (1999). Getting round obstacles: disabled students' experiences in higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher Education 24, 183-194. Tinklina, T., Riddella, S. & Wilson, A. (2004). Policy and provision for disabled students in higher education in Scotland and England: the current state of play. Studies in Higher Education 29, 637-657.

Author Information

Iris Yu (presenting / submitting)
Ministry of Education, Singapore
Psychological Services Branch
Singapore

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.