Session Information
08 SES 05 B, Perspectives on Health and Safety Education and Health Literacy
Parallel Paper Session
Contribution
Health literacy is a growing health promotion and health education topic for the 21st century. Health literacy has been described and acknowledged as a direct outcome of health education, and can be seen as a quantifiable measure of an individual’s health potential. Furthermore, the health literacy of an individual has been observed to impact upon the behaviour and health of that individual. The paper describes the theoretical background and developmental processes/methodology involved with the development and implementation of a comprehensive measurement of health literacy in an adolescent population of school children (15 years-old) in both Finland and England. The health domains of physical activity and nutrition are used as the subject matter.
In the quest to contribute towards the development of effectual school health education via a health literacy approach, a Delphi survey was conducted with a representative panel of experts in Finland. The survey aimed to discover the group (expert) opinion regarding the most important components of health education in the domains (topics) of physical activity and nutrition. A list of health education components was devised from available literature and composed in learning outcome, or competencies format using a health literacy framework (Knowledge, skills, abilities etc.). The Delphi survey consisted of two rounds with 28 panel members (93% and 86% response rate respectively). The first round presented 62 components to the panel who indicated the importance of each component on a four-point Likert scale (from very important to not important at all). The second round consisted of a list of 24 components which had been collectively (mean score ≥ 2) judged to be important from the first round. The panel members chose their 10 most important components from the list and ranked them from 1 to 10 (10 being the most important).
To compliment the findings of the Delphi survey, and contribute further to the creation of an accurate and comprehensive measurement tool, a systematic review of literature was conducted in order to discover the current research activity in the measurement of child/adolescent health literacy. 16 papers were selected for analysis from an initial screen of 4969 articles, and 4 key research questions were asked and answered.
The Delphi survey resulted in a ranked list of health education learning outcomes (competences) deemed to be the most important topics for teaching in school physical activity and nutrition health education. This list also provided confirmation that the teaching and assessment of a full spectrum of health literacy components/competencies is achievable within these topics. The results of the systematic review also presented which health topics had been investigated, as well as the measurement instruments used and developed, the components of health literacy identified as important by the authors, and the efficacy of the measurement methods to achieve the desired aims.
The findings of the Delphi survey and systematic review form the foundation of the design of the new, comprehensive measurement tool of child/adolescent health literacy.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Abel T. Measuring health literacy: moving towards a health-promotion perspective. International Journal of Public Health 2008; 53: 169-170. Baker DW. The meaning and measure of health literacy. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2006; 21: 878-883. Borzekowski DLG. Considering children and health literacy. Pediatrics 2009; 124: s282-s288. IOM (Institute of Medicine) Health Literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington. The National Academies Press, 2004. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Measures of health literacy. Workshop summary. Washington DC. The National Academies Press, 2009. Kickbusch I. Health literacy: skilling students for better health. Virtually Healthy 2006; 41: 2-3. Kickbusch I. Health literacy: addressing the health and education divide. Health Promotion International 2001; 16: 3, 289-297. Mancuso JM. Assessment and measurement of health literacy: an integrative review of the literature. Nursing and Health Sciences 2009; 11: 77-89. Manganello JA. Health literacy and adolescents: a framework and agenda for future research. Health Education Research 2008; 23: 5, 840-847. Nutbeam D. Defining and measuring health literacy: what can we learn from literacy studies? International Journal of Public Health 2009; 54: 303-305. Nutbeam D. Health outcomes and health promotion: defining success in health promotion. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 1996; 6: 58-60. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International 2000; 15: 259-267. Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Social Science and Medicine 2008; 67: 2072-2078. St Leger L. Schools, health literacy and public health: possibilities and challenges. Health Promotion International 2001; 16: 197-205. Wills J. Health literacy: new packaging for health education or radical movement? International Journal of Public Health 2009; 54: 3-4.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.