The Impact Of Primary School's Socio-economic Composition On Social Differences In Educational Choice At The Transition To Secondary School
Author(s):
Simon Boone (presenting / submitting) Mieke Van Houtte
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

14 SES 06 A, School-related Transitions Within a Life Course Perspective – Early Phases

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-19
15:30-17:00
Room:
ESI 2 - Aula 4
Chair:
Pedro Silva

Contribution

The persistence of inequalities in educational attainment despite massive educational expansion has been one of the major concerns in European education research during the past decades (e.g. Blossfeld and Shavit, 1993; Breen, 2009). Researchers generally agree that class differentials in educational attainment are due to differences in scholastic achievement, on the one hand and differences in educational choice, on the other hand. The latter have received wide attention among European education scholars as parents along with their children have to choose between mutually exclusive tracks at a fairly young age in most European education systems. Several studies have shown that working class parents do less often opt for the more demanding –academic- tracks in secondary education than service class parents, even if their children achieved equally well (e.g. Ditton and Krüsken, 2006, for Germany; Jaeger, 2009, for Denmark; Kloosterman, et al., 2009, for the Netherlands). Researchers have tended to explain these differentials by referring to differences in the amount of cultural, economic or social resources parents of pupils possess. In recent years rational action theory has become the predominant theoretical framework in research on socioeconomic differences in educational choice, witness the growing number of studies inspired by this theoretical perspective (Hatcher, 1998). Rational action theories explain inequalities in educational choice by referring to the different cost-benefit calculations parents with different socioeconomic status arrive at when faced with an educational decision (Goldthorpe, 1996; Breen and Goldthorpe, 1997). Whereas for a working class child it may suffice to enrol in some form of  technical or vocational education, for a child stemming from a service class family, on the contrary, only academic education is a viable option. However, very little, if any, research has been taking into account features of the primary school in explaining this social inequality in educational choice. Yet, educational decisions are not taken in a social vacuum, for pupils’ preferences are socially constructed through interaction with peers and other significant persons. We might hypothesize that the composition of pupils’ peer groups in primary school may impact on pupils’ choices.  In present study we aim to test empirically by means of multilevel analysis whether and how the association between socioeconomic background and educational choice at the transition from primary to secondary education in Flanders—the northern Dutch-speaking part of Belgium—is affected by the socioeconomic composition of the primary school.

Method

To answer these research questions, we use data gathered during the months of May and June 2008 from 1339 parents of pupils in their last year of primary education in a sample of 53 primary schools in Flanders. These data allow us to make use of multilevel analysis techniques, so that we can adequately control for individual pupils’ characteristics and test cross-level interactions. We assume that parents in Flanders make a series of binary choices when deciding between the educational alternatives available at the onset of secondary education. Consequently, we use stepwise logistic multilevel regression analyses.

Expected Outcomes

Results show that educational choices of average-SES pupils are not determined by the SES-composition of the primary school. For pupils with a higher than average SES the SES-composition exerts a positive influence, indicating that for pupils with a higher than average SES higher-SES pupils function as a normative reference group with respect to educational choice. For pupils with a lower than average SES, the effect of SES-composition is negligible, but negative. This points into the direction of relative deprivation, or an illustration of a frog-pond-effect regarding SES.

References

Blossfeld, H-P. & Shavit, Y. (1993), Persisting barriers: changes in educational opportunities in thirteen countries, in Shavit, Y. & Blossfeld, H-P. (Eds.), Persistent inequality; changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder: Westview Press. Breen, R. & Goldthorpe, J. (1997), Explaining educational differentials: towards a formal rational action theory, Rationality and Society, 9 (3), 275-305. Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W. & Pollak R. (2009), Nonpersistent inequality in educational attainment: evidence from eight European countries, American Journal of Sociology, 114 (5), pp. 1475-1521. Ditton, H. & Krüsken, J. (2010), Bildungslaufbahnen im differenzierten Schulsystem - Entwicklungsverläufe von Laufbahnempfehlungen und Bildungsaspirationen in der Grundschulzeit, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 12, 74-102. Goldthorpe, J. (1996), Class analysis and the reorientation of class theory: the case of persisting differentials in educational attainment, British Journal of Sociology, 47 (3), 481-505. Hatcher, R. (1998), Class differentiation in education: rational choices?, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19 (1), 5-24. Jaeger, M.M. (2009), Equal access but unequal outcomes: cultural capital and educational choices in a meritocratic society, Social Forces, 87 (4), 1943-1972. Kloosterman, R., Ruiter, S., de Graaf, P.M. & Kraaykamp, G. (2009), Parental education, children’s performance and the transition to higher secondary education: trends in primary and secondary effects over five Dutch school cohorts (1965-99), The British Journal of Sociology, 60 (2), 377-398.

Author Information

Simon Boone (presenting / submitting)
Ghent University
Department of Sociology
Gent
Ghent University, Belgium

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.