Session Information
27 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Exhibition
General Poster Session during Lunch
Contribution
Note taking is a pervasive strategy college students use to learn from lectures. Previous studies on lecture note taking engaged in sparse exploration of its correlates, except for learning performance. As we know, the use of learning strategy is fueled and supported by learning motivation. Previous studies have shown that the use of learning strategy is positively correlated with learning motivation. Also, some studies found that learning motivation could predict learning strategy. Therefore, as a learning strategy, lecture note taking is supposed to have a close relation with learning motivation. This study aimed to explore the relation of college students’ learning motivation to their lecture note taking. It was conducted in a college course. The researchers investigated students’ learning motivation variables in regard to the course and realized their relations to the quantity and quality of lecture notes in the course. Two questions were examined: (1) Did learning motivation variables correlate with the quantity and quality of lecture notes? (2) Could the regression model of learning motivation variables predict the quantity and quality of lecture notes?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bonner, J. M., & Holliday, W. G.. (2006). How college science students engage in note-taking strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), 786-818. Castello, M., & Monereo, C. (2005). Students’ note-taking as a knowledge-construction tool. Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5, 265-285. Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 242-262. Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of notetaking/- reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26(3). 459-477. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40. Peverly, S. T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski. J., Alidoost, M., & Garner, J. (2007). What predicts skill in lecture note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 167-180. Sankaran, S. R.& Bui, T. (2001). Impact of learning strategies and motivation on performance: A study in web-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(3), 191-198. Wang, Y., Peng, H., Huang, R., Hou, Y., & Wang, J.(2008). Characteristics of distance learners: research on relationships of learning motivation, learning strategy, self-efficacy, attribution and learning results. Open learning, 23(1), 17-28. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.